Pop Lecture 106
Pop Lecture 106
Topic 1
Why do economists want to explain demographic
behaviour? Transition theory and the Malthusian model
Sriya Iyer
Faculty of Economics and St. Catharine’s College
University of Cambridge
Contents
Recent demographic patterns in developing economies
Specific population debates in India, China, Kenya, the Middle East and Sub-Saharan Africa
2
Why do economists want to explain demographic behaviour?
Contemporary population debates echo what Malthus set out on 7 June 1798 in the Preface to his
An Essay on the Principle of Population:
‘It is an obvious truth…that population must always be kept down to the level of the means of
subsistence… and it is a view of these means which forms the strongest obstacle in the way to any
very great future improvement of society.’
3
What are the main trends in population growth throughout the last two
millennia?
Year World Pop Year World Pop Year World Pop Year World Pop
Natural population increase occurs when the birth rate is higher then the death rate
Growth rate: Worldwide population growth rate is 1.5% per year, and this is expected to continue
Size: In absolute numbers, the population is growing by about 230,000 people a day
4
5
What are the differences between historical trends in population
growth and current trends in global population?
The result: very high rates of population growth of 3-4% a year. 20C LDC fertility is 150% greater
than the maximum achieved in 19C.
Post 1960 and ‘demographic momentum’: birth rates have also been declining rapidly in most
LDCs.
Strong regional differences: between LDCs, Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East
6
What is the empirical association between population and economic
development?
Region Average Fertility GNP per capita ($)* Inverse relationship: higher average income
Rate (1995) (1995) <=> lower fertility. Sub-Saharan Africa (4-6
Sub-Saharan Africa 5.7 490 children) vs. East Asia and Latin America (2-3
children).
Middle East and 4.2 1780
North Africa
South Asia 3.5 350
Outliers: Middle East, China, India
Latin America and 2.8 3320 Faster growth during the 20C than during the
the Caribbean
19C, particularly in LDCs.
East Asia and the 2.2 800
Pacific
Related to the balance between trends in
Europe and Central 2.0 2220
Asia mortality and fertility.
China 1.9 620
Direction of causation between population and
India 3.2 340 development unclear
World 2.9 4880
7
Is population growth good or bad for economic development?
Improvement in development indicators: World food production, infant survival, life expectancy at
birth, literacy have all improved despite rapid population growth
Models of endogenous growth: new ideas or knowledge are main source of economic growth;
population growth increases markets for goods and services.
Is a collection of reasoned decisions at the individual level always optimal at the collective level?
8
What are the major sources of possible negative externalities of high
fertility and fast population growth?
Environmental externalities (esp. well-defined property rights) and the ‘tragedy of the commons’
9
10
What demographic patterns does ‘demographic transition’ theory
identify?
‘Stage I = High birthrates & high deathrates
– typical birthrate 35 per 1000,
– typical deathrate 30 per 1000.
– slow population growth of 0.5% p.a.
Stage II = modernization
– Deathrates fall from 30 per 1000 to 20 per 1000
– life expectancy rises from <40 to >60
– Birthrates stay high (35 per 1000)
– fast pop. growth of 1.5% p.a.
11
What are the problems with ‘demographic transition’ theory?
Differences in transition for some present-day LDCs from the western European experience
First difference in Stage I. Before 1950, LDCs had birthrates (at 43 per 1000) & deathrates (at
37 per 1000) much higher than Europe at same stage
Second difference in Stage II. Deathrate did begin to fall in most LDCs from 1950. But much
faster than in 19C LDCs to 10 or 15 per 1000. So, instead of growing only at 1.5% p.a., 20C LDC
populations grew at 2-2.5% p.a
Third and most crucial difference is in Stage III. Consider 2 cases A and B on diagram.
Majority of LDCs (sub-Saharan Africa) still in Case B. Failure to experience entire mortality
decline of Stage II because of widespread & persistent poverty
12
Thomas Robert Malthus (1766-1834)
13
How did Malthus explain the relationship between population and
economic development?
‘The view that he has given of human life has a The Malthusian model:
melancholy hue, but he feels conscious that he
has drawn these dark tints from a conviction Population grows at a geometric rate
that they are really in the picture, and not from
a jaundiced eye or an inherent spleen of Food supply grows at an arithmetic rate
disposition. The theory of mind which he has
sketched accounts for the existence of most of The ‘very striking consequence’: per capita
the evils of life!’ incomes fall to subsistence
Thomas Robert Malthus, An Essay on the Avoid absolute poverty by indulging in ‘moral
Principle of Population (1798) restraint’
14
What 3 assumptions underlie the ‘population trap’ theory?
Point A = Malthusian ‘population trap’ level of income is attained, economy stuck at chronic low income, Y1.
15
16
How do we get out of the Malthusian trap?
17
The views of Malthus’ contemporaries
‘It begins with the assumption that population tends to increase in a geometrical ratio while
subsistence can at best be made to increase in only an arithmetic ratio – an assumption just as
valid, and no more so, than it would be, from the fact that a puppy doubled the length of his tail
while he added so many pounds to his weight, to assert a geometric progression of the tail and an
arithmetic progression of the weight… the savants of a previously dogless island might deduce the
‘very striking consequence’ that by the time the dog grew to a weight of fifty pounds his tail would
be over a mile long and extremely difficult to wag, and hence recommend the prudential check of a
bandage as the only alternative to the positive check of constant amputations.’
18
Can we draw lessons from Malthusian theory today?
But, Malthusian theories are flawed by the assumptions of diminishing returns and of a positive
income effect on fertility
=> We need a better theory of the relationship between population and economic
development!
19
Useful Reading (the most important are starred)
On the relation between population and development J.-C. Chesnais, The Demographic Transition: Stages, Patterns
and Economic Implications. Oxford: Oxford University Press
(1992).
*A. C. Kelley, ‘Economic consequences of population change in
the Third World’, Journal of economic literature 26 (1988).
A. J. Coale and S. C. Watkins, The Decline of Fertility in Europe.
Princeton: Princeton University Press (1986).
*N. Birdsall, ‘Analytical approaches to population growth’, in H.
Chenery & T. N. Srinivasan (eds.), Handbook of development
economics vol. 1 (1988).
On the Malthusian model
P. Dasgupta, ‘The population problem: Theory and evidence’,
Journal of economic literature 33, 1879-1902 (1995). T. R. Malthus, An Essay on the Principle of Population, P. James
(ed.) 2 volumes, Cambridge (1989).
World Bank, World development report 1984: Population (1984).
S. Hollander, The Economics of Thomas Robert Malthus, Studies
World Bank, Beyond economic growth Chapter III on ‘World in Classical Political Economy IV, University of Toronto Press
Population Growth’ (2000). (1997), esp. 13-69.
On demographic transition theory *D. R. Weir, ‘Malthus’s theory of population’, in J. Eatwell et al.
(eds.), The new Palgrave: Economic development (1987),
236-231.
*J. C. Caldwell, ‘Towards a restatement of the demographic
transition theory’ Population and Development Review 2(3-4),
321-366 (1976).
20