Unit IV - OD Interventions
Unit IV - OD Interventions
INTERVENTIONS
Syllabus
1. Environmental appreciation
Changes in the world around us
Desirable and probable future
2. System analysis
History of the system
Analysis of the present system
Desirable future of the system
3. Integration of system and environment
Dealing with constraints
Strategies and action plans
Search conferences by companies
• Hewlett Packard -One plant used the Search to organize work so the
people would be able to see themselves as owners. In another HP facility
people were at the door of failure, the plant might be shut down. The SC
was used to bring people together, to make hard choices for survival
which entailed dropping four product lines and the jobs associated with
them in order to secure a meaningful future for the business.
• Ford Electronics -A Canadian facility conducted a search in 1982 to
determine how to survive in their marketplace. The result was a mindset
shift. Rather than making parts for Ford they determined to become a
learning lab for new technology and management practices that could be
exported to other Ford facilities. That led to redesign of the facility,
implementation of TQM, winning a prestigious quality award and
expansion of the plant from 900 to 1800 people.
Future search conference
A Future Search conference is a way for a
community or organization to create a shared
vision for its future. It engages a large group of
stakeholders who take part in a highly structured
process.
-
Future Search Conference
Future Search conferencing has emerged as a system-
wide strategic planning tool enabling diverse and
potentially conflicting groups to find common ground
for constructive action.
Future Search conferencing is a carefully designed
methodology linking inputs, activities, and outputs to
result in a vision built on (i) appreciation of an
organization’s history; (ii) acknowledgment of present-
day strengths and weaknesses; and (iii) considered
opinion about major opportunities in the future.
B. Beckard’s Confrontation Meeting
• Developed by Richard Beckard
• One day meeting of the entire management of
an organization in which they take a reading of
their own health
• In a series of activities, the management
group generates information about its major
problems, analyses the underlying causes,
develops action plans to correct problems.
Elements/Steps of Confrontation Meeting
A) Climate setting
B) Information collection
Each unit's representative writes his unit's entire results on a sheet paper,
which is displayed at a meeting hall.
Meeting leader provides some major categories in which all the data from
all the sheets can be classified.
E.g. If there are 100 items, the possibility is that these can be classified into
8-9 groups involving heading such as communication difficulties, problem
with top management etc.
With the meeting leader the participants go through the raw data on the
duplicated sheets and assign a category number to each element of data.
People assemble in their functional natural work units in for one or more
hours.
Thus HR members drawn from all level assemble in one unit, in technical
another and so on.
•It is required to discuss the problems and issues, which influence its areas of
work, and to ascertain the priorities and early actions to which the group is
willing to commit itself.
Elements/Steps of Confrontation Meeting
F) Immediate follow-up
G) Progress Review
• Robert Jacobs
• Six key steps
– Identify and clarify the basic important issues
facing the organization as a whole
– Agreeing on overall purpose of the change effort
– Deciding on who needs to be involved in the
change effort and how
– Determining how much influence these people
need to have over the development of this strategy
C. Real Time Strategic Change Intervention
• Robert Jacobs
• Six key steps
– Clarifying the information on quality work and
make wise decisions regarding their collective
future
– Exploring the methods, processes and approaches
that will boost and support people in making real
time strategic changes
D. Stream Analysis
E. MANAGERIAL GRID
By Robert Blake
1. Impoverished (Indifferent) Style (1.1) : In this
style, managers have low concern for both
people and production. Managers use this style
to preserve job and job seniority, protecting
themselves by avoiding getting into trouble. The
main concern for the manager is not to be held
responsible for any mistakes, which results in
less innovation decisions.
2. Country Club (Accommodating) Style (1.9) :
This style has a high concern for people and a
low concern for production. Managers using this
style pay much attention to the security and
comfort of the employees, in hopes that this will
increase performance. The resulting atmosphere
is usually friendly, but not necessarily very
productive.
