Bio Diesel
Bio Diesel
Advantages of Biodiesel
Energy Security and Balance: biodiesel has a positive energy
balance, For example: soybean Biodiesel yields 4.56 units of
energy for every unit of fossil energy consumed over its life
cycle.
Air Quality: Using biodiesel reduces life cycle emissions
because carbon dioxide released from biodiesel combustion is
offset by the carbon dioxide absorbed from growing soybeans or
other feed stocks used to produce the fuel. Life cycle analysis
completed by Argonne National Laboratory found that B100 use
reduces carbon dioxide emissions by 74% compared with
petroleum diesel.
Table 1: Energy Life-Cycle Assessment of Soybean Biodiesel,
Engine Operation :Biodiesel improves fuel lubricity and raises United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural economic
the Cetane number of the fuel. Report Number 845
shortage due to high demand of crude petroleum, nearly 4.77 million barrels per day Source: International
Energy Statistics
• Not Suitable for Use in Low Temperatures as it gels in cold weather depending upon fat or oil used for its
production.
• Increased use of Fertilizers for production can cause damage to soil and water resources in long term.
Balat (2017) made a detailed report about latest energy trend on global
level. Between 2000 and 2017, biofuel production increased 10-fold
from 16 billion to 143 billion liters. According to Rezania (2019) By
2016, the worldwide biodiesel production was over 32.6 million tons.
Moreover, the global biofuel market is estimated to grow at an annual
growth rate of 5.4% from 2017 to 2024, and the worldwide capacity of
biodiesel production is anticipated to reach 12 billion gallons by 2020.
LITERATURE REVIEW (Contd)
Ahmed (2019) emphasized that since biodiesel is produced exclusively by vegetable
oil, animal fat, microbial oil, and waste oil, it is renewable and biodegradable. Even
though it has various benefits over conventional diesel fuel, yet numerous technical
challenges need to be resolved. Among them are the cost of oil, selection of appropriate
catalysts, and the development of a suitable technique for economical and efficient
synthesis of biodiesel fuel from the vast range of available feedstocks. As 60-80% cost
of biodiesel is due to its feedstock, selection of low cost and sustainable feedstock from
the vast varieties of available sources is the most challenging task to be achieved.
In the analytical study by Athar (2020) , the literature of the last twenty years was
thoroughly studied and reviewed to examine the status of biodiesel. This paper
discussed the availability of different biodiesel feedstocks and summarizes how their
characteristics affect biodiesel properties along with the criteria of their selection for
sustainable and low-cost production of biodiesel. . The review concludes with future
perspectives and suggestions regarding the selection criteria of feedstocks, catalysts,
and production techniques to make the production of biodiesel cost-effective, fast,
energy-efficient, more cleaner, less complex, and sustainable.
LITERATURE GAP
After reviewing all the research paper relevant to this topic, we were able
to identify the most common and widely used feedstocks for biodiesel
production. An important thing that we noted is substantial difference in
biodiesel yield with variation in every specification associated with the
biodiesel production. Temperature and catalyst played the most crucial role
in the conversion process as slight difference in these conditions can lead
to different results. Considering the importance of all these variables on the
final yield percentage, and lack of tool or program that does contain all the
necessary information regarding the production of biodiesel, we decided to
develop a MATLAB program which can give us detailed description about
parameters required to be maintained for Biodiesel production from
various feedstocks and it does estimate the biodiesel yield. For the program
to give accurate and real results, we have studied more than 35 feedstocks
from a fair amount of research papers and publications, and then made an
attempt to compile all the information linked with biodiesel production
under a single user friendly interface.
FEEDSTOCK
There are different potential feedstocks for biodiesel
production. The following feedstocks have been studied for
conditions required and leading to different biodiesel yield
from same feedstock owing to variation in parameters:
Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas L. is a small tree or large shrub, up to5–7m tall. It is a drought- resistant plant capable of surviving in abandoned and
fallowed agricultural lands. It is well adapted in arid and semi-arid conditions and has low fertility and moisture demand. It reaches its
maximum productivity by 5 years and can live 30–50 years. Seed production ranges from 0.1 t per hectare per year to more than 8ton per
hectare per year depending on the soil conditions. A research study by Atabani (2013) showed that one hectare of Jatropha curcas could
capture up to 25 tons of CO2 from the atmosphere every year (over a 20-year period).
