0% found this document useful (0 votes)
46 views

Memory Management: Background Swapping Contiguous Allocation Paging Segmentation Segmentation With Paging

This document discusses several techniques for memory management including swapping, contiguous allocation, paging, segmentation, and segmentation with paging. It provides details on how each technique works such as how paging uses a page table to map logical to physical addresses and how swapping temporarily moves processes out of memory to disk. It also covers concepts like fragmentation, address translation, and memory protection.

Uploaded by

sumipriyaa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
46 views

Memory Management: Background Swapping Contiguous Allocation Paging Segmentation Segmentation With Paging

This document discusses several techniques for memory management including swapping, contiguous allocation, paging, segmentation, and segmentation with paging. It provides details on how each technique works such as how paging uses a page table to map logical to physical addresses and how swapping temporarily moves processes out of memory to disk. It also covers concepts like fragmentation, address translation, and memory protection.

Uploaded by

sumipriyaa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 55

Memory Management

 Background
 Swapping
 Contiguous Allocation
 Paging
 Segmentation
 Segmentation with Paging
Background

 Program must be brought into memory and placed


within a process for it to be run.

 Input queue – collection of processes on the disk that


are waiting to be brought into memory to run the
program.

 User programs go through several steps before being


run.
Binding of Instructions and Data to Memory

Address binding of instructions and data to memory addresses can


happen at three different stages.

 Compile time: If memory location known a priori,


absolute code can be generated; must recompile code if
starting location changes.
 Load time: Must generate relocatable code if memory
location is not known at compile time.
 Execution time: Binding delayed until run time if the
process can be moved during its execution from one
memory segment to another. Need hardware support
for address maps (e.g., base and limit registers).
Multistep Processing of a User Program

Operating System Concepts


Logical vs. Physical Address Space
 The concept of a logical address space that is bound to
a separate physical address space is central to proper
memory management.
◦ Logical address – generated by the CPU; also referred to as
virtual address.
◦ Physical address – address seen by the memory unit.

 Logical and physical addresses are the same in


compile-time and load-time address-binding schemes;
logical (virtual) and physical addresses differ in
execution-time address-binding scheme.
Memory-Management Unit (MMU)
 Hardware device that maps virtual to physical address.

 In MMU scheme, the value in the relocation register is


added to every address generated by a user process at
the time it is sent to memory.

 The user program deals with logical addresses; it never


sees the real physical addresses.
Dynamic relocation using a relocation register
Dynamic Loading
 Routine is not loaded until it is called
 Better memory-space utilization; unused routine is

never loaded.
 Useful when large amounts of code are needed to

handle infrequently occurring cases.


 No special support from the operating system is

required implemented through program design.


Dynamic Linking
 Linking postponed until execution time.
 Small piece of code, stub, used to locate the

appropriate memory-resident library routine.


 Stub replaces itself with the address of the routine, and

executes the routine.


 Operating system needed to check if routine is in

processes’ memory address.


 Dynamic linking is particularly useful for libraries.
Overlays
 Keep in memory only those instructions and data that
are needed at any given time.

 Needed when process is larger than amount of memory


allocated to it.

 Implemented by user, no special support needed from


operating system, programming design of overlay
structure is complex
Overlays for a Two-Pass Assembler
Swapping
 A process can be swapped temporarily out of memory to a backing store,
and then brought back into memory for continued execution.

 Backing store – fast disk large enough to accommodate copies of all


memory images for all users; must provide direct access to these memory
images.

 Roll out, roll in – swapping variant used for priority-based scheduling


algorithms; lower-priority process is swapped out so higher-priority
process can be loaded and executed.

 Major part of swap time is transfer time; total transfer time is directly
proportional to the amount of memory swapped.

 Modified versions of swapping are found on many systems, i.e., UNIX,


Linux, and Windows.
Schematic View of Swapping
Contiguous Allocation
 Main memory usually into two partitions:
◦ Resident operating system, usually held in low memory with
interrupt vector.
◦ User processes then held in high memory.

