ISO 14064 - Awareness Training - 20january2022
ISO 14064 - Awareness Training - 20january2022
Awareness
Training Session
Course objectives:
• To understand the requirements of ISO14064-1 and know how to prepare an
organisation inventory according to GHG Protocol for Corporate Accounting
IPCC was established in 1988 by the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO) and the
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), two organisations of the United Nations.
The Summary for Policymakers (SPM) is a summary of the IPCC reports intended to assist
policymakers. The content is determined by the scientists, but the form is approved line by
line by governments.
Shortwave Temperature
Radiation
Long-wave
Radiation
Climate Changes
Dec 1993 The 50th country approved UNFCCC and UNFCCC was executed in Mar 1994
”Berlin Mandate” established a process that would enable the Parties to
Mar 1995 take appropriate actions for the period beyond 2000 through the adoption
of a protocol or other legal instructions
“Declaration of Geneva “ stated legally binding objectives and significant
July 1996 reductions in GHG emissions
1998 to 2003 COP discussed flexible mechanism details, rules and procedures
Annex I countries (55 countries) approved Kyoto Protocol and the total GHG
Nov 2004 emissions of Annex 1 countries were more than 55%
Feb 2005 “Kyoto Protocol” was on the road
On the basis of equity and in accordance with their common but differentiated
responsibilities and respective capabilities.
Other GHG Programs might cover addtional GHGs, e.g. Fluorcarbons that are
covered by the Montreal Protocol
E.g. R22 (CFCs) is covered under Montreal Protocol but R23 (HFCs) is covered
under Kyoto Protocol
Joint Implementation, JI
Annex I countries invest in other Annex I countries’ reduction projects by
providing funding or technologies. Annex I countries can obtain Emission
Reductions Units (ERUs) to achieve reduction commitment
Similar to ISO14064-2
Emission Trading, ET
GHG credits can be traded in market, but only for Annex I countries
ISO 14064-2 – Specification with guidance at the project level for quantification,
monitoring and reporting of greenhouse gas emission reductions or removal
enhancements
ISO 14064-3 – Specification with guidance for the validation and verification of
greenhouse gas assertions
• ISO14064 is the basis from which a scheme can add or remove elements of
ISO14064
02/03/2022
considering its specific demands
Awareness Training on ISO 14064
Scope (1)
No matter the organisations are complex or simple, they shall comply with the
requirements of ISO14064-1 to design, develop, manage, and report their GHG
inventories
Process emissions: Ferrous metals, mineral oil refining, mineral industries (lime,
cement, ceramics, glass), pulp and paper
Report common sources such as electricity, gasoline (company vehicles), septic tank
(methane), refrigerant (air conditioning), combustion devices (natural gas)
02/03/2022 Awareness Training on ISO 14064
Relationship Between the Parts of ISO 14064
ISO 14064-1
ISO 14064-2
Design and develop
Design and implement
organisational GHG
GHG projects
inventories
Requirements of the
applicable GHG
GHG assertion Level of assurance GHG assertion program or
consistent with intended users
Verification needs of intend Validation and/or
users verification
ISO 14064-3
Verification process Validation and verification process
• Organisation (2.22)
• Company, corporation, firm, enterprise, authority or institution, or part or
combination thereof, whether incorporated or not, public or private, that has its
own functions and administration
• Client (2.25)
• Organisation or person requesting verification
• Materiality (2.28)
• Concept that individual or an aggregate of errors, omissions and
misrepresentations could affect the GHG assertion and could influence the
intended users’ decisions
• Uncertainty (2.37)
• Parameter associated with the result of quantification which characterizes
the dispersion of the values that could be reasonably attributed to the
quantified amount
02/03/2022 Awareness Training on ISO 14064
Terms and Definitions
• Greenhouse Gas Assertion (2.12)
• Declaration or factual and objective statement made by the responsible party
• Verification (2.35)
• Systematic, independent and documented process for the evaluation of a GHG
assertion against agreed verification criteria
• Verifier (2.36)
• Competent and independent person, or persons, with responsibility for
performing and reporting on the verification process
• Should (IAF)
• indicating recognised means of meeting the requirements of the standard.