Karanja
Pongamia pinnata, commonly known as karanja, is a medium-sized glabrous, perennial tree . Doshi (2013) found that the yield of oilseed
per tree is between 8 and 24 kg. The seeds of Pongamia pinnata contain around 30%–40% of oil. Pongamia pinnata oil is considered to be
less toxic and cheaper than Jatropha curcas oil, so it has become the subject of biodiesel research. Most of the physical and chemical
properties of the Pongamia pinnata oil are similar to those of the diesel fuel, however this oil is more viscous and produce higher carbon
residue. The seed oil content ranges between 30 and 40 wt%.
Mahua
Madhuca indica, commonly known as mahua or butternut tree, grows to a height of 10–15m. It belongs to the family Sapotaceae. The
Madhuca indica tree starts producing seeds after 10 years and continues for up to 60 year. An average yield of 800 kg/ha can be expected in a
Mahua plantation after a decade. From his work, Panigrahi (2014) concluded each tree yields about 20–40 kg of seed per year. Madhuca
indica seed contains 35% oil and 16% protein .
Castor
It originates in Africa but it is found in both wild and cultivated states in all the tropical and subtropical countries of the world. Castor is a
small wooden tree that can reach a height of about 6m. The comparative advantage of Castor is that its growing period is much shorter than
that of Jatropha curcas and Karanja. Deligiannis (2009) considers castor is an ideal candidate for production of high value, industrial oil
feedstocks because of the very high oil content (48%–60%) of the seed, and the extremely high levels of potential oil production (500–1000 l
of oil/acre). Castor oil contains more oxygen than other oils and, therefore, Castor is oil and its derivatives are more soluble in alcohols
during the transesterification reactions
Neem
Neem tree is a majestic, evergreen, tropical forest tree, with a broad crown and a height of approximately 25 m. Neem tree normally begins
to bear fruit between 3 and 5 years and becomes fully productive in 10 years. Heroor (2013) said that from the 10th year onwards, it can
produce up to 50 kg of fruits annually. Neem seeds contain about 45% of a brownish-yellow of fixed oil, mainly constituted by oleic acid
(34.01%), palmitic acid (12.1%), stearic acid (12.95%), linoleic acid (38.26%).
Jojoba
Kant (2010) said that this plant can yield 10kg of seed per year after 10 years . It is unique among plants in the fact that its seeds
contain about 50% of oil by weight, which is more than amount in soybean and somewhat more than in most oil seed crops. Jojoba oil
is practically colorless and odorless and it is composed mainly of straight chain monoesters of C20 and C22 acids and alcohols with
two double bonds.
Jojoba 866
Acid number: The acid number is a measure of the
Karanja 890
amount of carboxylic acid groups in a chemical
Jatropha 880
compound, such as a fatty acid, or in a mixture of
compounds. From research conducted by Ramos 800 820 840 860 880 900 920 940
(2009) we can say that acid number can provide an
indication of the level of lubricant degradation
Fig. 6: Calorific Value (MJ/kg)
while the fuel is in service. Acid value or 50 47.38
neutralization number is expressed as mg KOH 45.5
45
required to neutralize 1g of fatty acid methyl 41.17
39.4 39.81
40 38.7
esters. Higher acid content can cause severe 35.56 36.5
corrosion in fuel supply system and internal 35
combustion engine. Lowest acid number is 30
0.001mgKOH/g for Terminalia catappa (Tropical 25
almond) and the highest is 2.141mgKOH/g for 20
Cuphea viscosissima (waxweed).
15
• The cloud point of alkyl ester synthesized from oils like soybean, linseed and
corn have been very low or close to 0°C as the amounts of saturated fatty acids like
palmitic acid, and stearic acid present is negligible. However, the cloud point of
biodiesel produced from tallow is higher than the biodiesel obtained from soybean
because of the presence of high amounts of saturated fatty acids in beef tallow. .
Shannon (2009) in simple words said, higher the amount of saturated fatty acids
higher is the cloud point.