 Single-partition allocation
◦ Relocation-register scheme used to protect user processes from
each other, and from changing operating-system code and data.
◦ Relocation register contains value of smallest physical address;
limit register contains range of logical addresses – each logical
address must be less than the limit register.
Hardware Support for Relocation and Limit Registers
Contiguous Allocation (Cont.)
 Multiple-partition allocation
◦ Hole – block of available memory; holes of various size are
scattered throughout memory.
◦ When a process arrives, it is allocated memory from a hole
large enough to accommodate it.
◦ Operating system maintains information about:
a) allocated partitions b) free partitions (hole)

OS OS OS OS

process 5 process 5 process 5 process 5


process 9 process 9

process 8 process 10

process 2 process 2 process 2 process 2


Dynamic Storage-Allocation Problem
How to satisfy a request of size n from a list of free holes.

 First-fit: Allocate the first hole that is big enough.


 Best-fit: Allocate the smallest hole that is big enough;
must search entire list, unless ordered by size. Produces
the smallest leftover hole.
 Worst-fit: Allocate the largest hole; must also search
entire list. Produces the largest leftover hole.
 First-fit and best-fit better than worst-fit in terms of speed
and storage utilization.
Fragmentation
 Fragmentation occurs in a dynamic memory allocation system when many
of the free blocks are too small to satisfy any request.
 External Fragmentation – Fragmentation occurs in a dynamic memory
allocation system when many of the free blocks are too small to satisfy any
request. total memory space exists to satisfy a request, but it is not
contiguous.
 Internal Fragmentation – Internal fragmentation is the space wasted
inside of allocated memory blocks because of restriction on the allowed
sizes of allocated blocks. Allocated memory may be slightly larger than
requested memory; this size difference is memory internal to a partition,
but not being used.
 Reduce external fragmentation by compaction
◦ Shuffle memory contents to place all free memory together in one large block.
◦ Compaction is possible only if relocation is dynamic, and is done at execution time.
◦ I/O problem
 Latch job in memory while it is involved in I/O.
 Do I/O only into OS buffers.
Example of Internal & External
Fragmentation
Paging
 Logical address space of a process can be noncontiguous;
process is allocated physical memory whenever the latter is
available.
 Divide physical memory into fixed-sized blocks called frames
(size is power of 2, between 512 bytes and 8192 bytes).
 Divide logical memory into blocks of same size called pages.
 Keep track of all free frames.
 To run a program of size n pages, need to find n free frames
and load program.
 Set up a page table to translate logical to physical addresses.
 Internal fragmentation.
Address Translation Scheme
 Address generated by CPU is divided into:
◦ Page number (p) – used as an index into a page table which
contains base address of each page in physical memory.

◦ Page offset (d) – combined with base address to define the


physical memory address that is sent to the memory unit.
Address Translation Architecture
Paging Example
Paging Example
Free Frames

Before allocation After allocation


Implementation of Page Table
 Page table is kept in main memory.
 Page-table base register (PTBR) points to the page table.

 Page-table length register (PRLR) indicates size of the

page table.
 In this scheme every data/instruction access requires two

memory accesses. One for the page table and one for the
data/instruction.
 The two memory access problem can be solved by the use

of a special fast-lookup hardware cache called associative


memory or translation look-aside buffers (TLBs)
Associative Memory
 Associative memory – parallel search
Page # Frame #

Address translation (A´, A´´)


◦ If A´ is in associative register, get frame # out.
◦ Otherwise get frame # from page table in memory

Operating System Concepts


Paging Hardware With TLB
Effective Access Time
 Associative Lookup =  time unit
 Assume memory cycle time is 1 microsecond
 Hit ratio – percentage of times that a page number is
found in the associative registers; ration related to
number of associative registers.
 Hit ratio = 
 Effective Access Time (EAT)
EAT = (1 + )  + (2 + )(1 – )
=2+–
Memory Protection
 Memory protection implemented by associating
protection bit with each frame.

