1 Lecture Int
1 Lecture Int
Baimuratov O.A.
[email protected]
Links & books
• Dr. Ahme-Refat AG Refat Methods Basic Concepts & Methods SBCM#19
2013
• Research Methods KINE 5300
• Thomas Songer, PhD, Introduction to Research, Scientific Method Identifying
Hypotheses
• Annie Gabriel Library, Basic Research Methods
• Dr James Betts FACSM, Introduction to Study Skills & Research Methods
• Dr. Prabhat Pandey , Dr. Meenu Mishra Pandey RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY: TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES
•
Definitions of Research
• The main goal of research is the gathering and
interpreting of information to answer questions
(Hyllegard, Mood, and Morrow, 1996).
• Research is a systematic attempt to provide answers to
questions (Tuckman, 1999).
• Research may be defined as the systematic and
objective analysis and recording of controlled
observations that may lead to the development of
generalizations, principles, or theories, resulting in
prediction and possible control of events (Best and
Kahn, 1998).
• Research is a systematic way of asking questions, a
systematic method of inquiry (Drew, Hardman, and Hart,
1996).
Development of Research Skills
• Learning how to conduct good research:
– New skills (that many people do not have)
– Better understanding and interpretation of the
literature
– Recognize new questions that need
investigation
• Objectivity is the key element of research
The Scientific Method
• Systematic; cyclic; series of logical steps.
– Identifying the problem
– Formulating a hypothesis
– Developing the research plan
– Collecting and analyzing the data
– Interpreting results and forming conclusions
Identifying the Problem
• First, and arguably the most important,
step
– Several sources
• Theoretical basis
• Professional practice
• Personal experience
• Shear curiosity
– Starts as a broad question that must be
narrowed
– Problem statement; experimental approach to
the problem; etc.
Identifying the Problem
• Three categories when selecting a
research problem
– Those who know precisely what they want to
do and have a well conceived problem
– Those who have many interest areas and
are having difficulty deciding exactly what
they want to study
– Those who do not have any idea about a
worthwhile research problem
Formulating a Hypothesis
• Hypothesis:
– A belief or prediction of the eventual outcome of
the research
– A concrete, specific statement about the
relationships between phenomena
– Based on deductive reasoning
– 2 types of hypotheses:
• Null hypothesis (HO)
– All is equal; no differences exist
• Alternative (research) hypothesis (HA)
– Usually specific and opposite to the null
Developing the Research Plan
• A strategy must be developed for
gathering and analyzing the information
that is required to test the hypotheses or
answer the research question
– Four parts:
• Selection of a relevant research methodology
• Identification of subjects or participants
• Description of the data-gathering procedures
• Specification of the data analysis techniques
– Pilot studies, IRB,…all must be determined in
advance!
Collecting and Analyzing the Data
• Following all the pre-determined protocols
– Time in the lab collecting data
– Analyzing the composite data
– Controlling the environment
• Easiest part of the process…
– However, sometime the most time-consuming
part of the process…
Interpreting Results and Forming
Conclusions
• DATA ANALYSIS IS NOT AN END IN
ITSELF!
• Does the evidence support or refute the
original hypotheses?
– Accept or reject the hypotheses
– Conclusions should be drawn:
• Develop new hypotheses to explain the results
• Inferences are typically made beyond the specific
study
New Questions Arise
Question Identified
Larouche R.
Many adolescents in the United States engage in behaviors that increase their risk for human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). Because 95% of all
youth aged 5-17 years are enrolled in school, school health programs can be an efficient method to help
prevent these behaviors. Previous studies have examined selected characteristics of HIV education in the
United States; however, none provide a comprehensive assessment of HIV education policies and programs
nationwide. In 1994, CDC conducted the School Health Policies and Programs Study (SHPPS), which
assessed five components of the school health program: health education, physical education, health services,
food service, and health policies. To provide a comprehensive assessment of HIV-prevention education
programs nationwide in 1994, CDC analyzed data from the health education component of the study. This
report summarizes the findings, which indicate that although HIV-prevention education has been widely
implemented in U.S. schools, improvement in these programs is needed.
Difference Questions
• Purpose:
– To make comparisons between or within
groups.
– Is there a difference?
• Experimental research
– Treatment vs. control
– Pre- vs. post-test comparisons
• Nonexperimental research
– Compare one group to another based on existing
characteristics
J Appl Physiol. 2000 Sep;89(3):1179-88.
Reduced strength after passive stretch of the human plantarflexors.