• Biodiesel usually has a high flash point (150°C or higher). According to Shannon (2009),
biodiesel with a carbon chain length of less than 12 is liable for a lower flashpoint as
compared to C16 and C18 chain length, which dominate in biodiesel.
• The alkyl esters of palmitic acid and stearic acid are the very first to solidify on the cooling of
biodiesel and therefore, typically clog biodiesel fuel filters. Dunn (2015) concluded that Palm
oil biodiesel having a large percentage of stearic and palmitic acids shows one of the highest
cold flow plugging point ( CFPP ) values whereas biodiesel obtained from peanut, containing
a large number of alkyl esters of long-chain saturated fatty acids, shows the worst CFPP.
• The viscosity of biodiesel is lower than that of the vegetable oils. From his research work,
Knothe (2015)concluded that viscosity increases with carbon atoms present in chain length
and the alcohol moiety. Viscosity also increases with the degree of saturation. A configuration
like cis double-bond gives a lower viscosity than the trans double bond. This is useful for
biodiesel synthesis from waste frying oil as typically this oil is, to some extent, hydrogenated
and contains a large quantity of trans fatty acid chains. Lee (1995) in his studies noted that
branching in the ester chain also affects viscosity, but to a smaller extent than unsaturation. .
Knothe (2005) studied the effect of presence of hydroxyl group in oil and concluded that the
presence of hydroxyl groups in the oil molecule (like in castor oil) also increase the viscosity.
Transesterification Method for Biodiesel
Production
In the first step of the transesterification reaction as studied by Fukuda (2001), triglycerides
are converted to diglycerides, followed by the subsequent reaction of diglycerides into
monoglycerides and then to glycerol, resulting in one alkyl ester molecule from each
glyceride at every step.
Methanol, as well as ethanol, are the most common and normally used alcohols. Ethanol
is preferred over methanol for biodiesel as it can be produced from agricultural feedstocks.
However, in practice usually methanol is used due to its low cost as well as its physical and
chemical advantages. From his work, Lee (1995) found that biodiesel from methanol has
slightly higher cloud and pour points and slightly lower viscosities compared to those
obtained from ethanol. Also, methanol does not form an azeotrope, and it is easily recycled,
but ethanol forms an azeotrope with water. The transesterification reaction can take place
with or without a catalyst. The catalyst used can be alkaline, acidic, or enzymatic. The
transesterification reaction can be homogeneously or heterogeneously catalyzed according
to the solubility of the catalyst in the reactant. Both acidic and alkaline catalysts can either
be homogeneous or heterogeneous depending upon their solubility in the reactants.
Reactions can take place either in a single step with acid or basic catalyst or in two steps
with both acidic and basic catalysts depending on the FFA content of the oil .
MATLAB INTERFACE
List of Biodiesel Feedstock supported in the program
The MATLAB program supports the following feedstocks and it appears as follow in the drop
down menu in the program.
Comparison in yield for
same feedstock and same
catalyst
Figure 4 shows the MATLAB interface in which feedstock selected is waste cooking oil, and
catalyst selected is NaOH (base catalysed). After result we get the condition required for
biodiesel production are catalyst amount:1%, molar ratio of alcohol to oil: 20%, reaction
temperature as 60 °C, reaction time as 90 min, and biodiesel yield as 95.8%.
Acid Catalyzed Transesterification
Figure 5 shows the MATLAB interface in which feedstock selected is karanja oil, and
catalyst selected is H2SO4 (acid catalysed). After result we get the condition required for
biodiesel production are catalyst amount:3%, molar ratio of alcohol to oil: 6:1, reaction
temperature as 60 °C, reaction time as 90 min, and biodiesel yield as 99.86%.
Enzymatic Catalyzed Transesterification
Figure 6 shows the MATLAB interface in which feedstock selected is waste cooking oil,
and catalyst selected is Novozym 435 (an enzymatic catalyst). After result we get the
condition required for biodiesel production are catalyst amount:15%, molar ratio of
alcohol to oil: 3.8:1, reaction temperature as 12 °C, reaction time as 2670min, and
biodiesel yield as 99%.
