AN EXPERT LECTURE ON

ATTRIBUTE DATA MANAGMENT IN GIS

ENVIRONMENT
AT
WORKSHOP ON
”GIS TRAINING ”

BY
Dr. L. B. ZALA

PROFESSOR & HEAD,

DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
B V M ENGINEERING COLLEGE
 ORGANISATION OF PRESENTATION

INTRODUCTION

DEVELOPMENT OF GIS DATABASE FOR STUDY AREA

STUDY AREA PROFILE

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

ORIGIN –DESTINATION MATRIX DEVELOPMENT

TRAVEL DEMAND MODELLING AND FORECASTING

TRANSPORTATION NETWORK MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS

SAFETY EVALUATION ON SELECTED CORRIDORS OF STUDY AREA

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

ANNEXURES
REFERENCES
 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES

 Creation of GIS Database for the Regional Transportation

Analysis Zone (TAZs) and Road Network

 To develop methodology for estimation of trip rates

(trips/HH and trips/ person) and total trips for the study
region based on socio-economic parameters

 Development of GIS based procedures for preparing,

planning and monitoring strategy for regional road users’
movement

 Transportation Demand Estimation and Capacity

Evaluation of existing network

 Accident Analysis in the study region using the GIS

database developed
 FLOW DIAGRAM OF STUDY METHODOLOGY
Probl Review of current regional Review of GIS Review of road safety studies
em transportation studies\plans
Identif
icatio
n

Integration of data on road users’ State of the art and present studies
Identify strength and weakness movement and safety

Define research scope

Frame
work
formu Identify appropriate hardware and software
lation

Establish procedure for road Obtain hard copy map /satellite image of Obtain accident and speed data
users demand forecast study area Of study area
(Trips rate)

Complete Establish\formulate Safe and efficient regional road users’ movement frame work
d frame
work
and
report

Apply case study for model validation

Conclusions and Recommendations

LOCATION MAP OF ANAND DISTRICT
• GIS-T: ENHANCED GIS AND TIS

GIS TIS

GIS-T

TransCAD
 CONCEPTUAL MODEL FOR STRUCTURED SPATIAL
DATABASE CREATION
SECONDARY
DATA Spatial data Regional/
module Combined
District 1 spatial data
Topo-sheets Taluka 1,
Taluka 2,
…………
Taluka n
Region1
PWD Road Database
Maps
Processing District 2
Data Taluka 1, State Level
for software Taluka 2,
and computer Data base
………… Region2
Thematic maps compatible Taluka n Database
Format

District i
Satellite …….. Region i
imageries Database

District n
Taluka 1,
PRIMARY DATA Taluka 2,
…………. Region n
GPS Data/ Taluka n Database

Survey Data
CONCEPTUAL MODEL FOR ATTRIBUTE DATABASE FOR A REGION

DATA TYPES LEVEL DATA GROUP DISTRICT LEVEL

MODEL

POPULATION TALUKA,VILLAGE,
POPULATION OF
DATA URBAN CENTRES
TALUKA, VILLAGE
DISTRICT1

TALUKA1
SOCIO- TALUKA2
ECONOMIC TALUKA, LAND USE, ….
DISTRICT INFRASTRUCTURES ….. REGIONAL
DATA
….. DATABASE
TALUKA n MODULE

ROAD ROAD GEOMETRICS,

TALUKA, DISTRICT PAVEMENT TYPES,
NETWORK
TRAFFIC
DISTRICT n

TALUKA n
BUS TRANSIT BUS ROUTES, BUS
ROUTES DEPOT, DIVISION
STOPS
MAP OF POPULATION AND DECADAL GROWTH RATES
POPULATION DENSITY IN VARIOUS TALUKAS OF
ANAND DISTRICT
PROPORTION OF VARIOUS CATEGORIES OF ROADS IN
GUJARAT STATE, 2005-06

EXP, 91.73, (0.12%)

NH, 2439, (3.29%)
VR , 21098,
(28.45%) SH, 19163, (25.84%)

ODR, 10422,
MDR, 20953,
(14.05%)
(28.25%)

