Chapter Five: Identification of Purposes, Layout, Styling, Evaluation and Standards in Abstracting
Chapter Five: Identification of Purposes, Layout, Styling, Evaluation and Standards in Abstracting
Identification of purposes,
Layout,
Styling,
Evaluation and
Standards in abstracting.
Introduction
The term abstract signifies a brief, objective representation
of the contents of a primary document or an oral presentation.
The term abstract should not be confused with the related but
distinct terms:
annotation is a brief explanation of a document or its contents,
usually added as a note to clarify a title.
Summary is a brief statement of the main point of something.
Synopsis is a brief summary of something.
Cont..
entirety.
Cont..
The abstract may facilitate a closer reading of the primary document
by providing an introductory overview of its topic or argument, or,
for readers to whom the document is of marginal interest,
The abstract may provide enough information to make a reading of
the full document unnecessary.
Abstracts also may render the primary content of a document in
another language accessible in the language of the abstract.
An abstract also facilitates free-text searching in an electronic
environment and supports the application of controlled indexing
vocabularies in access services.
Since abstracts originally intended to accompany a primary
publication may also be used by access services, these objectives
should be considered from the outset.
2. Location
In a journal an abstract should be placed on the first page of each
abstracted item between the title and the beginning of the text.
In a separately published document an abstract should be placed
between the title page and the text
In access publications and databases, or whenever an abstract is
reproduced separately from the document to which it refers, it should
be accompanied by a full bibliographic reference for the original
document.
3. Authorship
manuscript.
2. Assume a knowledgeable reader
In all writing there is always the question of the knowledge
3. Results
Describe results as concisely and informatively as possible.
They may be experimental or theoretical results obtained, data collected,
relationships and correlations noted, effects observed, etc.
When results are too numerous for all of them to be included, those pertaining to
new and verified events or that contradict previous theories should receive priority.
Cont..
4. Conclusions
Describe the implications of the results, especially how they
relate to the purpose of the investigation or the reason for
preparing the document.
Conclusions can be associated with recommendations,
evaluations, applications, suggestions, new relationships, and
hypotheses accepted or rejected.
Cont.…
5. Collateral and Other Information
Findings or information incidental to the main purpose of the document
but of value outside its major subject area may be included.
Report these clearly but in such a way that they do not 'distract from the
main theme.
Do not exaggerate in the abstract their relative importance in the source
document.
Cite background information from the document sparingly if at all.
Do not include information or claims not contained in the document
itself.
Access services may choose to include further details about the
document, such as the presence of extensive tables, illustrations,
indexes, and the number of bibliographic references.
Layout
Abstracts are generally described as either informative or indicative,
reflecting the mode or perspective in which they are written.
In the informative mode, the original document is condensed,
reflecting its tone and content.
In the indicative mode describes rather than paraphrases the original
document and its contents.
The mode employed in a particular situation depends on the purpose
of the abstract.
Both types of abstracts should present as much as possible of the
essential information contained in the text.
Abstracting Guidelines
The basic principle to keep in mind while writing an abstract, is
that the abstract may be the only text that users search and
consult, if they choose not to retrieve the original data or
information.
It help the abstractor focus on the key elements and select
terminology to be included.
Steps for Writing Effective Abstracts
Where an abstractor is given a work to abstract must observe the
following steps:
The abstractor must read or listen to the entire paper/manuscript long
enough for it to percolate and brew up a clear vision of what the paper
is all about.
He must also re-read the article, paper, or report with the goal of
abstracting in mind.
After he has finished re-reading the article, paper or report, he should
write a rough draft without looking back at what you are abstracting.
You should just summarize the information in a new way.
Cont..
The abstractor should revise the rough draft to:
Correct weaknesses in organization;
Drop unnecessary information;
Add important information you left out;
Fix errors in grammar, spelling and punctuation;
Flavour with style (avoid verbosity, use of active voice than
passive voice, condense parts if possible);
Print the final copy and read it again to catch any glitches that
you find.
Cont..
Tell what it means (discussions and conclusions)
Be informative but brief
Be extract, concise and unambiguous
Use short, complete sentences
Avoid unnecessary words
Describe conclusions in the present tense
Use abbreviation sparingly
Cite bibliographic date completely.
Cont..
Abstract entry consists of the following:
Name of author(s)
Address of author
Title of the document (including sub-titles if any)
Indication of the language of the document
Bibliographical specification of the document (This is what is called
imprints in librarianship).
Abstract proper
Information about the bibliography included in the original document.
Cont..
There are two primary types of abstracts and selection of the
appropriate type is dependent upon the nature of the material
being described, and the intended use of the abstract.
The indicative abstract contains generalized statements to
convey (indicate) to the user what the described item is about.
It is very brief, and does not contain specific findings.
Its purpose are:
to acquaint (inform) users with the subject content of the
resource and
to help them decide whether or not to consult the original
Cont..
The informative abstract is generally longer and contains
more complete and precise information about the resource,
such as scope, objectives, and purpose of the work,
methodologies used, key quantitative data, and any
conclusions and recommendations.
Its purpose is to serve as a true substitute for or surrogate of
the resource.
Cont..
Regardless of the type, an abstract should be:
able to serve as a stand-alone description which provides a
complete picture of the resource at the selected level of specificity;
comprehensive in its representation of the key concepts or
significant content that are present in the resource;
concise, precise, and accurate in its use of terminology;
written in a clear, terse, non-critical style; and
logically structured in its presentation of the selected data and
information.
Cont..
Examples of abstracts
Informative Abstracts
McCluskey, James J.; Parish, Thomas S. A comparative study of
cognitive skills in learning hyper card by right-brain dominant, left-
brain dominant, and mixed-brain dominant students. Education. 113(4):
553-555; 1994.
In the present study 24 undergraduate students were found to be
the writer focus to tell the readers about a specific subject or topic
and at the end the author leaves out his own opinion about that
topic.
2. Descriptive style
In descriptive writing style, the author focuses on describing an
coherent.
First Sentences
In the first sentence of an abstract, avoid naming the type of