0% found this document useful (0 votes)
134 views8 pages

CH - 13 - Pooling Cross Sections Across Time Simple Panel Data Methods

Uploaded by

Hiếu Dương
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
134 views8 pages

CH - 13 - Pooling Cross Sections Across Time Simple Panel Data Methods

Uploaded by

Hiếu Dương
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

Pooling Cross

Sections across
Chapter 13
Time: Simple Panel
Data Methods

© 2016 Cengage Learning ®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or
service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use. © kentoh/Shutterstock.
Pooling Cross Sections across Time:
Simple Panel Data Methods

● Policy analysis with pooled cross sections


• Two or more independently sampled cross sections can be used to
evaluate the impact of a certain event or policy change

● Example: Effect of new garbage incinerator’s location on


housing prices
• Examine the effect of the location of a house on its price before and
after the garbage incinerator was built: After incinerator
was built

Before incinerator
was built

© 2016 Cengage Learning ®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a
certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
Pooling Cross Sections across Time:
Simple Panel Data Methods

● Example: Garbage incinerator and housing prices (cont.)


• It would be wrong to conclude from the regression after the
incinerator is there that being near the incinerator depresses prices
so strongly
• One has to compare with the situation before the incinerator was
built:

Incinerator depresses prices but location


was one with lower prices anyway
• In the given case, this is equivalent to

● This is the so called difference-in-differences estimator (DiD)


© 2016 Cengage Learning ®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a
certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
Pooling Cross Sections across Time:
Simple Panel Data Methods

● Difference-in-differences in a regression framework

Differential effect of being in the location and after the incinerator was built

• In this way standard errors for the DiD-effect can be obtained


• If houses sold before and after the incinerator was built were sys-
tematically different, further explanatory variables should be
included
• This will also reduce the error variance and thus standard errors

● Before/After comparisons in “natural experiments”


• DiD can be used to evaluate policy changes or other exogenous
events
© 2016 Cengage Learning ®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a
certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
Pooling Cross Sections across Time:
Simple Panel Data Methods

● Policy evaluation using difference-in-differences

Compare outcomes of the two groups


before and after the policy change

Compare the difference in outcomes of the units that are affected by the policy change (= treatment
group) and those who are not affected (= control group) before and after the policy was enacted.

For example, the level of unemployment benefits is cut but only for group A (= treatment group).
Group A normally has longer unemployment durations than group B (= control group). If the diffe-
rence in unemployment durations between group A and group B becomes smaller after the reform,
reducing unemployment benefits reduces unemployment duration for those affected.

Caution: Difference-in-differences only works if the difference in outcomes between the two groups
is not changed by other factors than the policy change (e.g. there must be no differential trends).

© 2016 Cengage Learning ®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a
certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
Pooling Cross Sections across Time:
Simple Panel Data Methods

● Two-period panel data analysis

● Example: Effect of unemployment on city crime rate


• Assume that no other explanatory variables are available. Will it be
possible to estimate the causal effect of unemployment on crime?
• Yes, if cities are observed for at least two periods and other factors
affecting crime stay approximately constant over those periods:

Time dummy for Unobserved time-constant Other unobserved factors


the second period factors (= fixed effect) (= idiosyncratic error)

© 2016 Cengage Learning ®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a
certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
Pooling Cross Sections across Time:
Simple Panel Data Methods

● Example: Effect of unemployment on city crime rate (cont.)

Subtract:

Fixed effect drops out


● Estimate differenced equation by OLS:

+ 1 percentage point unemploy-


ment rate leads to 2.22 more
crimes per 1,000 people

Secular increase in crime

© 2016 Cengage Learning ®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a
certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.
Pooling Cross Sections across Time:
Simple Panel Data Methods

● Discussion of first-differenced panel estimator


• Further explanatory variables may be included in original equation
• Note that there may be arbitrary correlation between the unobserved
time-invariant characteristics and the included explanatory variables
• OLS in the original equation would therefore be inconsistent
• The first-differenced panel estimator is thus a way to consistently
estimate causal effects in the presence of time-invariant endogeneity
• For consistency, strict exogeneity has to hold in the original equation
• First-differenced estimates will be imprecise if explanatory variables
vary only little over time (no estimate possible if time-invariant)

© 2016 Cengage Learning ®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a
certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.

You might also like