PROPORTION OF VARIOUS CATEGORIES OF ROADS IN GUJARAT

 PROPORTION OF ROADS IN THE STUDY AREA (2005-06)

NH; 26.00; 1.81% EX; 26.00; 1.81%

VR; 529.09; 36.83%
SH; 497.00; 34.60%

ODR; 123.20; 8.58%

MDR; 235.30;
16.38%
PROPORATION OF DIFFERENT CATEGORIES OF ROAD IN ANAND
COMPOSITION OF REGISTERED VEHICLES IN
GUJARAT STATE
Private Service
Goodas Vehicles
Vehicles Tractors
0.06% 5.49%
3.96%
School Buses Ambulances
Trailors
0.01% 0.05%
2.89%

Passenger buses Others

0.64% 0.20%
Taxi cabs
0.52%

Motor cars
8.08%
Jeep
1.59% Auto rickshaw
3.94% Two wheelers
72.57%
VEHICLE COMPOSITION OF REGISTERED VEHICLES IN GUJARAT STATE 2003
COMPOSITION OF REGISTERED VEHICLES IN ANAND
DISTRICT

Others, 3658, Bus, 21, 0.08%Taxi & Jeep, 452,

14.66% 1.81%
Truck& LMV, 4121,
16.52%

Cars, 5263, 21.10%

Autorickshaws,
Two-wheelers, 2469, 9.90%
8962, 35.93%
COMPOSITION OF REGISTERED VEHICLES IN ANAND DISTRICT
IMPORTANT PARAMETERS: FLEET SIZE AND LOCATIONS OF BUS
DEPOTS AND STATIONS
DISTRICT LEVEL ELECTORAL ZONES IN THE STUDY AREA
ATTRIBUTE DATABASE FOR EL – TAZ IN ANAND DISTRICT
TRAVEL DEMAND MODELLING AND FORECASTING FOR STUDY AREA

REGIONAL TRIP GENERATION

ACTIVITY

TRIP DISTRIBUTION
HIGHWAY
NETWORK-
EFFICIENT
OPERATION

MODAL SPLIT

TRIP ASSIGNMENT

TRAFFIC FLOW
IMPROVE
NETWORK
CAPACITY

(TRAFFIC FLOW /
CAPACITY)
< = 0.5 FOR
YES LOS B NO
 DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

THE FORMATION OF EFFECTIVE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING REQUIRES

A GOOD DATABASE

DATA IS NECESSARY FOR CALIBRATION AND APPLICATION OF FORECASTING

MODELS AND GAUGING THE DEGREE TO WHICH PLANNING GOALS AND
OBJECTIVES ARE ACHIEVED

THE PARAMETERS IN THE ANALYSIS OF TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

(I)DEMAND RELATED PARAMETERS
(II)SUPPLY RELATED PARAMETERS

ACCORDING TO (STOPHER 2000) DATA NEED FOR THREE MAIN PURPOSES:

DESCRIPTION OF PRESENT SITUATION
INPUT TO DEVELOPMENT AND USE OF TRANSPORT MODELS
MONITORING THE EFFECT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF POLICIES,
STRATEGIES AND INVESTMENTS
DATA REQUIREMENT FOR PRESENT STUDYAND METHODOLOGY
Problem Identification

Data Requirements

Data

Zonal Level HH Level Link Level O-D Data Occupancy

Data Person Trip O-
Area Data Data Data
Population Size Volume D For
Literacy Income Vehicle Trip O- Two-wheelers
Speed
….. Trips D Cars
Link length
Vehicle Capacity Bus
ownership Truck
License holders

HH Surveys
Spot-speed RSI Survey in
Secondary Census Data Questionnaire
Study designed
Surveys HH Surveys Design
CVC Format
Old Reports

Training to Interviewers, Data Coding and Formatting

Database

No

Is database Repeat Data

complete? Needs Survey
Yes

Analysis and Presentation of Data

 Transportation Surveys for Planning

Participatory Non-Participatory
Active role in the provision of data By Observing subject (Classified
to the survey by answering a Volume Count (CVC), Spot-Speed)
survey questionnaire (survey by
mail)

