Nutritional Assesment: Group 3 Fefrina Helda Rany Ika Fardila Ridho Mahendra Zahara Muthia Rusdy
Nutritional Assesment: Group 3 Fefrina Helda Rany Ika Fardila Ridho Mahendra Zahara Muthia Rusdy
Assesment
Group 3
1. Fefrina Helda
2. Rany Ika Fardila
3. Ridho Mahendra
4. Zahara Muthia Rusdy
Defining Nutritional Status
Optimal
Nutritional status nutritional Undernutrition Overnutrition
status
1. Identify individuals who are malnourished or are at risk for developing malnutrition.
2. Provide data for designing a nutrition plan of care that will prevent or minimize the development of malnutrition, and
Food allergies or intolerances Any problematic foods? Type of reaction? How long?
Three derived weight measures are used to depict changes in body weight. Body weight as a percentage of ideal body weight is
calculated using the following formula:
Abnormal Findings: A current weight of 80% to 90% of Ideal weight suggests mild mainutrition; 70% to 80 %, moderate mainutrition, and < 70%, severe malnutrition
Ideal weight is based on the Metropolitan Life Insurance Tables, 1983. these
tables remain the recommended standard. The percet usual body weight is
calculated as follows
Abnormal findings:
• A current weight of 85% to 95% of usual
body weight indicates mild malnutrition;
75% to 84% moderate malnutrition; and
<75% severe malnutrition
Recent weight change is calculated using the following formula: • An unintentional loss of >5% of body
weight over 1 month, >7,5% of body
weight over 3 months, or >10% of body
wight over 6 months is clinically
significant
Body Mass Index
Abnormal Findings:
The waist to hip ratio assesses body fat distribution as an indicator of health risk. Obese persons with
a greater proportion of fat in the upper body, especially in the abdomen, have android obesity, obese
persons with most of their fat in the hips and thighs have gynoid obesity. The equation is;
Abnormal findings: A waist-to-hip ratio of 1.0 or greater in men or 0.8 or greater in women indicative of android (upper
body) obesity and increasing risk for obesity-related diseases and early mortality
Skinfold Thickness
Skinfold thickness measurements estimate the body fat stores or the extent of obesity or undernutrition. Although other
sites can be used (biceps, subcapsular. or suprailiac skinfolds), the triceps skinfold (TSF) is most easily accessible. and
standards and techniques are most developed for this site. To measure TSF thickness:
1) Have the ambulatory person stand with arms hanging
freely at the sides and back to the examiner. (Non-
ambulatory persons should lie on one side. The
uppermost arm should be fully extended, with the palm
of the hand resting on the thigh.)
For example, a normal MAC for a 20-year-old female ranges from 23 to 34.5 cm; for a 20-
year-old male, the normal range is 27/2 to 37.2 cm. Remember that accurate MAC and TSF
measurements are difficult to obtain and interpret in older adults because of sagging skin, ages
in fat distribution, and declining muscle mass
Abnormal findings: Measurements below the 10 th percentile or above the 95 th percentile warrant further medical and
nutritional evaluation, very high or very low readings may be due to examiner error
Documentation and Critical Thinking
Sample Charting
Subjective
No history of diseases or surgery that would alter intake/ requirements; no recent weight changes; no
appetite changes. Socioeconomic history is noncontributory Does not smoke, drink alcohol, or use illegal,
prescription, or over-the-counter drugs. No food allergies. Sedentary lifestyle; plays golf once per week.
Objective
Dietary intake is adequate to meet protein and energy needs. No clinical signs of nutrient deficiencies.
Height, weight, and screening laboratory tests within normal ranges.
Documentation and Critical Thinking
Pellagra
Kwashiorkor
Follicular Hyperkeratosis
Scorbutic Gums
Rickets
Bitot’s spots
Magenta tongue