This document provides information about the livelihoods of various tribal groups in India. It discusses how some tribes practiced shifting cultivation or jhum cultivation, others were hunters and gatherers, some herded animals, and some took to settled cultivation. It then describes how British colonial rule impacted tribal communities and ways of life. The British tried to sedentarize shifting cultivators and asserted control over forests. This disrupted traditional tribal practices and livelihoods. The document also provides details about the life and resistance movement of Birsa Munda, who led a tribal uprising against colonial oppression in the late 1800s in modern day Jharkhand.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
109 views
Army Public School, Mhow: SST Assessment
This document provides information about the livelihoods of various tribal groups in India. It discusses how some tribes practiced shifting cultivation or jhum cultivation, others were hunters and gatherers, some herded animals, and some took to settled cultivation. It then describes how British colonial rule impacted tribal communities and ways of life. The British tried to sedentarize shifting cultivators and asserted control over forests. This disrupted traditional tribal practices and livelihoods. The document also provides details about the life and resistance movement of Birsa Munda, who led a tribal uprising against colonial oppression in the late 1800s in modern day Jharkhand.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 13
Army Public School, Mhow
SST Assessment
Submitted by:- Submitted to:-
Kritika ray Mr. Mayank prasad 8th-A LIVELIHOOD OF TRIBAL GROUPS • SOME WERE JHUM CULTIVATORS (SHIFTING CULTIVATOR) Jhum cultivators are found hilly and forested tracts of north – east and central india. The lives of these tribal people depended on free movement within forests and on being able to use the land and forests for growing their crops. That is the only way they could practise shifting cultivation. This was done on small patches of land ,mostly in forest. The cultivators cut the treetops to allow sunlight to reach the ground, and burnt the vegetation on the land to clear it for cultivation. They spread the ash from the firing, which contained potash, to fertile the soil. They used the axe to cut trees and the hoe to scratch the soil in order to prepare it for cultivation. they broadcast the seeds, that is, scattered the seeds on the field instead of ploughing the land and sowing the seeds. Once the crop was ready and harvested, they moved to another field. A field that had been cultivated once was left fallow for several years. • SOME WERE HUNTERS AND GATHERS Some tribal groups were hunter and gathers they lived by hunting animals and gathering forest produce. The khond were such a community living in orissa. They went out and collective hunts and then divided the meat amongst themselves. They ate fruits and roots collected from forest and cooked food with the oil they extracted from seeds of sal and mahua. Shrubs and herbs are used for medicine purpose. Flowers of kusum and palash are used for colour clothes and leather. At other times they bought goods with the small amount of earing the had, some of them did odds jobs in the villages, carring loads or building roads, while other are farmers. Tribal groups often needed to buy and sell in order to be able to get the goods that were not produced within the locality. But the interest charged on the loans was usually very high. • SOME HERDED ANIMALS Many tribal groups lived by herding and rearing animals. They were pastoralists who moved with their herds of cattle or sheep according to the seasons. Example –van Gujar's of the Punjab, labadis of Andhra Pradesh were cattle herders, gaddis of kulu were shepherds, bakarwals of kashmir reared goats.