The purpose of this study was to assess strength performance after an acute bout of maximally
tolerable passive stretch (PS(max)) in human subjects. Ten young adults (6 men and 4 women)
underwent 30 min of cyclical PS(max) (13 stretches of 135 s each over 33 min) and a similar control
period (Con) of no stretch of the ankle plantarflexors. Measures of isometric strength (maximal
voluntary contraction), with twitch interpolation and electromyography, and twitch characteristics
were assessed before (Pre), immediately after (Post), and at 5, 15, 30, 45, and 60 min after
PS(max) or Con. Compared with Pre, maximal voluntary contraction was decreased at Post (28%)
and at 5 (21%), 15 (13%), 30 (12%), 45 (10%), and 60 (9%) min after PS(max) (P < 0.05). Motor
unit activation and electromyogram were significantly depressed after PS(max) but had recovered
by 15 min. An additional testing trial confirmed that the torque-joint angle relation may have been
temporarily altered, but at Post only. These data indicate that prolonged stretching of a single
muscle decreases voluntary strength for up to 1 h after the stretch as a result of impaired activation
and contractile force in the early phase of deficit and by impaired contractile force throughout the
entire period of deficit.
Relationship Questions
• Purpose
– To investigate the degree to which two or
more variables covary or are associated with
each other
• Rather than analyzing the differences between
groups, researchers characterize the relationships
among them.
• Extent to which variables are related
• Not to establish cause-and-effect
Am J Epidemiol. 1988 May;127(5):933-41. Related Articles, Links
The associations of physical activity and cardiovascular fitness with cardiovascular disease risk factors were
studied in 88 male adults, 180 female adults, 148 male children, and 142 female children. Subjects were
families recruited from elementary schools in San Diego, California. Fitness (VO2 max) was measured by a
submaximal cycle ergometer test. Physical activity was assessed by seven-day recall interview, yielding
caloric expenditure, and by a simple self-rating of activity level. Risk factors included blood pressure, high
density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, the ratio of high density lipoproteins to low density lipoproteins (LDL),
and body mass index. For all subgroups, fitness was strongly and significantly correlated with virtually all risk
factors. After adjustment for body mass index, most fitness-risk factor associations were no longer significant.
Seven-day caloric expenditure was significantly correlated with HDL/LDL only in female adults and children.
The activity rating was significantly correlated with body mass index in all subgroups and with HDL/LDL in
female adults and male adults. The simple activity rating tended to be correlated with fitness. The pattern of
association was similar for adults and children.
Theory vs. Hypothesis
• Hypothesis
– A belief or prediction of the eventual outcome of the
research
– A concrete, specific statement about the relationships
between phenomena
– Based on deductive reasoning
• Theory
– A belief or assumption about how things relate to
each other
– A theory establishes a cause-and-effect relationship
between variables with a purpose of explaining and
predicting phenomena
– Based on inductive reasoning
Hypotheses
In an ideal
world…
Theories
Laws
Empiricism
• Acquiring information and facts through
the observation of our world
– Pragmatic observations
– Developing theory through experience and
observation
– Non-scientific
– Quick and practical solution to a problem
• With little interest in explaining when, how, or why
– Example: Anabolic steroid use (abuse)…
Research Classifications
• System #1:
– Basic research
– Applied research
• System #2:
– Quantitative research
– Qualitative research
• System #3:
– Experimental research
– Nonexperimental research
Basic vs. Applied Research
• Basic • Applied
– Pure, fundamental – Central purpose to
research solve an immediate
problem
– Discovery of new
– Improved products or
knowledge; theoretical processes
in nature
– Infers beyond the
– Takes many years for group or situation
the results of basic studied
research to find some – Interpretation of
practical utility results relies upon
Basic research
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2003 Mar;43(1):21-7. Related Articles, Links
Effects of running, static stretching and practice jumps on explosive force production
and jumping performance.
Young WB, Behm DG.
School of Human Movement and Sport Sciences, University of Ballarat, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia. [email protected]
AIM: The interaction between running, stretching and practice jumps during warm-up for jumping tests has
not been investigated. The purpose of the present study was to compare the effects of running, static
stretching of the leg extensors and practice jumps on explosive force production and jumping performance.
METHODS: Sixteen volunteers (13 male and 3 female) participated in five different warm-ups in a
randomised order prior to the performance of two jumping tests. The warm-ups were control, 4 min run, static
stretch, run + stretch, and run + stretch + practice jumps. After a 2 min rest, a concentric jump and a drop
jump were performed, which yielded 6 variables expressing fast force production and jumping performance of
the leg extensor muscles (concentric jump height, peak force, rate of force developed, drop jump height,
contact time and height/time). RESULTS: Generally the stretching warm-up produced the lowest values and
the run or run + stretch + jumps warm-ups produced the highest values of explosive force production. There
were no significant differences (p<0.05) between the control and run + stretch warm-ups, whereas the run
yielded significantly better scores than the run + stretch warm-up for drop jump height (3.2%), concentric
jump height (3.4%) and peak concentric force (2.7%) and rate of force developed (15.4%). CONCLUSION:
The results indicated that submaximum running and practice jumps had a positive effect whereas static
stretching had a negative influence on explosive force and jumping performance. It was suggested that an
alternative for static stretching should be considered in warm-ups prior to power activities.