Traffic Network Spot Speed Road Side

House hold survey Counting Inventory Survey Interview

Automated Human Video Satellite

Retrospective Prospective Surveys Traffic Surveyors Cameras Imagery
Surveys To record activities of Counters
Previous day a day or days in future
activity record

Voice On Paper Hand held Radar Manual

Recorder Record Speedet Counters

Face to face Telephone Computer Postal Combination Commercial Work place Intercept
interview interview Aided Personal survey of these
Interview Vehicle Surveys Surveys Surveys
surveys

On-board Transit At Terminal

Survey Bus Passenger Interview
(BPI)
 HOUSEHOLD INTERVIEW SURVEY

SAMPLE SIZES RECOMMENDED IN TRADITIONAL SURVEYS

Population of area Sample size ( Dwelling Units)

Recommended Minimum

Under 50000 1 in 5 1 in 10

50000-150000 1 in 8 1 in 20

150000-300000 1 in 10 1 in 35

300000-500000 1 in 15 1 in 50

500000-1000000 1 in 20 1 in 70

Over 1000000 1 in 25 1 in 100

Source: Ortuzar and Willumsen, 1996, Kadiyali, 1998

 HOUSEHOLD SURVEY SAMPLE SIZE

Sr.No Taluka Name No. of HH to No. of HH No. No. villages/

be surveyed surveyed villages wards
covered (%)

1 Anand 686 686 42 14 (33.33)

2 Umreth 146 147 37 10 (27.02)
3 Sojitra 79 79 25 06 (24.00)
4 Petlad 293 293 55 16 (29.09)
5 Borsad 247 246 64 13 (20.31)
6 Anklav 136 130 32 07 (21.87)
7 Khambhat 243 149 56 18 (32.14)
8 Tarapur 51 50 42 09 (21.42)
Total 1881 1780 353 93 (26.34)
GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION OF VILLAGES COVERED IN HH SURVEY
 EXPANSION FACTORS IN HH SURVEY
A-A*(C+C*D/B)/B
Expansion factor = ---------------------
B-C-D
Where, A = Total number of HH in the original list, B = Total number of HH selected as the original sample ≠ 0.
C = Number of sample HH that are ineligible =0. D = Number of sample HH where no response is obtained = 0.

TAZ Population Household Number of HH No. of HH Expansion

2004 (HH) Size in List (A) Surveyed Factor =
(B) A/B

Anand 532560 4.51 118084 686 172.13

Anklav 139676 4.79 29160 130 224.30

Borsad 360903 4.39 82210 246 334.18

Khambhat 270736 4.19 64615 149 433.6

Tarapur 78662 6.20 12687 110 115.34

Sojitra 27108 4.16 6516 79 82.50

Umreth 168472 4.97 33898 147 230.60

Petlad 275339 4.11 66992 293 228.64

 HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS

Sr. No. Taluka - Mean HH Std. Dev. Trips/HH Trips/Person

Region Size HH Size

1 Anand 4.51 1.83 1.33 0.29

2 Anklav 4.79 1.91 1.59 0.33

3 Borsad 4.39 1.59 1.10 0.25

4 Khambhat 4.19 1.20 1.51 0.36

5 Tarapur 6.2 3.17 1.94 0.31

6 Sojitra 4.16 1.68 2.20 0.52

7 Umreth 4.97 2.10 0.83 0.17

8 Petlad 4.11 1.66 0.93 0.23

ANAND DISTRICT 4.48 1.15 1.48 0.33

 TRIP CHARACTERISTICS
Purpose Anand Umreth Borsad Anklav Petlad Khambhat Sojitra Tarapur Total
Tal
uka

Work 120 12 17 29 20 11 8 14 231

Education 79 6 12 20 12 22 19 18 188

Business 72 9 15 28 13 26 13 0 176

Shopping 20 7 4 23 14 28 7 7 110

Social 59 10 9 29 32 19 29 12 199

Recreation 12 2 3 5 9 1 2 0 34

Health/ 8 4 4 4 18 5 7 1 51
Hospital

Other Purpose 17 8 6 6 33 7 3 1 81

Home Return 299 63 87 64 120 106 84 43 866

Total 686 121 157 208 271 225 172 96 1936

 MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION TECHNIQUE

Dependent variables:
TOT_TRP : Total person Trips per day in zone
WORK_TRP : Work related trips per day in zone
EDU_TRP : Education trips per day in the zone
BUSI_TRP : Business trips per day in the zone
RHO_TRP : Recreation, health-hospital and other trips in the zone
NHBRT_TRP : Non-home based return to home trips in the zone.