• SOME TOOK TO SETTLED CULTIVATION
Before the nineteenth century,many from within the tribal groups had begun settling down.The mundas of chottangpur, the land belonged to the clan as a whole.All members of the clans were regarded as descendants of the original settlers, who had first cleared the land. British officials saw settled tribal groups like the gonds and santhals as more civilised than hunter-gatherers or shifting cultivators. SOME TRIBAL GROUPS IN INDIA • Gaddis van gujjars • Bhotia • Saharia • Bhil • Van gujjars Rathwa • Banjara • Koya banjara gonds • Mala irular • Biagas banjara gonds • Baigas maria gonds • Santhai munda oraon santhal • Hajang • Khasi • Naga • Apatani nishi • Riang COLONIAL RULE AND IT’S AFFECT ON TRIBAL LIVES • WHAT HAPPENED TO TRIBAL CHIEFS Before the arrival of the british, in many areas the tribal chiefs were important people. They enjoyed a certain amount of economic power and had the right to administer and control their territories. They were allowed to keep their land titles over a cluster of villages and rent out lands, but they lost much of their administrative power and were forced to follow laws made by british official india. They also had to pay tribute to the british, and discipline groups on behalf of the british. They lost the authority they had earlier enjoyed amongst their people, and were unable to fulfil their traditional functions • WHAT HAPPENED TO THE SHIFTING CULTIVATORS The british were uncomfortable with groups who moved about and did not have a fixed home. They wanted tribal groups to settle down and become peasant cultivators. Settled peasants were easier to control and administration than people who were always move. The british also wanted a regular revenue source for the state. The british effort to settle jhum cultivators was not very successful. Settled plough cultivation is not easy in areas where water is scarce and the soil is dry .The british had to ultimately allow them the right to carry on shifting cultivation in some parts of the forest. •FOREST LAWS AND THEIR IMPACT Tribal groups are directly connected to the forests. In forest laws had a considerable effect on tribal lives. The british extended their control over all forests and declared that forests were state property. Some forests were classified as reserved forests for they produced timber which the british wanted. In these forests people were not allowed to move freely. But once the british stopped the tribal people from living inside forests, they faced a problems. Colonial officials came up with a solution. They decided that they would give jhum cultivators small patches of lands in the forests and allow them to cultivate these on the condition that those who lived in the villages would have to provide labour to the forest department and look after the forests .Many tribal groups reacted against the colonial forest laws. They disobeyed new rules, continued with practices that were declared illegal. • THE PROBLEM WITH TRADE Tribal groups found that traders and money lenders were coming into the forests more often ,wanted to buy forest produce, offering cash loans, and asking them for wages. The growers were paid rs 3to rs 4 for a thousand cocoons. These were then exported to buedwan or gaya where they were sold at five times the price. The middlemen — so called because they arranged deals between the exporters and silk growers made huge profits. The silk growers earned very little. Understandably, many tribal groups saw the market and the traders as their main enemies. • THE SEARCH FOR WORK The plight of the tribals who had to go far away from their homes in search of work was even worse .From the late nineteenth century, tea plantations started coming up and mining became important industry. Tribals were recruited in large numbers to work the tea plantations of assam and the coal mines of jharkhand. They were recruited through contractors who paid them miserably low wages, and prevented them from returning home. BIRSA MUNDA Birsa munda was born in mid of -1870s .The son of poor father, he grew up around the forests of bohonda, grazing sheep, playing the flute, and dancing in the local akhara. Forced by poverty, his father had to move from place to place looking for work. As an adolescent, birsa heard tales of the munda uprising of the past and saw the sirdars (leaders) of the community urging the people to revolt. They talked of a golden age when the mundas had been, free of the oppression of dikus. Mundas to attain the kingdom of heaven, and regain their lost rights. Later birsa also spent some time in the company of a prominent vaishnav preacher. Birsa was deeply influenced by many of the ideas he came in touch with in his growing-up years. His movement was aimed at reforming tribal society. He urged the mundas to give up drinking liquor, clean their village, and stop believing in witchcraft and sorcery. But we must remember that birsa also turned against missionaries and hindu landlords. He saw them as outside forces that were ruining the munda way He talked of a golden age in the past- a satyug (the age of truth) — when mundas lived a good life, constructed embankments, tapped natural springs, planted trees and orchards, practised cultivation to earn their living. They did not kill their brethren and relatives. They lived honestly. Birsa also wanted people to once again work on their land, settle down and cultivate their fields. The land policies of the british were destroying their traditional land system, hindu landlords and moneylenders were taking over their land, and missionaries were criticising their traditional culture. As the movement spread the british officials decided to act. They arrested birsa in 1895, convicted him on charges of roting and jailed him for two years. Birsa was released in 1897 he began touring the villages to gather support .He used traditional symbols and language to rouse people, urging them to destroy “ravana” (dikus and the europeans) and establish a kingdom under his leadership. They attacked police stations an churches ,and raised the white flag as a symbol of birsa raj.In 1900 birsa died of cholera and the movement faded out. The movement was significant in at last two ways. It forced the colonial government to introduce laws so that the land of the tribals could not be easily taken over by dikus. Second-it showed once again that the tribal people had the capacity to protest against injustice and express their anger against colonial rule. They did this in their own specific way, inventing their own rituals and symbols of struggle. THANK YOU