Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)
Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)
Responsibility (EPR)
Chetan Dhall
PGPSM07006
EPR Defined:
Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) is a policy approach under which producers are
given a significant responsibility – financial and/or physical – for the treatment or disposal
of post-consumer products. (OECD)
Internalize the environment costs of products into their price.
Shift the economic burden of managing products that have reached end of their useful life
from local government to product producers and consumers.
https://www.corpseed.com/knowledge-centre/The-Procedure-of-Extended-Producer-Responsibility-(EPR)-Authorization
Waste and EPR
Increasing Waste Quantities
Need for improved waste management and resource efficiency
Shift from linear to circular ,close material loops
https://www.plasticsforchange.org/epr-credits
EPR IN E-Waste
Chemicals found in e-waste that are dangerous to human health and the environment
Lead found in the screens of phones, TVs can damage kidneys, nerves, blood, bones and muscles
Mercury in flat screen TVs, laptop screens can cause damage to the kidneys and the nervous system
Challenges faced :
In India over 95% of E-waste is collected by informal sector waste picker and aggregator
After collection they sell their E-waste to informal sector recycler
Informal sector Recycler :Use Crude Method for Recycling
Lack of Responsible Recycler: Existing have little recycling capacity
https://www.oecd.org/environment/extended-producer-responsibility.htm
Advantages:
Producers facing financial burden of recycling their electronics after use, this may incentivized them
to design more sustainable, less toxic and more easily recyclable electronics
The pressures placed on governments may be alleviated
EPR policy puts pressure on countries that export their E-waste
China stopped importing E-waste from the U.S.
Forces countries to have their own infrastructure and will force more regulations from the government
Disadvantages:
EPR could increase the cost because producers would add recycling costs into the initial price tag
It can be expensive if the product contains hazardous materials and does not have a scrap value
Manufacturers may use takeback programs to take secondhand electronics off the reuse market, by
shredding rather than reusing or repairing goods
EPR In India:
Rules notified in 2011,came into force in 2012 for e-waste
Implemented the EPR guidelines in 2016 covering plastic packaging waste and electronic
waste
EPR Registration in India has been recently mandated by the Central Pollution Control
Board of India
PRO(Responsibility delegated to 3rd Party) in India:
Earth Sense Recycle Pvt. Ltd
EPR Compliance Pvt. Ltd.
Pegasus Support System Pvt. Ltd