Explanatory or independent variables:

TAZPOP : Population of TAZ

VEHOWNSHIP : Vehicle ownership per 100 population in the zone
LICH100POP : Licence holders per 100 population.
 Trip Generation Models Based on Population
TRIP_GEN_POP Models

TOT_TRP = 49.9499 + 0.199624 X TAZ POP ……………………………… (6.2)

(t = 9.36551) ( R2 = 0.9253)

WORK_TRP = - 10.1400 + 0.0390785 X TAZPOP………………………………(6.3)

(t = 7.11924) (R2 = 0.8765)

EDU_TRIP = 1.41425 + 0.0221217 X TAZPOP ……………… ……....(6.4)

(t = 4.35654) (R2 = 0.7198)

BUSI_TRP = 0.495324 + 0.0215397 X TAZPOP ………………………...(6.5)

(t = 4.58721) (R2 = 0.7411)

NHBRT_TRP = 15.7656 + 0.0847471 X TAZPOP ……………....(6.6)

(t = 4.71045) (R2 = 0.7517)
 COMPARISON BETWEEN OBSERVED AND MODELLED TRIPS

1000
900 O BS ERVED TRIPS
800 MO DELLED TRIPS
N O . O F TR IP S

700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0

TAZ

C O MPARISIO N O F O BS ERVED AND MO DELLED TRIPS

 FORCASTING OF EXPLANATORY VARIABLES
POPULATION ESTIMATES FOR TAZs
  POPULATION
TAZ 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
BORSAD 313500 333260 354266 376596 400334
KHAMBHAT 235176 249999 265757 282508 300315

TARAPUR 68329 72636 77215 82082 87255

SOJITRA 23547 25031 26609 28286 30069
PETLAD 239174 254250 270275 287311 305421
ANKLAV 121330 128977 137107 145749 154936
ANAND 462610 491769 522766 555717 590745
UMRETH 146343 155568 165373 175797 186878
 LICENSE HOLDERS PER 100 POPULATION IN TAZs

  LICH100POP
TAZ 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025
BORSAD 6.18 9.45 14.47 22.14 33.88
KHAMBHAT 9.60 14.69 22.48 34.39 52.63
TARAPUR 7.72 11.81 18.07 27.65 42.31
SOJITRA 4.26 6.51 9.96 15.24 23.33
PETLAD 6.62 10.13 15.50 23.73 36.30
ANKLAV 18.99 29.06 44.46 68.04 104.11
ANAND 15.31 23.42 35.84 54.83 83.91
UMRETH 7.52 11.51 17.62 26.96 41.25
 VEHICLE OWNERSHIP PER 100 POPULATION IN TAZs

