Time Management and Stress Management
Time Management and Stress Management
STRESS MANAGEMENT
Your time and you:
Techniques for improved
time management
Make a list
● Lists really do work if you use them.
● One of the most important things is to
make sure your list feels attainable.
● Prioritize yours and others’ needs and plan
accordingly.
● You might even want to make three lists —
personal, home and work.
Set deadlines
● Set a deadline and try your best to
stick to it.
● This allows for the possibility that
other things will get in the way, but
also allow for you still to get the
task done.
Stop multitasking
●
Multitaskers often seem to think
they get more accomplished, but
it’s not always the most
productive or efficient route.
● our minds work better when we
are truly able to focus and
concentrate on one thing.
Delegate responsibilities
● Delegation is not a sign of
weakness, but a sign of
intelligence.
● Find competent, reliable people
and share some of the
responsibilities.
Use your downtime
When you’re stressed, your muscles get tense. You can help loosen them up on
your own and refresh your body by:
● Stretching
● Enjoying a massage
● Taking a hot bath or shower
● Getting a good night’s sleep
3. Deep Breathing
Stopping and taking a few deep breaths can take the
pressure off you right away. You’ll be surprised how much
better you feel once you get good at it. Just follow these 5
steps:
● Meditation
● Yoga
● Prayer
● Listening to your favorite music
● Spending time in nature
7. Make Time for Hobbies
You need to set aside time for things you enjoy. Try
to do something every day that makes you feel good,
and it will help relieve your stress. It doesn’t have to
be a ton of time -- even 15 to 20 minutes will do.
Relaxing hobbies include things like:
● Reading
● Knitting
● Doing an art project
● Playing golf
● Watching a movie
● Doing puzzles
● Playing cards and board games
8. Talk About Your Problems
People can learn to manage stress and lead happier, healthier lives. Here are
some tips to help you keep stress at bay.
● Keep a positive attitude.
● Accept that there are events that you
cannot control.
● Be assertive instead of aggressive.
Assert your feelings, opinions, or
beliefs instead of becoming angry,
defensive, or passive.
● Learn and practice relaxation
techniques; try meditation, yoga for
stress management.
● Exercise regularly. Your body can fight
stress better when it is fit.
● Eat healthy, well-balanced meals.
● Learn to manage your time more
effectively.
● Set limits appropriately and learn to say no to
requests that would create excessive stress in
your life.
● Make time for hobbies, interests, and
relaxation.
● Get enough rest and sleep. Your body needs
time to recover from stressful events.
● Don't rely on alcohol, drugs, or compulsive
behaviors to reduce stress.
● Seek out social support. Spend enough time
with those you enjoy.
● Seek treatment with a psychologist or other
mental health professional trained in
stress management or biofeedback techniques
to learn healthy ways of dealing with the
stress in your life.
Causes and Effects of Stress
Anything that brings on feelings of stress is called a stressor. Today, people often face many stressors.
When you’re faced with stress, certain chemicals (hormones) in your body are released. These
hormones trigger many changes in your body. For instance, your:
If you’re often under stress, you need to learn to manage it well. Stress can affect your well-being. Over time, you may show
some of these symptoms of being stressed:
● Physical. Frequent colds or flu, headaches, trouble sleeping, muscle tension, skin problems, trouble with digestion
● Mental. Poor concentration, forgetfulness, learning problems, frequent negative thoughts, speech problems
● Emotional. Anxiety, depression, anger, irritability, feelings of helplessness, lack of purpose, relationship troubles
● Behavioral. Eating poorly, driving recklessly, abusing alcohol or drugs, being accident prone, showing aggression
Workplace Stress - Five Models
Job stress is heavily associated with workplace environment. Places like New York, Los Angeles, and
London among many other municipalities acknowledge the strong relationship between job stress and
heart attacks. Because workplace stress is the result of many complex interactions between an
individual and a large systematically-operating organization, there are numerous theories propagated
to explain the relation between both.
According to experts, there are five models that explain workplace stress, which are −
● Person Environment Fit Model
● Job Characteristics Model
● Diathesis-Stress Model
● Jobs-Demand Resources Model
● Effort-Reward Imbalance Model
Person Environment Fit Model
According to this model, a person starts to feel stress in a job where his aptitude, skills, abilities and
resources are in-line with the necessities of their job. The job profile he is operating in should be in
accordance to his needs, knowledge and skills-sets.
