We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 27
Experimental research is an attempt by the
researcher to maintain control over all
factors that may affect the result of an experiment. In doing this, the researcher attempts to determine or predict what may occur. Experimental design is a blueprint of the procedure that enables the researcher to test his hypothesis by reaching valid conclusions about relationships between independent and dependent variables. Identify and define the problem. Formulate hypothesis and deduce its consequence. Construct an experimental that represents all the elements, conditions, and relations to the consequence. Conduct the experiment. Compile raw data and reduce to usable form. Apply an appropriate test of significance. Manipulation of an independent variable. All variables except the dependent variable are held constant (control). Manipulation of the dependent variable by the independent variable is observed (observation). Experimental control attempts to predict events that will occur in the experimental setting by neutralizing the effects of other factors. Physical control Selective control Statistical control Gives all subjects equal exposure to the independent variable. Controls non-experimental variables that
effect the dependent variable.
Indirectly manipulate by selecting in or out variables that cannot be controlled. Variables not conducive to physical or selective manipulation may be controlled by statistical techniques. Did the experimental treatment make the difference in this specific instance rather than extraneous variables? History Maturation Pre-testing Measuring instruments Statistical regression Differential selection Experimental mortality Interaction of factors The events occurring between the first and second measurements in addition to the experimental variable which might affect the measurement. The process of maturing which takes place in the individual during the duration of the experiment which is not a result of specific events but of simply growing older, growing tired or similar changes. The effect created on the second measurement by having a measurement before the experiment. Changes in instruments, calibration of instruments, observers or scorers may cause changes in the measurements. Where groups are chosen because of extreme scores of measurements, those scores tend to move toward the mean with repeated measurements even without an experimental variable. Different individuals or groups have different previous knowledge or ability which would affect the final measurement if not taken into account. The loss of subjects from comparison groups could greatly affect the comparisons because of unique characteristics of those subjects. Groups to be compared need to be the same as before the experiment. Combinations of many of these factors may interact especially in multiple group comparisons to produce erroneous measurements. To what populations, settings, treatment variables and measurement variables can this observed effect be generalized? Pre-testing Differential selection Experimental procedures Multiple treatment interference Individuals who were pre-tested might be less or more sensitive to the experimental variable or might have learned from the pre-test making them unrepresentative of the population who had not been pre- tested. The selection of the subjects determines how the findings may be generalized. Subjects selected from a small group or one with particular characteristics would limit generalizability. The experimental procedures and arrangements have a certain amount of effect on the subjects in the experimental settings. If the subjects are exposed to more than one treatment, then the findings could only be generalized to individuals exposed to the same treatments in the same order of presentation. Pre-test Control group Randomization Additional groups