  VEHOWNSHIP100POP

TAZ 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025

BORSAD 9.46 14.47 22.14 33.88 51.84

KHAMBHAT 15.52 23.75 36.34 55.60 85.09

TARAPUR 17.04 26.08 39.90 61.06 93.43

SOJITRA 11.85 18.14 27.76 42.47 64.99

PETLAD 17.22 26.35 40.32 61.70 94.42

ANKLAV 12.78 19.56 29.92 45.79 70.06

ANAND 20.01 30.62 46.85 71.68 109.69

UMRETH 11.76 18.00 27.55 42.15 64.50

 TOTAL TRIPS IN PCU/DAY
  TOTAL TRIPS Addition in PCU

TAZ 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025

BORSAD 15522.87 16515.28 17576.63 18714.64 19939.33

KHAMBHAT 11659.42 12415.82 13230.30 14111.96 15073.48

TARAPUR 3397.13 3633.73 3896.13 4191.67 4531.24

SOJITRA 1164.80 1254.05 1356.31 1476.24 1620.97

PETLAD 11859.07 12628.86 13457.88 14355.68 15335.28

ANKLAV 6021.14 6422.50 6859.78 7340.74 7876.75

ANAND 22938.99 24413.05 25993.92 27695.70 29537.29

UMRETH 7249.37 7723.22 8234.77 8790.70 9400.17

 TOTAL WORK TRIPS IN PCU/DAY

  WORK TRIPS Addition in PCU

TAZ 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025

BORSAD 2924.27 3110.38 3308.93 3521.10 3748.31

KHAMBHAT 2194.33 2335.21 2486.11 2648.25 2823.25

TARAPUR 635.39 677.80 723.92 774.50 830.65

SOJITRA 215.47 230.67 247.45 266.24 287.68

PETLAD 2230.91 2373.74 2526.51 2690.36 2866.73

ANKLAV 1133.59 1208.86 1290.68 1380.41 1479.99

ANAND 4321.02 4597.00 4892.06 5208.30 5548.43

UMRETH 1363.52 1451.57 1546.03 1647.79 1758.02

 TOTAL EDUCATION TRIPS IN PCU/DAY

  EDUCATION TRIPS Addition in PCU

TAZ 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025

BORSAD 1656.98 1763.03 1876.46 1998.14 2129.13

KHAMBHAT 1244.39 1325.24 1412.34 1506.67 1609.62

TARAPUR 361.79 387.03 415.03 446.54 482.74

SOJITRA 123.31 132.79 143.63 156.31 171.58

PETLAD 1265.46 1347.61 1436.06 1531.80 1636.20

ANKLAV 642.92 686.23 733.62 786.03 844.88

ANAND 2449.30 2606.93 2776.06 2958.27 3155.66

UMRETH 773.37 824.04 878.77 938.29 1003.61

 TOTAL BUSINESS TRIPS IN PCU/DAY

  BUSINESSTRIPS Addition in PCU

TAZ 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025

BORSAD 1492.07 1587.25 1688.96 1797.88 1914.87

KHAMBHAT 1120.37 1192.69 1270.39 1354.23 1445.26

TARAPUR 325.60 347.62 371.75 398.48 428.56

SOJITRA 111.22 119.19 128.08 138.18 149.90

PETLAD 1138.70 1211.85 1290.24 1374.56 1465.69

ANKLAV 580.72 620.12 663.42 711.58 766.06

ANAND 2204.90 2346.39 2498.04 2661.16 2837.47

UMRETH 696.71 741.99 790.75 843.56 901.19

 TOTAL RECREATION, HEALTH- HOSPITAL AND
OTHER TRIPS IN PCU/DAY
  RHOTRIPS Addition in PCU

TAZ 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025

BORSAD 921.75 980.28 1042.74 1109.51 1181.03

KHAMBHAT 692.47 736.89 784.52 835.79 891.26

TARAPUR 203.22 217.12 232.49 249.71 269.40

SOJITRA 71.21 76.55 82.69 89.91 98.66

PETLAD 705.14 750.79 799.96 853.23 911.36

ANKLAV 355.82 377.92 401.25 425.79 451.49

ANAND 1360.26 1446.74 1539.07 1637.84 1743.77

UMRETH 431.17 458.91 488.69 520.82 555.69

 CHOICE OF MODE IN TRIPS OBSERVED IN ANAND DISTRICT

Mode Percentage share in Remark

Sr.No. Trips
1 Two-wheelers 29.56

2 Cars/Jeeps 4.68 Cars Trip 8.60%

3 Taxis 3.47
4 Govt. Cars/Vans 0.45
5 Metadors /Vans 1.36 Three wheelers
plus matadors
6 Auto rickshaws 11.61
(IPTs) share
7 Chhakdo-Rickshaws 1.06 14.03%
8 Buses 30.47 Public Transport
Trip Share 35.75%
9 Rails 5.28
10 Tractors 0.60
11 Cycles 11.16
 ROAD SIDE INTERVIEW SURVEY AT 12 LOCATIONS

5508VEH INTERCEPTED : SAMPLE: 211VEH(8.16%) TO 606VEH(15.43%)