COMPARISON OF VARIOUS
TRANSESTERIFICATION PROCESSES
CONCLUSION
This program provides us all the necessary data essential for Biodiesel production, from
feedstock selection, choice of catalyst, to temperature, reaction time and yield of biodiesel owing to
variation in respect to parameters. It can be utilised in comparison of various parameters and yield of
biodiesel produced from same feedstock and same catalyst, and all this is compiled in an extremely
user friendly interface to ease the process. After exploring more than thirty five feedstocks and
variety of catalysts from acidic, basic, to enzymatic, we have prepared a conclusive list of most
productive biodiesel feedstock on the basis of yield from the available data in the program, and the
list is as follows:
FUTURE PERPECTIVES
This does have the potential to serve as a common global data base
and platform where all the information associated with biodiesel
production can be stored via online program (after Validation). In future
we can also include other methods like supercritical method, co solvent
method of biodiesel production. The figures related to economic analysis
of various feedstocks can be connected with data base of this program so
that we have economic criteria for selection of feedstock. Another
parameter i.e., Geographical information pertaining to different feedstock
can also be compiled, which as a result provides facts and details
depending upon our location to ease the process of biodiesel production.
References
• [1] Digambar Singh, Dilip Sharma, S.L. Soni, Sumit Sharma, Pushpendra Kumar Sharma,& Amit Jhalani (2019). A review on feedstocks,
production processes, and yield for different generations of biodiesel. Fuel 0016-2361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116553
• [2] M. Balat ,& Hariu Balat (2017) Progress in biodiesel processing. Applied Energy 87:1815–35.
• [3] Shahabaldin Rezania, Bahareh Oryani, Junboum Park, Beshare Hashemi, Krishna Kumar Yadav, Eilhann E. Kwon, Jin Hur,& Jinwoo Cho
(2019). Review on transesterification of non-edible sources for biodiesel production with a focus on economic aspects, fuel properties
and by-product applications. Energy Conversion and Management, 201 -112155. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112155
• [4] Oyetola Ogunkunle, Noor A. Ahmed (2019) A review of global current scenario of biodiesel adoption and combustion in vehicular
diesel engines,Energy Reports,Volume 5,Pages 1560-1579,
• ISSN 2352-4847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2019.10.028.
• [5] Moina Athar,& Sadaf Zaidi (2020). A review of the feedstocks, catalysts, and intensification techniques for sustainable biodiesel
production. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, S2213- 437(20)30872-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104523
• [6] Atabani AE, Silitonga AS, Ong HC, et al. (2013) Non-edible vegetable oils: A critical evaluation of oil extraction, fatty acid
compositions, biodiesel production, characteristics, engine performance and emissions production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy
Reviews 18: 211–245.
• [7] Doshi P and Srivastava G (2013) Sustainable approach to produce bioethanol from Karanja (Pongamia pinnata) oilseed residue.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 37(6): 781–788.
• [8] Panigrahi N, Mohanty MK, Mishra SR, et al. (2014) Performance, emission, energy, and exergy analysis of a C.I. engine using mahua
biodiesel blends with diesel. International Scholarly Research Notices 2014: 1–13.
[9] Deligiannis A, Anastopoulos G, Karavalakis G, et al. (2009) Castor (Ricinus Communis L) seed oil as an alternative feedstock for the
production of biodiesel. In: Proceeding of the 11th International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, Chania, Crete,
Greece, 3–5 September 2009, pp.204–211.
• [10] Heroor SH and Bharadwaj SDR (2013) Production of bio-fuel from crude neem oil and its performance. International Journal of
Environmental Engineering and Management 4: 425–432.
• [11] Kant P, Shuirong W, Chaliha S, et al. (2011) Going beyond Jatropha: Can an expanded land and feedstock base help India meet its
ambitious biodiesel target. Institute of Green Economy, IGREC working paper IGREC-22.
• [12] Moser BR (2011) Biodiesel production, properties, and feedstocks. In Vitro Cellular and Developmental Biology-Plant 45: 229–266.