• A validation or verification body (V/VB) can meet these in an equivalent way
provided this can be demonstrated to an Accreditation Body (AB)
Those clauses with “shall” in Part I and Part III must be fulfilled!
• Relevance (3.2)
• Completeness (3.3)
• Consistency (3.4)
• Accuracy (3.5)
• Transparency (3.6)
Equity of
GHG reduction Shareholder
$
• Select the GHG sources, GHG sinks, GHG reservoirs, data and methodologies
appropriate to the needs of the intended user (3.2)
• Protocol: All relevant emissions sources within the chosen inventory boundary need to
be accounted for so that a comprehensive and meaningful inventory is compiled
• Protocol: Verifiers can determine the potential impact and relevance of the exclusion, or
lack of quality, on the overall inventory report
• Protocol: Track and compare GHG emissions information over time in order to meet
the requirements of intended users
Verifiers shall judge if the accuracy of reported information meets the requirements
of intended users according to the reporting purposes
• Protocol: The information should be sufficient to enable a third party to derive the
same results if provided with the same source data
A “transparent” report can help intended users understand the GHG emissions and
GHG information management of an organisation
The verifier shall obtain transparent GHG information in order to establish appropriate
audit trails by which to verify and form his/her verification opinion
• The following figure illustrates the organisational boundaries and operational boundaries
for a sample company
Facility
GHG Emission Source
Organisation
GHG Emission Source
Facility
E.g.
The organisation accounts for its portion of GHG emissions and/or removals from
respective facilities
E.g. Company A owns 70% interest in company C, and company B owns 30%
interest in company C.
Company C emitted 1 million tonnes CO2e last year. Under equity share approach,
company A was assigned 700,000 tonnes CO2e and company B was assigned
300,000 tonnes CO2e
The organisation accounts for all quantified GHG emissions and/or removals from
facilities over which it has financial or operational control
E.g. Company A owns 70% interest in company C, and company B owns 30%
interest in company C. Company B has control over company C’s operational policy.
Company C emitted 1 million tonnes CO2e last year. Under control approach,
company A was assigned 0 tonnes CO2e and company B was assigned 1,000,000
tonnes CO2e
Under the control approach, an organisation accounts for 100% of the GHG
emissions/removals from operation over which it has control. Control may be
defined in either financial or operational terms (A.2)
• Having operational control does not mean that a company necessarily has authority
to make all decisions concerning an operation (Protocol)
• E.g. To invest big capital in an existing incineration plant will likely require the
approval of all partners that have joint financial control, but the partners may not
have operational control because it is the operator to introduce and implement
operational policies (investing big capital)
• The economic substance of the relationship between the company and the
operation takes precedence over the legal status (Protocol)
Control approach and equity share approach are to consolidate facility level GHG emissions to the
organisational level
Company X can choose to report on its 3 domestic facilities only (the organisational boundaries)
Company X shall choose either control or equity share approach to consolidate the GHG
emissions of the 3 facilities into the company
The emissions can not represent the company’s total emissions because only 3 of 5 facilities
included
The verifier shall clearly list the names of the facilities verified in the verification statement to
avoid any misinterpretation of the GHG emissions
• Direct emissions: GHG emissions from sources that companies own or control
(Protocol)
• Indirect emissions: GHG emissions that are a consequence of the activities of the
company but the GHG emission sources are owned or controlled by another
company (Protocol)
• Direct GHG emissions from electricity, heat and steam generated and exported or
distributed by the organisation may be reported separately, but shall not be
deducted from the organisation's total direct GHG emissions
• The organisation may quantify other indirect GHG emissions based on requirements
of the applicable GHG programme, internal reporting needs or the intended use for
the GHG inventory
• (Protocol) Companies shall separately account for and report on scopes 1 and 2 at a
minimum
Q: Company A imports electricity and exports all the imported electricity to company B.
Shall company A identify and quantify the electricity? What scope is the electricity
categorized?