3. Authority – Compliance (Dictatorial/
Produce/ Perish) Style (9.1) :
Managers using this style also pressure their
employees through rules and punishments to
achieve the company goals. commonly applied
by companies on the edge of real or perceived
failure. This style is often used in cases of crisis
management.
4. Middle-of-the-Road (Status quo) Style (5.5)
Balance and compromise. Managers using this
style try to balance between company goals and
workers' needs. By giving some concern to both
people and production, managers who use this
style hope to achieve suitable performance but
doing so gives away a bit of each concern so that
neither production nor people needs are met.
5. Team Management Style (Sound) (9.9)
contribute and commit. In this style, high
concern is paid both to people and production.
managers choosing to use this style encourage
teamwork and commitment among employees.
This method relies heavily on making employees
feel themselves to be constructive parts of the
company.
Structural Interventions
• Change efforts aimed at improving
organizational effectiveness through changes
in task, structural, technological and goal
process in the organization.
Some of the structural
interventions are….
a. Change in physical Setting
Once the employees are briefed about the general objectives, plan, and the
strategies to follow, the managers can start working with their subordinates
discussion where the subordinates will let the managers know about their
targets and which goals they can accomplish within a specific time and with
what resources. They can then share some tentative thoughts about which
Steps in Management by Objectives Process
4. Performance evaluation
Within the MBO framework, the performance
review is achieved by the participation of the
managers concerned.
Steps in Management by Objectives Process
5. Providing feedback
Steps in Management by Objectives Process
6. Performance appraisal
Performance reviews are a routine review of the
success of employees within MBO organizations.
Four Principles of MBO
First step in any MBO program should be
thorough diagnosis of the job, participants
and the needs of the organization
Requires involvement of superiors and
subordinates
Relies heavily on feedback
Benefits of MBO
• Effective short and long term planning
• A procedure for monitoring work progress and results
• Improved commitment to the organization because of
increased motivation, loyalty and participation of
employees
• Improved communication between superiors and
subordinates
• An improved organizational climate in general that
encourages improvements in performance
Socio- Technical Interventions
Socio- Technical Interventions
• Socio-technical theory has at its core the idea that the
design and performance of any organisational system
can only be understood and improved if both ‘social’
and ‘technical’ aspects are brought together and
treated as interdependent parts of a complex system.
• Organisational change programmes often fail because
they are too focused on one aspect of the system,
commonly technology, and fail to analyse and
understand the complex interdependencies that
exist.
Socio- Technical Interventions
Within a socio-technical systems perspective, any
organisation, or part of it, is made up of a set of
interacting sub-systems.
Thus, any organisation employs people with
capabilities, who work towards goals, follow processes,
use technology, operate within a physical
infrastructure, and share certain cultural assumptions
and norms.
A. Systems Analysis
• Organization should study the environment,
socio-economic factors like prevailing standard
of living, social demands on employees,
aspirations of children etc.
• Should design a reward system according to
the above factors
• System should be evolved to generate
enthusiasm which will help in growth
A. Systems Analysis
• Systems which need attention
– Recruitment system
– Reward system
– Appraisal system
– Training and Development
– Mission and growth potential
– Technical upgradation
– Social Recognition
B. Flexible Work Hours
• Work should be assigned based on timings.
• All resources should be available and no
interference of seniors should be there
• Total autonomy should be provided
• Should not have problem managing their
work-family interface
C. Job Sharing
• Sharing of work within the organization and
tie up with other organizations
• Particularly required for research and
development branch of organization
• Optimum utilization of resources can be
achieved
• This facility will help employees to attain their
targets
D. Job Evaluation and Role Analysis
Techniques
• An individual has to play different roles in
organization
• Should be trained to handle more than one
job
• Job redesign, Job rotation, Job simplification,
Job automation are some of the methods
Conditions for optimal success
of OD
Recognition by top level management that Organization
has problems
Use of an outside OD consultant
Systematic diagnosis of the problem areas which
induces an analysis of specific problems
A realistic long –term time perspective by the top level
management
Support and involvement of managers at all levels in the
organization
Active involvement of work group leaders