12 HRS CVC, 3HRS SPOT-SPEED
 AVERAGE OCCUPANCY IN PERSONS PER VEHICLE

ANI- DRN- VEH 2.935

TRACTOR 5.51
TRUCK 3.66
BUS 36.38
TAXI 7.28
CHHAKDA 6.194
AUTORIC 5.09
2W-WHEELERS 1.99
CARS 4.62
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

AVE.OCCUPANCY PASSENGER/VEHICLE
 FREQUENCY DISTRIBUTION OF VEHICLES BASED ON OCCUPANCY OF PASSENGERS

800
Car/Jeep
Scooter/M.Cycle
700 Auto Rickshaw
Chhakda
Taxi
600 Bus
Truck
Tractor
500 Animal Vehical
No. of Vehicles

400

300

200

100

0
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 49 51 53 55
No of Passengers

Frequincy distribution of Vehicles

 O-D DATA

IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND THE TRAVEL PATTERNS

AND THE ASSOCIATED DEMANDS ON A
TRANSPORTATION NETWORK OVER ENTIRE REGION

THIS DATA NORMALLY USED

AS THE BASIC INPUT TO TRANSPORTATION MODELS
DEVELOPED TO SUPPORT THE DECISION MAKING
PROCESS OF THE TRANSPORTATION ORGANIZATIONS
OR AGENCIES.
O-D MATRIX DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGY FOR PRESENT STUDY
Problem Identification

Zoning of Area

O-D Matrix Data

O-D Matrix Generation O-D Matrix Generation Surveys
Methods Data Coding and
Analysis

Trip Distribution
Models
Growth Factors Seed O-D Matrix Expansion Factors
Gravity Model
Intervening Opportunity
Models

Final Estimated O-D

Matrix

Yes No
OD-Counts
<=Permissible
Error?

Use Data
 ZONING FOR O-D MATRIX DEVELOPMENT
Zone No. Zone Name Area to be included in zone Remark

1 Borsad Borsad Taluka Zones of

2 Khambhat Khambhat Taluka District of
Anand
3 Tarapur Tarapur Taluka
4 Sojitra Sojitra Taluka ( Internal
5 Petlad Petlad Taluka Zones)
6 Anklav Anklav Taluka
7 Anand Anand Taluka
8 Umreth Umreth Taluka
9 Ahmedabad Ahmedabad District External
10 Kheda Kheda District Zones
11 Vadodara Vadadara District, Traffic to Mumbai, and Maharastra State
12 Bharuch Bharuch District
13 Bhavnagar Bhavnagar District
14 Kuthch Kutch and Surendranagar Districts
15 Panchmahal Panchmaha, dahod and traffic to MadhyaPradesh

16 Banaskantha Banaskantha,Patan, Mehsana, Sabarkantha, Gandhinagar

District and traffic to Rajasthan and Delhi Side
17 Saurastra Rajkot,Jamnagar, Porbandar, Junagadh, Amreli Districts
18 Surat Surat, Navsari, Dang, Narmada and valsad District
TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ZONES OF STUDY AREA
 HHI PERSON TRIPS O-D MATRIX (SAMPLED TRIPS)
DZCODEP

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Total

OZC 1 70 9 2 1 16 25 21 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 150
O 2 9 186 13 0 23 0 10 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 247
D
3 2 13 52 2 0 1 2 0 3 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 77
E
P 4 0 1 2 100 13 0 10 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 139
5 15 23 4 18 87 0 30 0 10 19 8 0 2 0 0 1 1 2 220
6 25 1 0 1 1 59 20 2 0 2 22 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 134
7 27 9 2 9 25 16 525 18 10 25 33 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 701
8 2 0 0 0 0 0 19 44 2 16 5 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 90
9 5 2 2 0 3 0 8 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 25
10 3 1 1 14 17 3 21 16 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 78
11 6 0 0 0 3 20 24 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 62
12 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
16 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
17 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
Total 165 245 78 145 188 126 693 94 27 82 74 2 3 0 0 5 1 3 1931
HHI TOTAL PERSON TRIPS O-D ( TOTAL EXPANDED MATRIX)
 PTPCU FACTORS FOR DIFFERENT MODES
Mode Two- Cars/jeep Metador/ Autoricksha Buses Chhakda Tractors Cycles
wheel Vans w
ers