If these needs are not addressed, then it makes these employees “misfits” in that domain, which results in
lagging behind in performances and not meeting management expectations. These employees end up with
lower productivity, face isolation and resort to denial, as a defense mechanism.
Person–Environment Fit (PE fit) is defined as the degree to which individual and
environmental characteristics match.
Lesson: If you want someone to be satisfied with their job, committed to the
organization and not leave, then they need to be a good cultural fit with the job
requirements
Lesson 2: Person Organization Fit
● Person-Organization Fit is strongly correlated with job satisfaction (.44) and
organizational commitment (.51), and more moderately with intent to quit
(−.35)
● Lesson: It’s important for an employee to be a good cultural fit with the
company in order to be satisfied with the job and committed to the
organization
Lesson 3: Person Group Fit
Person-Group Fit is correlated with: job satisfaction (.31), organizational
commitment (. 19) and intent to quit (-.22)
Lesson: When a person (co-worker or job candidate) is aligned with their team in
terms of the way that they're hardwired to communicate, make decisions and
share common preferences for rewards their chances of thriving increases
exponentially
Lesson 4: Person Supervisor Fit
Person-Supervisor Fit had a stronger relationship with job satisfaction (.44) than
organizational commitment (.09)
Lesson: To keep someone happy at their job, they need to be a good cultural fit
with their boss
What can we learn from these lessons?
• Culture fit happens at the level of individual to manager, team, company and job.
• People with higher "fit scores" onboard faster, perform at higher levels, are more
engaged and stay with the company longer.
This model proposes that for an employee to be successful in any job, he needs to have some degree of autonomy and
he should be able to give a feedback which is heard. Such conditions result in job enrichment and employee loyalty. The
absence of these factors can cause work disassociation and drops in productivity.
This model also specifies that numerous talented professionals lose their aptitude towards the same work that they had
once been very interested in, and were good at. The main reason behind this was the attitude of the management.
THE JOB CHARACTERISTICS THEORY
● Hackman and Oldham, both organizational psychologists, developed the job
characteristics theory (JCT) and first introduced it in 1976 in the book “Organizational
Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 16, Issue 2”.
● According to this theory, “job design has an effect on motivation, work performance, and
job satisfaction.” It has served as a framework for management to identify how certain job
characteristics affect the outcomes of the jobs.
● In a more personal vein, it studies the various factors that make a specific job
satisfying for the organization, and for the person doing the job. Therefore, it
describes the relationship between job characteristics and the responses of individuals
to work or the job being performed.
● The Job Characteristics Theory identified five core job dimensions that prompt three
psychological states which, in turn, lead to or have an effect on five work-related
outcomes or results. As we move forward with the discussion, we will expound on
these further.
● Out of this theory, the Job Characteristics Model, which is still in full use today, was
also introduced. Basically, this model specifies the conditions under which workers
or individuals will be internally motivate to perform their jobs effectively.
THE JOB CHARACTERISTICS MODEL
The Job Characteristics Model was verified when Hackman and Oldham tested it on 658
employees, who are working in 62 different jobs in 7 different businesses or organizations. The
results were deemed to be reliable and conclusive, which is the reason why it still holds a lot of
weight today, despite the number of other job design theories introduced.
In order to get a full picture of the Job Characteristics Model,
we have to go break down its composition: the five core job
characteristics or dimensions, the five work-related outcomes,
and the three psychological states.
Five Core Job Characteristics
Hackman and Oldham provided clear definitions on the five job dimensions or characteristics.
Workers tend to find more meaning in their jobs when they can identify a complete and visible
outcome at the end of the day, or of a work cycle. Let us say, for example, that two workers are
involved in the same work process. Worker A is responsible for only a small part of the work,
probably in the first phase. Worker B, on the other hand, is involved throughout the entire
process.
Between the two, Worker B is more likely to find his job meaningful, because he can see a
visible outcome, and he feels more involved in the completion of the process. For him, a job
that he is able to complete, from beginning to end, seems more worthwhile, than simply
working on Phase 1, then not having a hand on the rest of the process. In fact, he may not even
be aware whether the process has been completed or not, because he is focused on his assigned
phase of the process.
Task significance
● Task significance is said to be the “degree to which the job has a
substantial impact on the lives of other people, whether those people
are in the immediate organization or in the world at large”. The task –
and the job – is significant if it can affect other people’s lives. And it
should not just be the people within the organization, but even those
outside.
● For many, a job holds more meaning if it can help improve the well-
being of other people (not just himself), whether physically,
psychologically, or emotionally. Knowing that their job, and their
performance thereof, has the capacity to have a positive impact on
others will motivate them further to do better.
● Individuals who put great stock on task significance are very keen on
finding out whether the job that they are doing actually matters to other
people. For them, meaning comes in the form of recognition by other
people.
4. Autonomy
● This pertains to the “degree to which the job provides substantial freedom,
independence, and discretion to the individual in scheduling the work and in
determining the procedure to be used in carrying it out”.
● Autonomy is often seen in positions with managerial, supervisorial and ministerial
functions. Examples of jobs with high levels of autonomy are managers, team leaders,
supervising officers, division and department heads, and senior management. These
jobs tend to become more meaningful to the ones performing them because they feel
greater personal responsibility for their own actions on the job.
● But it’s not just limited to people in managerial positions. Even workers have a strong
sense of personal responsibility if they are left to perform their tasks using their own
efforts and initiatives, and they are allowed to make the decisions and call the shots.
● They will definitely feel less of this autonomy if they are made to meekly follow the
instructions of a supervisor, or adhere strictly to what a job procedures manual
provides. This will not help them feel responsible for their actions at all.
5.Feedback
Job feedback refers to the
“degree to which carrying out the work activities required by the job provides the
individual with direct and clear information about the effectiveness of his or her
performance”.
● As much as possible, workers would like to be kept in the loop on their performance of the job.
● Not only will this keep them apprised of their progress as workers, it is also one way for them to boost
their self-esteem. If they are told by their supervisors or managers that they are going a good job, they
are likely to feel motivated to continue with how they are doing so far.
● In contrast, if they are told that they are not performing as expected, then they will respond
accordingly and improve their performance.
If all five characteristics are lumped or combined together, we will be able to come up with a single
figure or index that will act as the indicator of the overall motivating potential of the job being
evaluated or redesigned. This index will essentially show the possibility or likelihood of a job
affecting the attitudes and behaviors of the employee or worker.
This figure or index is called the MPS, or the “motivating potential score”.
Using all five core job characteristics, the formula for the MPS is:
· If all five core job characteristics are high, there is a high probability that the worker will
experience the three psychological states. This will naturally result to positive outcomes.
· In order for a job to be considered to have high motivating potential, at least one among Skill
Variety, Task Identity and Task Significance) should also be high. However, it is a given that the job
should also be high on both Autonomy and Feedback. A low score on any of the two will pull the
MPS down.
· A low score on any one of the three does not automatically mean that the job will have a low
motivating potential, since it could be offset by a high score on any of the other two.
Three Critical Psychological States
● According to Faturochman, the only way for the desirable outcomes to appear or materialize is for the
individual to experience all three psychological states, and the only way to experience these states, is
to possess the core job characteristics.
● Hackman and Oldham also mentioned motivation, which will definitely be high among individuals
who are able to experience these psychological states.
Psychological State 1. Experience meaningfulness of work
● Individuals have to feel that, when they are working, they
are doing something meaningful. They feel that their
work, in and of itself, is meaningful. This means that they
have to feel that what they are doing is generally
worthwhile or of value. It should also hold some
importance or significance, especially with respect to a
system or a set of values that the individual, on a personal
level, believes in or accepts.
● Looking at the diagram of the model, we can easily see
that there is a connection between meaningfulness of
work and the first three core job characteristics. In short,
a worker will be able to find more meaning in his job if
skill variety, task identity and task significance are
present.
Meaningfulness of work and Skill Variety:
● Not only should the job require a variety of skills and talents; it should also
have the appropriate number of skills and talents, and the appropriate skills
and talents.
