Week 3 Concept of SHRM
Week 3 Concept of SHRM
Concept of SHRM
By:
Muhammad Ali
Malik
Subjects in Modules
Concept of HRM
Concept of Strategy
Concept of SHRM
HR Strategies (Nature,
Purpose, Development &
Implementation)
Strategic Role of HR
The impact of SHRM
SHRM in Action
HR Strategies
Construct
Today’s Lecture
Definitions
Concept of SHRM
o Communication
o Involvement
o Security of employment
• Strategic fit
• Strategic flexibility
Concepts of Strategic HRM
The Resource-Based View (RBV)
• To a large extent, the philosophy of strategic HRM is
based on the resource-based view
• The resource-based view as developed by Penrose
(1959) and expanded by Wernerfelt (1984) provides ‘a
durable basis for strategy’ (Grant, 1991) and ‘builds on
and provides a unifying framework for the field of
strategic human resource management’ (Kamoche,
1996)
Concepts of Strategic HRM
• This states that it is the range of resources in an
organization, including its human resources, that
produces its unique character and creates competitive
advantage (Hamel and Prahalad, 1989)
• Jay Barney (1991, 1995) states that competitive
advantage arises:
o first when firms within an industry are
heterogeneous with respect to the strategic
resources they control and,
o second, when these resources are not perfectly
mobile across firms and thus heterogeneity can be
long-lasting.
Concepts of Strategic HRM
• These resources include all the experience, knowledge,
judgment, risk-taking propensity and wisdom of
individuals associated with a firm
• For a firm resource to have the potential for creating
sustained competitive advantage it should have four
attributes:
[
Concepts of Strategic HRM
•Wright and McMahan (1992) also argue that
competitive advantage through people resources
arises because :
o There is heterogeneity in their availability in the
sense of the differences that exist between them
across firms in an industry
o They are immobile in the sense that competing
firms may be unable to recruit them
[
Concepts of Strategic HRM
• Boxall and Purcell (2003) refer RBV as human resource
advantage. The aim is to develop strategic capability.
• This means strategic fit between resources and
opportunities, obtaining added value from:
o the effective deployment of resources
o developing people who can think and plan
strategically in the sense that they understand the key
strategic issues and
o ensure that what they do supports the achievement of
the business’s strategic goals.
Concepts of Strategic HRM
Strategic fit
• As explained by Wright and McMahan (1992)
strategic fit refers to the two dimensions that distinguish
strategic HRM:
o ‘First, vertically, it entails the linking of HRM
practices with the strategic management processes of
the organization.
o Second, horizontally, it emphasizes the coordination
or congruence among the various HRM practices.’
CONCEPTS OF STRATEGIC HRM
Strategic flexibility
• Strategic flexibility is defined as the ability of the firm to
respond and adapt to changes in its competitive
environment
• Environmental differences will affect a flexibility
strategy.
• As indicated by Wright and Snell (1998), in a stable,
predictable environment the strategy could be to
develop people with a narrow range of skills (or not to
develop multiskilled people) and to elicit a narrow range
of behaviour (eg tight job descriptions
Perspectives on Strategic HRM
According to Delery and Doty (1996), there are three
HRM perspectives:
• The universalistic perspective – some HR practices are
better than others and all organizations should adopt these
best practices. There is a universal relationship between
individual ‘best’ practices and firm performance.
• The contingency perspective – in order to be effective,
an organization’s HR policies must be consistent with
other aspects of the organization. The primary
contingency factor is the organization’s strategy. This can
be described as ‘vertical fit’
*Contingency. A future event or circumstance, which is possible but cannot be predicted with certainty
Perspectives on Strategic HRM
• The configurational perspective (bundling) – this is a
holistic approach that reflect an understanding that
organizations are a cluster of interconnected structures,
linked processes, and mutually dependent practices that are
best viewed in a systemic or holistic manner
• As Richardson and Thompson (1999) comment, ‘A
strategy’s success turns on combining “vertical” or
external fit and “horizontal” or internal fit.’ They
conclude that a firm with bundles of HR practices should
have a higher level of performance, provided it also
achieves high levels of fit with its competitive strategy
[
Richardson & Thompson Approach
Richardson and Thompson (1999) proposed adopting the
commonly used terms of best-practice and best-fit
approaches for the universalistic and contingency
perspectives and ‘bundling’ as the third approach
The Best Practice Approach
o This approach is based on the assumption that there is
a set of best HRM practices and that adopting them
will inevitably lead to superior organizational
performance. They are universal in the sense that they
are best in any situation.
[
The Best-Practice Approach
Lists of best practices
A number of lists of ‘best practices’ have been produced,
the best known of which was produced by Pfeffer (1994),
namely:
• Employment security
• Selective hiring
• Self-managed teams
• High compensation contingent on performance
• Training to provide a skilled and motivated workforce
• Reduction of status differentials
• Sharing information
The Best-Practice Approach
The following list was drawn up by Guest (1999):
• Selection and the careful use of selection tests
• Training, and in particular a recognition that training is
an ongoing activity;
• Job design to ensure flexibility, commitment and
motivation
• Communication to ensure that a two-way process keeps
everyone fully informed;
• Employee share ownership programs to increase
employees’ awareness
The Best-Practice Approach
Delery and Doty (1996) identified seven strategic HR
practices, i.e; related to overall organizational
performance:
o Use of internal career ladders
o Formal training systems
o Results-orientated appraisal
o Performance based compensation
o Employment security
o Employee voice
o Broadly defined jobs
The Best-Fit Approach
There is a choice of models, namely life cycle model,
competitive strategy, and strategic configuration
• The life cycle model
The life cycle model is based on the theory that the
development of a firm takes place in four stages: start-up,
growth, maturity and decline. This is in line with product
life cycle theory
The basic premise of this model was expressed by Baird
and Meshoulam (1988) as follows:
o ‘HRM’s effectiveness depends on its fit with the
organization’s stage of development
The Best-Fit Approach
o As the organization grows and develops, HRM
programs, practices and procedures must change to
meet its needs
o Consistent with growth and development models it can
be suggested that HRM develops through a series of
stages as the organization becomes more complex.’
The Best-Fit Approach
•Competitive Strategy
customers
oCost leadership – the planned result of policies aimed at
• Strategic configuration
o Organizations will be more effective if they adopt a
policy of strategic configuration (Delery and Doty,
1996) by matching their strategy to one of the ideal
types defined by theories such as those produced by
Mintzberg (1979) and Miles and Snow (1978)
o This increased effectiveness is attributed to the
internal consistency or fit between the patterns of
relevant contextual, structural and strategic factors
The Best-Fit Approach
• Strategic configuration
o The typology of organizations produced by
Mintzberg (1979) classified them into five ideal
types: simple structure, machine bureaucracy,
professional bureaucracy, divisionalized form and
adhocracy.
Bundling
As Richardson and Thompson (1999) comment, ‘A
strategy’s success turns on combining “vertical” or
external fit and “horizontal” or internal fit
They conclude that a firm with bundles of associated HR
practices should have a higher level of performance,
providing it also achieves high levels of fit with its
competitive strategy
Bundling’ is the development and implementation of
several HR practices together so that they are interrelated
and therefore complement and reinforce each other
Bundling