Final Lesson 9 Basic Concepts of Apportionment and Voting
Final Lesson 9 Basic Concepts of Apportionment and Voting
and Voting
Adapted from Prof. Memije-
Cruz, Liwayway (2019)
Special Lecturer at College of
Arts and Sciences, Baliuag
University
Apportionment and Voting
Objectives:
• Discuss the history of apportionment and the fairness of these
apportionments.
• Describe the several voting methods, the “fairness” of these
methods, how votes are apportioned or divided among
voters.
• Appreciate the apportionment and voting concepts.
Apportionment
https://study.com/academy/lesson/hamiltons-method-
of-apportionment-in-politics.html
Hamilton Plan
The given total number of seats is to be apportioned between
several states proportionally to their populations. To accomplish
that task according to Hamilton,
Compute the divisor D = (Total population)/(Number of seats)
Find and round down state quotas {(State
population)/D}. The leftover fractional parts add up to a
whole number of seats.
Distribute the surplus seats, one per state, starting with
the largest leftover fractional part, then proceeding to the
next largest, and so on, until all the surplus seats have been
dealt with.
Consider a fictitious country called Kolob with a population
of 33,000 and having twelve states. The population of each
state is given below:
Hamilton Plan
To determine the number of representatives of each state
under the Hamilton method, we first divide the total
population (33,000) by the number of representatives (70).
This number is called the standard divisor.
Hamilton Plan
Table 6.2
From the results in the table,
the standard sub-quotas
totalled to 65, five
representatives short as
required by the Kolob’s
Constitution. When this
happens the Hamiltonian
Plan remediates by assigning
one representative to the
state with the largest
decimal remainder. This is
repeated until the required
number of representative is
attained
Jefferson’s Method of Apportionment
https://study.com/academy/lesson/jeffersons-method-
of-apportionment-in-politics.html
The Jefferson Plan
Table 6.4:
When the
modified
standard
divisor
(MSD) is
equal to
450
Table 6.5 :
When the
modified
standard
divisor
(MSD) is
equal to
400.
Adam’s Method of Apportionment
Back in the 1830s, John Quincy Adams had an issue with the
method of apportionment used in the House of
Representatives. Apportionment means the method used to
assign voting seats on a governing board to entities with
voting rights.
He felt that the method of apportioning votes at that time
was biased and favored large states. So, he proposed his
own method, the Adams Method of Apportionment, which
proposed that a modified divisor should be selected such
that when the sum of the Upper Quotas is tallied, it equals
the exact number of seats to be apportioned.
John Quincy Adams
https://study.com/academy
/lesson/adams-method-of-
apportionment-in-
politics.html
Adam’s Method of Apportionment
Adam’s Method of Apportionment
Apportionment: Webster’s Method
https://www.youtube.c
om/ watch? Daniel Webster
v=ZNybGTvz_hQ
Webster Method of Apportionment
Table 6.8
Huntington-Hill Method of
Apportionment
https://study.com/academy/lesson/huntington-hill-
method-of-apportionment-in-politics.html
Huntington-Hill Method of
Apportionment
nvention/hamilton.html
http://consource.org/document/the-hamilton-plan-1787/
http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/jefferson/jefffed.html
Videos
https://study.com/academy/lesson/hamiltons-method-
of-apportionment-in-politics.html
https://study.com/academy/lesson/jeffersons-method-
of-apportionment-in-politics.html
https://study.com/academy/lesson/adams-method-of-
apportionment-in-politics.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNybGTvz_hQ
https://study.com/academy/lesson/huntington-hill-
method-of-apportionment-in-politics.html