• Stationary combustion
• Combustion of fuels in stationary equipment such as boilers, furnaces,
burners, turbines, heaters, incinerators, engines, flares, etc.
• Mobile combustion
• Combustion of fuels in transportation devices such as automobiles, trucks,
buses, trains, airplanes, boats, ships, barges, vessels, etc.
• GHG emissions are principally the result of the following types of activities undertaken
by the company (Protocol):
• Process emissions
• Emissions from physical or chemical processes such as CO2 from the calcination
step in cement manufacturing, CO2 from catalytic cracking in petrochemical
processing, PFC emissions from aluminum smelting, etc.
• Fugitive emissions
• Intentional and unintentional releases such as equipment leaks from joints,
seals, packing, gaskets, as well as fugitive emissions from coal piles, wastewater
treatment, pits, cooling towers, gas processing facilities, etc.
Q: Company A rents an apartment for its employees. Who shall account for the
emissions from the apartment under equity share approach and operational
control approach?
02/03/2022 Awareness Training on ISO 14064
GHG Protocol
ISO 14064-1
The organisation shall explain why certain GHG sources or sinks are excluded
from quantification
• The organisation shall, as appropriate, categorize identified GHG sources and sinks
Q: Can the RP apply “minimum emissions accounting threshold” to exclude from
identification of GHG sources and sinks?
• Facility-specific correlations
Use Plant A’s assumptions to calculate Plant B’s emissions assuming the two plants are
identical or similar
Comparisons of Accuracy
Measurement>Mass balance>Activity factor*Emission factor
Local emission factor> Domestic emission factor> International emission factor
• The organisation shall select or develop GHG emission and removal factors that:
• take account of quantification uncertainty and are calculated in a manner intended to yield accurate and
reproducible results
The uncertainty of national electricity emission factor is higher than that of local grid emission factor
Origin IPCC SAR (1996) IPCC TAR (2001) IPCC AR4 (2007)
CO2 1 1 1
CH4 21 23 25
N2 O 310 296 298
HFCs 140~11,700 120 ~ 12,000 140 ~ 14,800
Mobile combustion:
Check first the direct fuel consumptions, which is multiplied by GHG emission
factors
If no fuel consumption data is available, the mileage data should be converted into
fuel consumptions
E.g. 1020 km ÷ 10.2 km/L gas consumption rate (Mercedes Benz S320) = 100 liters
GHG emissions: 100L x 2.26 kg CO2 /L = 226 kg CO2 / y
Process emissions: the organisation may refer to recognized origin (e.g. IISI) or develop
its own GHG emission factors
02/03/2022 Awareness Training on ISO 14064
Selection or Development of GHG
Emission or Removal Factors (4.3.5)
Commonly used emissions factors (continued)
• The organisation may plan and implement directed actions to reduce or prevent GHG
emissions or increase GHG removals (5.2)
• The organisation should complete and document an uncertainty assessment for GHG
emissions and removals, including the uncertainty associated with emission and
removal factors (5.4)
• The organisation shall use tonnes as the unit of measure and shall convert the
quantity of each type of GHG to tonnes of CO2e using appropriate GWPs (5.1)
Preservation Emissions
Factors
EVIDENCE
Invoice
Daily Log
GWP
Flow meter
Calculations
System Boundary
02/03/2022 Awareness Training on ISO 14064
Example of GHG Information Management System – Process
Flow Diagram
Flow Diagram Executive Procedure Documents and Tables
GHG inventory
1. Establish committee •GHG inventory management procedure
implement meeting 2. High level managers sign the declaration •GHG inventory and voluntary reduction
3. Illustrate GHG inventory procedure statement
• If the organisation makes a public GHG assertion claiming conformance to ISO 14064-1,
the organisation shall make available to the public a GHG report prepared in
accordance with ISO 14064-1 OR an independent third-party verification statement
related to the GHG assertion
The organisation can present to the public a GHG report without a third-party
verification statement
The organisation should consider and document the following in planning its GHG
report: