0% found this document useful (0 votes)
60 views

Copernicus

The document discusses Nicolaus Copernicus' heliocentric model of the solar system. It summarizes how Copernicus explained the motions of stars, sun, moon, and planets orbiting the sun. It also discusses the sizes and speeds of planetary orbits in the Copernican model compared to the Ptolemaic geocentric model. Finally, it outlines some of the advantages and disadvantages that Copernicus' model faced in gaining acceptance.

Uploaded by

Melo fi6
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
60 views

Copernicus

The document discusses Nicolaus Copernicus' heliocentric model of the solar system. It summarizes how Copernicus explained the motions of stars, sun, moon, and planets orbiting the sun. It also discusses the sizes and speeds of planetary orbits in the Copernican model compared to the Ptolemaic geocentric model. Finally, it outlines some of the advantages and disadvantages that Copernicus' model faced in gaining acceptance.

Uploaded by

Melo fi6
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

Announcements

• Homework 2 due today


• First midterm test next week (W or Th), in Science
Testing Center (SL 228); covers homework 1-3,
lectures through 9/18
• Questions on motion of the stars, sun, moon, or planets
as viewed from earth?
• First project is due one month from today!
• Polar graph paper is posted on web site
• Astrophotographers email me today if you haven’t
already
Aristotelian Physics and Chemistry

Terrestrial Series Celestial Series

Fi Fire
Et Ether

Ai Air (A pure, transparent,


luminous substance
Wa Water found only in the
heavens)

Ea Earth

“Gravity” = tendency of Earth and Water to sink toward


the center of the universe (opposite of “levity”)
Epicycles to explain retrograde motion

Epicycle

Planet

Earth

Deferent

Ptolemy also used minor epicycles, off-center circles, and


other geometrical tricks to explain details of planetary motion.
The Copernican Revolution
13 September 2006
Today:
• The Copernican model and how it
explains motions of stars, sun, moon,
planets
• Sizes and speeds of planetary orbits
• Reactions to Copernicanism
Nicolaus Copernicus (Mikolaj Koppernigk)
1473-1543
De Revolutionibus (“Revolutions”)
(published 1543)
Motion of Stars and Sun
(according to Copernicus)
Motion of Planets
(according to Copernicus)
Sizes of Planetary Orbits

Venus always
appears within
45º of the sun.

45º
Earth
1.0 A.U. 45º

1 A.U. = “Astronomical Unit”


= Earth-Sun distance
Sizes of Planetary Orbits

Venus

.
U
A.
7
0.
45º
Earth
1.0 A.U. 45º

1 A.U. = “Astronomical Unit”


= Earth-Sun distance
Speeds of Planetary Orbits

Earth • Venus crosses in front of


Venus
the sun every 1.6 years.
• During this time, Venus
must orbit 2.6 times.
• Set up a ratio to find time
for one orbit:
1.6 years x years
=
2.6 orbits 1 orbit

x = 1.6/2.6 years
= 0.62 years
Advantages of the Copernican model

• Explained motions of stars, sun, moon just as well as


the Ptolemaic model
• More natural explanation of planetary motion (no major
epicycles)
• Allowed calculation of sizes, speeds of planetary
motion
• Predicted positions more accurately (because more up
to date)
• Sphere of the stars no longer necessary!
Disadvantages of the Copernican model
• Still used minor epicycles (and other complications) to
predict exact planetary positions
• Not inherently more accurate than Ptolemaic scheme
• All motions still based on circles (made of “ether”?)
• Stars must be at huge distances, since otherwise we’d see
sizes of constellations change during the year.
• If the earth is moving so fast, why don’t we feel it?
• What about Aristotelian physics, gravity, etc.?
• If earth isn’t the center of the universe, does that make us
less important?
• If earth is part of the heavens, does this mean that the
heavens are made of ordinary stuff?
• Isn’t it simply ridiculous to turn the whole universe inside
out, just to help astronomers better understand the obscure
details of planetary motion?
If earth moves, why don’t constellations
seem to change size?
Reactions to Copernicus

• A few denunciations and rebuttals, mostly on religious


grounds (and mostly from Protestants, not Catholics)
• Mostly ignored until around 1600
• Meanwhile, astronomers used his book, whether they
believed the central hypothesis or not
• Gradually, more and more astronomers became
convinced
• “Victory by infiltration”

You might also like