• [13] Reksowardojo IK, Bui HN, Sok R, et al. (2011) The effect of biodiesel fuel from rubber seed oil (Hevea brasiliensis) seed oil on a direct
injection (DI) diesel engine. ASEAN Engineering Journal 1: 65–81.
• [14] Zdremnan M and Zdremnan D (2006) The tobacco oil and its qualities. Bulletin USAMV-CN 63: 209–213.
• [15] Liu Y, Xin Hl, & Yan YJ (2009). Physicochemical properties of stillingia oil: feasibility for biodiesel production by enzyme
transesterification. Industrial Crops and Products, 30(3):431–6.
• [16] A.E. Atabani, A.S.Silitonga, H.C.Ong, T.M.I.Mahlia, H.H.Masjuki, Irfan AnjumBadruddin, H.Fayaz (2013) Non-edible vegetable oils: A
critical evaluation of oil extraction, fatty acid compositions, biodiesel production, characteristics, engine performance and emissions
production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 18 (2013) 211–245
• [17] Masjuki HH. (2010) Biofuel engine: a new challenge. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Department of Mechanical Engineering University of
Malaya.
• [18] Pinzi S, Garcia IL, Gimenez FJL, Castro MDL, Dorado G, Dorado MP (2009) The ideal vegetable oil-based biodiesel composition: a
review of social, economical and technical implications. Energy & Fuels 23:2325–41.
• [19] Raj FRMS, Sahayaraj JW (2010) A comparative study over alternative fuel (biodiesel) for environmental friendly emission.
Chennai, India: Recent Advances in Space Technology Services and Climate Change (RSTSCC).
• [20]Ramos MJ, Ferna´ndez CM, Casas A, Rodrı´guez L, Pe´rez A´ (2009) Influenceoffatty acid composition of raw materials on biodiesel
properties. Bioresource Technology 100(1):261–8.
• [21] Ramadhas AS, Jayaraj S, Muraleedharan C (2005) . Biodiesel production from high FFA rubber seed oil. Fuel 84(4):335–40.
• [22] J. Van Gerpen, B. Shanks, R. Pruszko, D. Clements, G. Knothe (2004). Biodiesel production technology, Natl. Renew. Energy Lab.
NREL/SR-510-36244,United States N. P. doi: https://doi.org/10.2172/15008801.
• [23] A. Karmakar, S. Karmakar, & S. Mukherjee (2010) Properties of various plants and animals feedstocks for biodiesel production,
Bioresour. Technol. 101: 7201–7210. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.04.079.
• [24] M.J. Ramos, C.M. Fernández, A. Casas, L. Rodríguez, & Á. Pérez,(2008) Influence of fatty acid composition of raw materials on
biodiesel properties, Bioresour. Technol. 100 : 261–268. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.06.039.
• [25] G.R.M. Shannon D. Sanford, James Matthew White, Parag S. Shah, Claudia Wee, & Marlen A. Valverde (2009) Feedstock and
Biodiesel Characteristics Report, Renew. Energy Group, Inc.1–136. Doi: http://www.biodiesel.org/reports/20091117_gen-398.pdf.
• [26] R.O. Dunn (2015) Cold flow properties of biodiesel: A guide to getting an accurate analysis, Biofuels. 6: 115–128. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2015.1057791.
• [27] G. Knothe, J. Van Gerpen,& J. Krahl {2015) The Biodiesel Handbook, 1st ed., (AOCS Press)
• [28] I. Lee, L.A. Johnson,& E.G. Hammond(1995) Use of Branched-Chain Esters to Reduce the Crystallization Temperature of Biodiesei,
72:1155–1156.
• [29] G. Knothe,& K.R. Steidley (2005) Kinematic viscosity of biodiesel fuel components and related compounds. Influence of
compound structure and comparison to petrodiesel fuel components, Fuel 84:1059–1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2005.01.016.
• [30] H. Fukuda, A. Kondo,& H. Noda (2001) Biodiesel fuel production by transesterification of oils, J. Biosci. Bioeng. 92 : 405–
416.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-1723(01)80288-7.
• [31] I.A. Musa(2015) The effects of alcohol to oil molar ratios and the type of alcohol on biodiesel production using
transesterification process, Egypt. J. Pet. 25: 21–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2015.06.007.