Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 22
FINANCIAL INTEGRATION
Largely adopted from Aziakpono,
2007 Financial Integration: Definition • International finance and economic literature does not offer a unique definition of financial integration. • Financial openness, external financial liberalization, financial globalization and capital account liberalization have been used in connection to financial integration. Edison et al. (2002) “the degree to which an economy does not restrict cross-border financial transactions” Schmukler & Zoido-Lobaton (2001) “the integration of a country’s local financial system with international financial markets and institutions” • This integration typically requires liberalization of the domestic financial sector as well as the capital account. Financial integration thus: • Is when liberalized economies experience an increase in cross-country capital movement, • Including active participation by local borrowers and lenders in international markets and • A widespread use of international financial intermediaries. Prasad et al. (2003:4) financial globalization and financial integration are different concepts. • Financial globalization is an aggregate term that refers to global linkages through cross- border financial flows • Financial integration refers to an individual country’s linkages to international financial markets • Increasing financial globalization is associated with rising financial integration on average de jure and de facto financial integration • de jure financial integration represents policies associated with capital account liberalization. • de facto financial integration represents actual capital flows (Prasad et al. 2003:7). • de facto financial integration is not a variable that a country’s government can easily regulate. – the degree of de facto financial integration might still be high, if controls can be easily evaded. – Countries with few restrictions have not experienced significant capital flows = low de facto fin integration Pre-requisites for Financial Integration • Removal of any administrative and • Market-based restrictions on capital movement across borders and • The removal of regulatory, legal and tax discrimination between foreign and domestic suppliers of financial services (VonFurstenberg, 1998 and Brahmbhatt, 1998) • Some restrictions are subtle eg ‘behind the border’ which limit foreign suppliers on Gvt procurement eg, all suppliers must have bank accounts with domestic banks. Financial Integration Outcomes Allows: • Residents to move their funds and • To hold financial assets abroad; • Private firms to borrow freely in foreign financial markets; • Residents to make financial transactions in foreign currencies; • As well as non-residents to invest freely in domestic markets (Esen, 2000:5). • Thus capital account liberalisation or financial openness leads to international capital mobility (see Edison et al. 2002:2-3) Checks & Balances Movement of Capital might not mean Financial Integration (Prasad et al. 2004:9) • de jure integration-restriction on capital flows • de facto integration-realized capital flows Based on these classifications, 4 outcomes are possible: 1. Removal of restrictions on capital flows could lead to a high level of actual capital flows (devpd states) 2. Capital account restriction may be ineffective in controlling actual capital flows (L. America 70s & 80s) eg K flights in de jure closed to k flows. …continuation 3. ‘liberalization without integration’ – few K restrictions, but low K flows (most African states). 4. Closed capital accounts are also effectively closed in terms of capital flows. • Removal of legal restrictions on cross-border capital flows is insufficient to achieve financial integration. • Financial integration also requires freedom to trade in financial services through both cross-border provisions and foreign establishments (von Furstenberg 1998:55). Better Version • Financial integration thus entails more than just the freedom of individuals or firms (both domestic and foreign) to move their funds across-borders and to make transactions in foreign currencies; it also involves the cross border penetrations of financial institutions themselves. • Such foreign involvement in a country’s intermediation and financial system can help to bring a country’s financial development up to international standards and help mobilize domestic savings. • This, as noted by von Furstenberg (1998:55), can contribute to international financial integration without appreciable net international flows of capital being associated with a particular activity or their sum total. • Thus, while restrictions to cross-border capital movements could prevent financial integration, elimination of such restrictions is not sufficient to achieve it. Institutional Prerequisites • Introduction of standardized, internationally tradable financial products and • Of quotations and trading systems to the development of international conventions, as well as • The adoption of mutually recognized regulatory, supervisory, large-value transfer and final-settlement practices. – Some of these systems and standards can result from private laws and industry protocols, while – Others call for the direct involvement of governments and their international agents (see von Furstenberg, 1998:57 ). …continuation • Prasad et al. (2003:10) also recognize good macroeconomic policies and good domestic governance (which includes transparency of government operations and a low level of corruption) as important factors in investment flows from international mutual funds. • the existence of mutual confidence and the ability to form reputation capital and charter value to provide a firm basis for trust in the suppliers of financial services and in the appropriateness of their incentives are essential. • existence of a transparent and efficient legal system and quality law enforcement as well as respect for property rights and good accounting standards. Measurement of Financial Integration
• Make own Notes (Rule Based Measures, IMF –
restriction measure, Quinn’s measure, Outcome based measures, Quantity based measures etc Importance of Fin Integration • There is a growing interest in regional and global financial integration of which developing African countries are not left out. • Economic theory suggests that financial integration promotes economic growth and enhances welfare This is achieved through: • Providing opportunities for more efficient allocation of resources, • Portfolio and risk diversification and • Allowing higher profitability of investment, as well as • By helping to promote domestic financial development, especially in developing countries (see World Bank 1997, Obstfeld 1998, Agenor 2003, Gourinchas and Jeanne 2003, Prasad, Rogoff, Wei and Kose 2004, Obstfeld and Taylor 2004, Klein 2005). Down-side • the risks of global financial integration outweigh the benefits (Bhagwati 1998). – ‘claims of enormous benefits from free capital mobility are not persuasive’ – ‘substantial gains (from capital account liberalization) have been asserted, not demonstrated’ • free international capital flows have been associated with a deterioration in economic efficiency (as measured by growth and unemployment) (Obstfeld & Taylor 2004:4) • Rodrik (1999:30) “openness to international capital flows can be especially dangerous if the appropriate controls, regulatory apparatus and macroeconomic frameworks are not in place”. • controversy remains since the studies obtained mixed results. Empirics from Aziakpono (2006 ), Sander and Kleimeier (2006) and Nielsen, et al. (2005) showed that: • by virtue of the official financial integration arrangements, the financial systems in the SACU countries are highly integrated. • provide opportunities for risk-sharing, domestic financial system development and economic growth. • there is still a wide disparity in the level of development of their financial systems and their economic performance. ASSIGNMENT- GROUP B
Write an empirical paper showing the effect of
financial integration on economic performance of SACU countries over a period ending 1970-2014 [50 marks]. Due last day of Block!