Mode choice 29.56 4.68 5.28 11.61 30.47 1.06 0.20 11.46
proportio
ns

Occupancy 1.99 4.62 7.28 5.09 36.38 6.19 5.51 1.2

PCU 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 3.0 0.50

PTPCU 0.07427 0.01013 0.00725 0.02281 0.02512 0.00171 0.00108 0.04775

VEHICLES /DAY O-D MATRIX AND DESIRE LINES
TOTAL VEHICLES/DAY O-D DESIRE LINES
 O-D MATRIX ANALYSIS RESULTS
CTAEGORY DATA SOURCE TRIPS IN PCU/DAY PERCENT
TRIP
I-I HHI 59212 25.792

RSI 14251

I-E HHI 7302 20.616

RSI 51420

E-I HHI 6395 21.890

RSI 55955

E-E HHI 151 31.702

RSI 90144
 TRIP ASSIGNMENT
VARIOUS METHODS

ALL OR NOTHING (AON)

INCREMENTAL ASSIGNMENT

STOCH ASSIGNMENT

CAPACITY RESTRAINT ASSIGNMENT

USER EQUILIBRIUM (UE)

STOCHASTIC USER EQUILIBRIUM (SUE)

SYSTEM OPTIMAL ASSIGNMENT (SO)

 LINK PERFORMANCE FUNCTION

T = t0 [1 +  (V/Qp ) ]

Where,

T = congested link travel time

t0 = link free flow travel time

V = link volume

Qp = link capacity

  = parameters
TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT USING CAPACITY RESTRAINT TECHNIQUE
TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT OF OBSERVED FLOW
LINK TRAFFIC FORECAST AND DECIDING CRITICAL LINKS

LINK REQUIRING CAPACITY AUGMENTATION GOVT. OF GUJARAT GROWTH RATES 2005

LINK TRAFFIC FORECAST AND DECIDING CRITICAL LINKS

LINK REQUIRING CAPACITY AUGMENTATION GOVT. OF GUJARAT GROWTH RATES 2010

LINK TRAFFIC FORECAST AND DECIDING CRITICAL LINKS

LINK REQUIRING CAPACITY AUGMENTATION GOVT. OF GUJARAT GROWTH RATES 2015

LINK TRAFFIC FORECAST AND DECIDING CRITICAL LINKS

LINK REQUIRING CAPACITY AUGMENTATION GOVT. OF GUJARAT GROWTH RATES 2020

LINK TRAFFIC FORECAST AND DECIDING CRITICAL LINKS

LINK REQUIRING CAPACITY AUGMENTATION GOVT. OF GUJARAT GROWTH RATES 2025

LINK TRAFFIC FORECAST AND DECIDING CRITICAL LINKS

LINK REQUIRING CAPACITY AUGMENTATION NATIONAL AV. GROWTH RATE 7.5% 2005
 LINK TRAFFIC FORECAST AND DECIDING CRITICAL LINKS

LINK REQUIRING CAPACITY AUGMENTATION NATIONALAVERAGE GROWTH RATE 7.5%

PER YEAR 2010
LINK TRAFFIC FORECAST AND DECIDING CRITICAL LINKS

REQUIRING CAPACITY AUGMENTATION NATIONALAVERAGE GROWTH RATE 7.5% PER

YEAR 2015
LINK TRAFFIC FORECAST AND DECIDING CRITICAL LINKS

LINK REQUIRING CAPACITY AUGMENTATION NATIONALAVERAGE GROWTH RATE 7.5%

PER YEAR 2020
LINK TRAFFIC FORECAST AND DECIDING CRITICAL LINKS

LINK REQUIRING CAPACITY AUGMENTATION NATIONALAVERAGE GROWTH RATE 7.5%

PER YEAR 2025
GIS BASED CRASHES ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY FOR ENHANCING SAFETY
INPUT
Road Inventory Traffic Data Socio-Economic and Other Accident DATABASE
Relevant Data Data

HAZARDOUS LOCATION
System of Road Network/ System of Route Network IDENTIFICATION