 Valid-invalid bit attached to each entry in the page


table:
◦ “valid” indicates that the associated page is in the process’
logical address space, and is thus a legal page.
◦ “invalid” indicates that the page is not in the process’ logical
address space.
Valid (v) or Invalid (i) Bit In A Page Table
Page Table Structure
 Hierarchical Paging

 Hashed Page Tables

 Inverted Page Tables


Hierarchical Page Tables
 Break up the logical address space into multiple page
tables.

 A simple technique is a two-level page table.


Two-Level Paging Example
 A logical address (on 32-bit machine with 4K page size) is divided
into:
◦ a page number consisting of 20 bits.
◦ a page offset consisting of 12 bits.
 Since the page table is paged, the page number is further divided into:
◦ a 10-bit page number.
◦ a 10-bit page offset.
 Thus, a logical address is as follows:
page number page offset
pi p2 d

10 10 12

where pi is an index into the outer page table, and p2 is the


displacement within the page of the outer page table.
Two-Level Page-Table Scheme
Address-Translation Scheme
 Address-translation scheme for a two-level 32-bit
paging architecture
Hashed Page Tables
 Common in address spaces > 32 bits.

 Each element consists of three fields: (a) the virtual page number,
(b) the value of he mapped page frame, and (c) a pointer to the next
element in the linked list.

 The virtual page number in the virtual address is hashed into the
hash table. The virtual page number is compared to field (a) in the
first element in the linked list. If there is a match, the corresponding
page frame (field (b)) is used to form the desired physical address.

 If there is no match, subsequent entries in the linked list are


searched for a matching virtual page number.
Hashed Page Table
Inverted Page Table
 One entry for each real page of memory.
 Entry consists of the virtual address of the page stored

in that real memory location, with information about


the process that owns that page.
 Decreases memory needed to store each page table, but

increases time needed to search the table when a page


reference occurs.
 Use hash table to limit the search to one — or at most a

few — page-table entries.


Inverted Page Table Architecture
Shared Pages
 Shared code
◦ One copy of read-only (reentrant) code shared among
processes (i.e., text editors, compilers, window systems).
◦ Shared code must appear in same location in the logical
address space of all processes.

 Private code and data


◦ Each process keeps a separate copy of the code and data.
◦ The pages for the private code and data can appear anywhere
in the logical address space.
Shared Pages Example
Segmentation
 Memory-management scheme that supports user view of memory.
 A program is a collection of segments. A segment is a logical unit such as:
main program,
procedure,
function,
method,
object,
local variables, global variables,
common block,
stack,
symbol table, arrays
User’s View of a Program
Logical View of Segmentation
1

4
1

3 2
4

user space physical memory space


Segmentation Architecture
 Logical address consists of a two tuple:
<segment-number, offset>,
 Segment table – maps two-dimensional physical addresses; each

table entry has:


◦ base – contains the starting physical address where the segments reside
in memory.
◦ limit – specifies the length of the segment.
 Segment-table base register (STBR) points to the segment
table’s location in memory.
 Segment-table length register (STLR) indicates number of

segments used by a program;


segment number s is legal if s < STLR.
Segmentation Architecture (Cont.)
 Relocation.
◦ dynamic
◦ by segment table

 Sharing.
◦ shared segments
◦ same segment number

 Allocation.
◦ first fit/best fit
◦ external fragmentation
Segmentation Architecture (Cont.)
 Protection. With each entry in segment table associate:
◦ validation bit = 0  illegal segment
◦ read/write/execute privileges
 Protection bits associated with segments; code sharing
occurs at segment level.
 Since segments vary in length, memory allocation is a

dynamic storage-allocation problem.


 A segmentation example is shown in the following

diagram
Segmentation Hardware
Example of Segmentation
Sharing of Segments
Segmentation with Paging – MULTICS
 The MULTICS system solved problems of external
fragmentation and lengthy search times by paging the
segments.

 Solution differs from pure segmentation in that the


segment-table entry contains not the base address of the
segment, but rather the base address of a page table for
this segment.
MULTICS Address Translation Scheme
Segmentation with Paging – Intel 386

 As shown in the following diagram, the Intel


386 uses segmentation with paging for memory
management with a two-level paging scheme.
Intel 30386 Address Translation

You might also like