● Basically, requiring too many skills and talents may make the job too
overwhelming and complex, so the worker will have difficulty keeping up
with it. On the other hand, a job that requires too little skills and talents may
make it too boring and not challenging at all.
● In the same vein, the skills and talents should be a fit for the job itself. There would
be no point requiring a skill or talent that will not contribute to the accomplishment
of a task.
● Take, for example, the job of a chauffeur. Driving is the most basic skill required of
him, but in many organizations, they may also require the driver to have mechanical
troubleshooting skills and a talent for making conversation, especially when the
nature of their job requires them to drive guests and visitors around the city.
Meaningfulness of work and Task Identity:
● The worker will feel more pride in their work when
they are able to identify it wholly and completely.
● Another example given in several write-ups is the
manufacture of a washing machine. In the assembly
line of a washing machine manufacturing company,
there is one worker whose only task is to add one nut
to one bolt, in the exact same spot. If he has to do this
one thing repetitively, throughout a six- to eight-hour
shift, he will be less motivated than, say, another
worker who is in charge of attaching the drum and
other parts.
Meaningfulness of work and Task Significance:
● Say, for example, that an employee is tasked to create project
proposals, with the knowledge that these proposals are likely
to be approved and implemented, and will result to the
company’s earnings increasing and, as a result, everyone’s
bonuses also going up.
● Task significance is going to be high, because the employee is
aware that the results of his job will benefit not only himself,
but other employees of the company as well. He will therefore
find his job more meaningful and will be more motivated to
come up with excellent project proposals
Psychological State 2. Experienced responsibility for
outcomes of the work
● We are not talking here of just about any type of responsibility. In
the context of the JCM, we are speaking of personal responsibility.
The individual has to feel personally accountable for the outcomes
or results of his work, or the tasks that he is doing.
● Freedom and autonomy is given in the performance of one’s job.
The worker will then use this freedom of action to make decisions
on how to perform the job, such as making changes in the process,
deciding on scheduling, and applying certain principles that he
deems appropriate and beneficial to the accomplishment of the
task.
● However, together with this freedom and autonomy is a sense of
responsibility. Depending on the decisions made by the worker, he
or she will be responsible for the results, whether it is a success or
a failure.
Psychological State 3. Knowledge of the actual results or outcomes
It is a given that knowing the results or outcomes of your job will help you track or monitor your
effectiveness in your job. It will also help you evaluate your job performance better.
1. It will ensure that the worker is fully aware of the success (or failure) of his work and, in the process,
allow them to learn from his mistakes.
2. It will allow the worker to connect, on an emotional level, with the customers or end users of their
outputs. Consequently, this will let them find more meaning in their work.
Now let us take these three psychological states and relate them with the core job characteristics.
The first three core job characteristics – skill variety, task identity and task significance – have a direct
impact on the individual worker’s experienced meaningfulness of work.
Meanwhile, the amount of autonomy he enjoys will have an effect on the individual’s experienced
responsibility towards work outcomes or results. The fifth core job characteristic – feedback – leads to the
individual gaining knowledge of the actual results of the work-related activities of the job.
Work-Related Outcomes
Originally, the proponents of the JCT proposed five possible work-related outcomes.
1. Internal Work Motivation: An employee may derive motivation to perform his work from external
sources. However, the best type of motivation would still be intrinsic motivation, which comes internally, or
naturally in a worker.
2. Job Satisfaction: The simple definition of job satisfaction is the level of contentment of an employee
with his or her job. Hulin and Judge, however, gave a more complex definition, referring to it as a multi-
dimensional psychological response to one’s job, and these responses could either be cognitive, affective or
behavioral.
3. Performance Quality: This outcome focuses on the overall quality of how the work was performed.
Was it effective? Was it efficient? Were the targets achieved? Were the standards of quality adhered to?
4. Absenteeism: A highly motivated worker will definitely register low absenteeism. Usually,
workers who are bored with their work, or not challenged at all, will not have the enthusiasm that
pushes them to get up each morning to go to work. They will not look forward to the work day
ahead and, as a result, are more than likely to just not go to work altogether. Of course, it goes
without saying that absenteeism is one of the primary reasons for low productivity.