J Strength Cond Res. 2002 Aug;16(3):399-408.
The purpose of this study was to examine the responses of peak torque (PT), mean power output (MP),
mechanomyographic (MMG) and electromyographic (EMG) amplitudes, and mean power frequencies
(MPFs) of the vastus lateralis (VL), rectus femoris (RF), and vastus medialis (VM) in men and women
during dynamic muscle actions. Twelve women (mean +/- SD age = 22 +/- 3 years) and 11 men (22 +/- 3
years) performed maximal, concentric, isokinetic leg extensions at velocities of 60, 120, 180, 240, and 300
degrees x s(-1) on a Cybex 6000 dynamometer. Piezoelectric MMG-recording sensors and bipolar surface
EMG electrodes were placed over the VL, RF, and VM muscles. No sex-related differences were found
among the velocity-related patterns for PT, MP, MMG amplitude, MMG MPF, or EMG MPF. There were,
however, sex-related differences in the patterns of EMG amplitude across velocity. The results indicated
similar velocity-related patterns of increase of MP and MMG amplitude for all 3 muscles and of EMG
amplitude for the VL and VM in the women. Velocity-related decreases (p <or = 0.05) were found for PT
and EMG MPF for the VL. EMG amplitude for all muscles in the men and for the RF in the women as well
as EMG MPF for the RF and VM remained unchanged (p > 0.05) across velocity. MMG MPF increased (p <
or = 0.05) only between 240 and 300 degrees x s(-1). Overall, these findings suggested that there were
sex- and muscle-specific, velocity-related differences in the associations among motor unit activation
strategies (EMG amplitude and MPF) and the mechanical aspects of muscular activity (MMG amplitude and
MPF). With additional examination and validation, however, MMG may prove useful to practitioners for
monitoring training-induced changes in muscle power output.
Quantitative vs. Qualitative
• Quantitative • Qualitative
– Numerical, measurable – Generally non-numerical
data data
– Traditional or positivist
– Typically anthropological
approach
and sociological research
• Clearly stated questions
methods
• Rational hypotheses
• Developed research – Observations of a “natural”
procedures setting
• Extraneous variable – In-depth descriptions of
controls situations
• Large samples
– Interpretive and descriptive
• Traditional, statistical
analyses
Experimental vs.
Nonexperimental
• Experimental • Nonexperimental
– IVs and DVs 1. Causal-comparative
– Cause-and-effect 2. Descriptive
– Extraneous variable
3. Correlational
controls
– 3 fundamental 4. Historical
characteristics
1. At least 1 active IV
2. Extraneous var
controls
3. Observation of the DV
response to the IV
Steps to Experimental Research
1. Identifying the research question or problem
area
2. Initial review of literature
3. Distilling the question to a specific research
problem
4. Continued review of literature
5. Formulation of hypotheses
6. Determining the basic research approach
7. Identifying the population and sample
Steps to Experimental Research
8. Designing data collection plan
9. Selecting or developing specific data collection
instruments or procedures
10. Choosing the method of data analysis
11. Implementing the research plan
12. Preparing the research report
Questions
1. Write two new conclusion statements by using
deductive and inductive reasoning.
2. Identify the research problem.
3. Identify the research plan.
4. How did they collect the data?
– What equipment/methods/procedures did they use?
5. How did they analyze the data?
6. Did they support or reject the original research
hypothesis? Why?
Questions
7. What were the conclusions? Future
studies?
8. Identify the purpose statement.
9. Identify the hypotheses.
Additional Questions
1. Re-write the title using 5 – 8 words.
2. Re-write the title using 15 – 18 words.
3. Provide the delimitations for this study.
4. What are 2 examples of the limitations of
this study?
5. Does this study answer the questions of
the “Methods” section checklist?
Assignment 1
• PART 1
• Sign up for the following two discussion groups:
– BIOMCH-L
• [email protected]
• For information and archives:
– http://isb.ri.ccf.org/biomch-l
– Sportscience
• Post messages to [email protected]
• To subscribe, send any message to
– [email protected]
• To unsubscribe, send any message to
– [email protected]
• View all messages at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sportscience/
Assignment 1
• PART 2
• Bring copies (for everyone, 7 total) of a full-text article published
recently on a topic of your interest that is related to Kinesiology,
Exercise Science, Athletic Training, etc.
• Provide a written summary (1-2 pages, double spaced, times
roman font) of your answers and answer the following questions.
• You’ll be asked to give a brief oral presentation (5 – 7 min)
regarding your article and your answers to the following questions:
1. What is the research problem?
2. What is the purpose statement?
3. What were the delimitations of this study?
4. What were some potential limitations of this study?
5. What were the initial hypotheses for this study?
6. Where the hypotheses rejected or accepted?
7. What was the overall conclusion of this paper?
8. If you were to replicate this study, describe how you would do it at
UTA.