Find Total
Other Map
Crash Recording System Number of
Layers
Accident Information and Accidents in 1
Recording System (AIRS) km Road Section
Traffic Information
Management System
(TIMS)
Bridge Management Accident Rate in
Information System (BMIS) each Road
Section
Road Information System
(RIS)

Pavement Management Identification of

Information System (PMIS) Spatial Hazardous
Location/ Black
Analysis Tools
Spot
in GIS

Casual Analysis of Crashes

GIS-T ENVIRONMENT

OUT PUT
Black Spot Maps Strip Charts
 ROAD/ HIGHWAY ELEMENTS AND ITS EFFECT ON CRASHES

1. ROAD LAYOUT AND IMPROVEMENT

CRASHES INDICATORS BY ROAD TYPES IN ANAND DISTRICT
Types of Length Crashes/km Proportion of Total Crashes
Road
km (%) 2004 2005 2006 2004 2005 2006

NE 26.00 1.81 0.65 0.54 0.58 1.61 1.34 1.33

NH 26.00 1.81 4.65 4.42 4.27 11.43 11.04 9.84
SH 497.00 34.60 0.73 0.82 0.76 37.77 39.25 33.51

MDR+ODR 887.59 61.78 0.59 0.57 0.70 49.20 48.37 55.32

+VR
TOTAL 1436.59 100.00 0.74 0.73 0.74 100.0 100.0 100.0

2. CHARACTERISTICS OF PAVEMENT SURFACES

NUMBER OF CRASHES AND FATALITY RATES (2004-2006)

Vehicle- Crashes Fatality Persons Times

Mode of vehicle km per 100 per 100 Killed unsafe
Travelled MVKT* MVKT per 100 compa
(Million) MPKT* red to
* Bus

Two-wheelers 313.040 71.05 11.91 5.99 6.58

Cars + Three 306.03 139.09 13.40 2.53 2.78
wheelers
Buses 40.22 198.91 33.15 0.91 1.00
Truck + LCV + 331.61 157.41 29.75 6.49 7.13
Tractors
Cycles 78.27 68.14 7.24 4.76 5.23

Source: Police Dept, Anand District, PWD & Surveys

*MVKT=Million Vehicle Kilometer Travelled, MPKT**= Million Passenger Kilometer Travelled
CRASH PROPORTIONS BASED ON TYPE OF VEHICLES

Motor
Other Motor Cycle/Scooter
Tractor
Vehicle 17.25%
4.29%
10.58%
Articulated Vehicle
1.69% Moped
1.99%

Tempo
4.75%

Truck Auto Rickshaw

17.10% 23.16%
Bus
3.91% Jeep
Taxi 4.06% Motor Car
1.15% 10.05%
SPATIAL LOCATION OF HIGHWAY CRASHES/ACCIDENTS
ROUTE CREATION AND LINEAR REFERENCING
STRIP CHARTS FOR CRASHES ON NH-8

LENGTH,KM
 BLACK SPOT IDENTIFICATION AND IMPROVEMENT

THE MAIN OBJECTIVE OF CRASH INVESTIGATION IS THE ENGINEERING

CONTEXT IS TO IDENTIFY SITES WHERE COMMON PATTERNS OF
CRASHES CAN BE PREVENTED OR, AT LEAST, THEIR SEVERITY
REDUCED BY INTRODUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS IN THE HIGHWAY
ENVIRONMENT

HAZARDOUS LOCATION IS A ROADWAY SPOT OR SECTION WITH HIGH

CRASH EXPERIENCE (HIGH FREQUENCY, SEVERITY OR RATE)

FatalCrashes  GreivousIn jury

HI =
TotalCrash es
ANOTHER APPROACH USED IS FREQUENCY OF CRASHES, TO ARRIVE AT
HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS. THE AVERAGE OF THREE YEARS CRASHES/KM
IS 20.28. THE 20 CRASHES/KM LENGTH IS CONSIDERED TO OBTAIN
HAZARDOUS LOCATIONS.
BLACK SPOT IDENTIFIED ON NH-8
BLACK SPOT AND HAZARDOUS STRETCHES CH 2 TO 24 KM
BLACK SPOT AND HAZARDOUS STRETCHES CH 20 TO 36 KM
 Q&A

Thank You