0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views

Notes 24

Uploaded by

javed alam
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views

Notes 24

Uploaded by

javed alam
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

notes24

In this way, even when individual elements do drop out of the


socio-production process, they still find themselves in a permanent
sphere of influence and are themselves in a permanent sphere of
influence and are themselves considered from the standpoint of
the social system of production; at the point of their maximum
isolation
• they are theoretically interesting as an object of social
attraction, as a potential constituent part of the new social
system. However, despite the fact that the objective-social
method is still valid, it does acquire a different logical tone.
In an analysis of the social structure of the capitalist
commodity model, all economic regularity expresses itself
in conforming to anarchic laws, ‘blind’ force, since the
entire socio-production process is irrational. In an analysis
of the structure of the transition period, the case is
somewhat different, because here the rationalization of
the socioeconomic process increases exponentially

You might also like