Public Health Informatics MPHE 622: Kassim Kamara, M.Phil
Public Health Informatics MPHE 622: Kassim Kamara, M.Phil
MPHE 622
Public Health Informatics (PHI)
• How is PHI different from other informatics disciplines?
– A focus on prevention in populations
– Use of a wide range of interventions to achieve its goals
– Constraint by operating in a governmental context
• The challenge for public health informatics is how to enhance the delivery of high-
quality, contextually relevant content, focused on a broad range of data (such as
disease incidence, immunization rates, morbidity, mortality statistics, practice
guidelines, research findings, protocols, maps and images) so this content can be
used on the ground at the local, district and national levels.
Potential for public health informatics
• Communication among geographically dispersed health workers and consumers
• Delivery of public-health services by strengthening and streamlining data collection
• Support of primary and secondary prevention via electronic health records and
improved laboratory systems
• Data collection for research studies, such as drug and vaccine trials
• Environmental health interventions, such as biosurveillance, road safety and
geographic mapping systems applications
Public Health Informatics Impediments
• A lack of integrated, interoperable health information systems to support decision
making at all levels
• System fragmentation at the donor, NGO, ministries of health, clinics and hospital levels
• Capacity shortfalls in technical support and technology availability for day-to-day health
information systems tasks
• Data stewardship challenges, including the need to provide incentives for people to
collaborate on collecting and sharing accurate and useful data.
• The one-way flow of information that is sent upward, but not back to health workers on
the ground
• Too many vertical disease silos across health sectors
• Short donor-funding horizons and investments that are not long-term, coherent or
consistent
• Inconsistencies between “industrial” IT solutions and on-the-ground realities
• A need for national ownership
Evolution of Public Health Informatics in US
• 1995: PHI was first described as a needed distinct discipline (Friede)
• Late 1990s: The PHI “movement” gained momentum in the late 1990’s and early
2000’s
• 2001: Events of September 11 and subsequent anthrax attacks crystallized the
need for key PHI applications
Early PHI Applications
Syndromic surveillance
– Definition:
Concerned with “the continuous monitoring of public-health related information sources and
early detection of adverse disease events” (Yan et al., 2008)
– Utilizes information technology, statistical algorithms, data visualization
techniques to identify trends warranting public health attention
Potential Data Sources for Syndromic Surveillance
• Sales of over the counter drugs
• Visits to the emergency department for certain aliments
• Absentee data from schools
• Physician office visits
• Nurse hotline calls
• Dead bird reports
• Prescription from pharmaceuticals
• Internet searches (i.e. Google)
BioSense
BioSense is a US national program intended to support early outbreak
detection by conducting near real-time analysis of existing data from
healthcare organizations across the country
• Ambulatory data
• Emergency room diagnostic and procedural information
• Clinical laboratory test orders and results
• Over-the-counter drug sales
Hospitals Participating in BioSense and US Population Density
Local and State Efforts
• Many local syndromic surveillance systems have been implemented at
the local, county, and state levels
• Many focus on identifying trends indicating a possible bioterrorism
attack
– Anthrax –Tularemia
– Botulism toxins – Brucellosis
– Small pox – Hemorrhagic fever
– Plague – Viral encephalitides
– Q-fever – Staph. enterotoxin-B
Syndromic Surveillance for Special Events
• Olympic Games
• FIFA World Cup
• G8 summit
• World Series
• Super Bowl
• Kentucky Derby
• H1N1 Pandemic
Understands ideas
Understands
Envisions innovative capabilities,
scenarios opportunities, and
limitations
Policy
Security Data Standards
Creating a Public Health Information System
CMS = Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services; EHR = electronic health record; ELR = electronic laboratory record; HIE = health information exchange; HIPAA = Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act; HL7 = Health Level 7; ICD = International Classification of Diseases; SNOMED = Systematized Nomenclature of Human
Medicine; SQL = structured query language.
Step 1 — Vision and System Planning
Hardware
Software
Communication
Technology
Step 2 — Health Data Standards and Integration
•
Visualization and
implementation of the required
analysis, reporting, and
meaningful use of the data
collected and managed by the
system.
Informatician, Public Health Official, and Information Tech.
At the Intersection of the Informatician, the Public Health Official, and
the Information Technologist
Common Knowledge and Skills
THANKS