5. Turnover: In any case, a company that registers a high turnover rate in personnel means that
there are problems on how its human resources are managed. It could be that the poor job design
does not motivate workers to stay long with the company. Thus, they will look for other jobs in
other companies or industries.
High turnover also means ultimately higher costs and inefficiencies for an organization. It means
they have to frequently recruit and hire people and train the ones that are hired. After a few
months, after the employees leave and new ones are hired, another round of training will take
place. This will definitely mean more training costs to the company, not to mention severance
packages for those who left.
In 1980, however, a revision of the theory and model had the number of outcomes going
from five to four. Absenteeism and turnover are removed, and performance quality is broken
down into two:
1. Quality of Work: How is the work performed? Are the standards of quality set by the
company met?
2. Quantity of Work: How much of the work was performed? Was the worker able to
complete the expected amount of work within the time allotted, without compromising on
quality?
The heart of the Job Characteristics Model entails designing (or redesigning) the job in a
manner where the core job characteristics are a perfect and complementary fit to the
individual’s or worker’s psychological state and, in the process, lead to the achievement of
positive and desired outcomes or results.
Moderators
● The theory is not all cut and dried, however, because even the brains behind the JCT recognized
that there will be varying responses to jobs that are deemed to have high motivating potential. In
short, some employees may respond positively, but there may also be those who would not be
affected in the same way.
● They addressed this gray area by pointing out that there are inherent traits or characteristics among
individuals that will help bridge that divide often seen between the job characteristics and the
psychological states. They called these the “moderators”.
1. Knowledge and skills needed to perform the work or task required in the
job
● The moderator is the level of knowledge and skill that the individual possesses, relevant to the job.
Individuals who possess the skills, knowledge and competence in their performance of their job are
more likely to feel positively towards their job and, in turn, this will pave the way for obtaining good
or better results.
● In contrast, if the person performing the job has insufficient knowledge and skill towards the job,
there is a low chance of him experiencing the psychological states. He can also expect less than
stellar, and even negative, results or outcomes.
2. Growth need strength
According to the theory, Growth Need Strength (GNS) moderates the relationship between core job characteristics and the
psychological states. At the same time, it also moderates the relationship between the psychological states and the possible results or
outcomes.
· How much does the individual hunger for personal learning and development?
“Growth need strength” is defined as the degree to which people have a need for personal growth and development. Individuals who
are “hungrier”, or those who have high growth need strength, are more likely to have a more enthusiastic response to various
opportunities that come their way. They have a greater thirst for personal accomplishment, and they will see the job as an excellent
tool for learning and development.
. “Context” satisfaction
● The context we are talking about here is “work context” or “job context”, and they often include
job security, pay or compensation, the co-workers, and the managers. It means that individuals
may be motivated by internal aspects, but that does not mean they completely ignore the
external ones.
● Individuals are also inclined to respond positively if they are satisfied by the contextual factors
mentioned. For example, if they feel that they are
being paid an amount commensurate to their job, then they will be more motivated to perform
better. If they are satisfied with the quality of leadership that the supervisor is demonstrating,
then they are also likely to improve their performance at work as part of the team.
● The rule of thumb is that, the higher the moderator levels are, the higher will also be the
likelihood of the three psychological states to be experienced by the individual.
● Individuals that exhibit high levels in the moderator variables (knowledge and skills, growth
need strength and work context satisfaction) are more likely to have a more positive response in
their experience of the psychological outcomes. This also means that they can expect better
outcomes or results
Diathesis-Stress Model
This model makes a distinction between stressful job conditions and individual strains. Strains can be mental, physical or
emotional and most of the times, these strains change from person to person.
The significant strains among them are −
● Excessive Workload
● Disagreeable Workplace Environments
● Lack of Autonomy
● Difficult Relationships with Coworkers
● Lack of Career Growth
● Low Chances of Personal Growth while Working and
● Harassment from Management.
Jobs-Demand Resources Model
This model posits that workplace stress can be associated to the difference of job demands and resources. Experienced
at managerial levels, it is caused when a bully management expects managers to deliver high results with low resources.
In other words, there is a severely skewed ration between job demands and job resources. Even good managers cannot
deal with this stress and end up stressed.
Effort-Reward Imbalance Model