Chapter 1
Chapter 1
GeES-4011
Course Contents
1. Introduction
• The concept of urban and region
• Meaning of planning and urban and regional planning
2. Economic & Spatial Theories in Regional Growth
& Planning .
3. Regional Growth-Long Run
4. Issues in urban & regional planning
5. Techniques & Models in regional analysis &
regional planning and their applications.
6. The Growth Pole Theory
Course Objectives
• At the end of the course, students will be able to:
➢ Define the basic concepts of urban and regional planning
➢ Understand the reasons behind regional income disparity
➢ Identify inter and intra-regional planning
➢ Discuss spatial theories in regional growth and planning
➢ Elaborate social and Environmental Issues in Urban
and Regional Planning
➢ Identify the techniques and models employed in urban
and regional analysis and planning
➢ Discusses urban and regional problems and explain
the various strategy of development.
• Points of Discussion:-
–Urban
–Region
–planning
• What is Urban?
• An urban area is the region surrounding a city. Most
inhabitants of urban areas have nonagricultural jobs.
• Urban areas are very developed, meaning there is a
density of human structures such as houses, commercial
buildings, roads, bridges, and railways.
• “urban” differ from one country to another, in all regions
urbanization has been characterized by :
– growth of urban populations; and
– demographic shifts from rural areas to cities;
– overall shifts in the economy from farming towards
industry, technology and service.
• Basically urban refers to the geographic territory within or
close to a city.
• In Ethiopia the criteria used to distinguish urban from rural area
are :-
– population size of 2000 and above,
– 75 per cent of its inhabitants engaged in non agricultural
activities and
– the presence of chartered municipality.
• Region is a geographical area having its own
distinctive characteristics.
• For example According to cultural geographers, there are
Three Cultural regions.
• These are :-
• Formal Cultural Regions
• Functional Cultural Regions
• Vernacular Cultural Regions
1.Formal Cultural Region
• It is an area inhabited by people who have one or
more cultural traits in common.
• The hallmark of a formal culture region is cultural
homogeneity.
2. Functional Cultural Regions
• It is intended to function politically, socially,
economically as one unit.
• Functional Region is thus an area tied together by a
coordinating system such as law, monetary system,
roads, etc.
3. Vernacular Cultural Region
• Vernacular culture region is also called "Popular" or
"Perceptual" Regions.
• It is a region perceived to exist by its inhabitants, as evidenced
by the widespread acceptance and use of special regional name.
• Vernacular regions generally lack sharp borders and the
inhabitants of any given area may claim residence in more
than one such region.
• It grows out of people’s sense of belonging and
identification with a particular region.
• Vernacular Region is an area that ordinary people recognize as a
region.
• For example Most Christians and Muslims regardless of the
religious affiliation, recognize that the term ‘Holy land’ refers
to the Middle East.
Chapter one - Introduction
1. Economic planning:
refers to planning in the developed countries which have
achieved already high level of social and economic development.
Their major concern is accelerated and or balanced economic
development.
2. Developmental planning:
is characteristic of developing countries, which aspire to change
society economically, socially, politically, etc.
The objective of the planning exercise is multifaceted
restructuring of society.
This has affinity to the definition of planning that we have earlier
seen.
Based on Level of Planning Criteria
1. Single level planning:
• It is one carried out at the national level.
• It is sectoral and narrow in scope.
• Most plans in third world countries are single level plans. For instance,
Ethiopia’s First; Second, Third and so on Five-year plans have been single
level plans.
2. Multilevel planning:
• Planning here is structured hierarchically.
• Planning is done for different regions with plan design and implementation
being the responsibilities of the respective region.
• Coordinating bodies may be created to synchronize the regional plans at the
national level.
• The degree of national control depends on the degree of devolution of power.
• Regional Planning during the derg period can be characterized as ‘a sort of
multilevel planning’.
Jurisdiction Criteria
• Based on to what extent the plan is implemented/ enforced, plan were
distinguished as Indicative and imperative planning.
1. Indicative planning:
In a free market economies (capitalist) strict implementation of plans contradicts
the bases of the socioeconomic organization.
Gives general directions about the determination of particular objectives as
production, consumption, manpower, or about public and private investment.
It has no obligation whatsoever, up on the investor.
It is subdivided as:
A. Normative planning:
• The plan may have certain psychological and educational effort but the methods
employed to ensure that it is put in to effect are indirect and constitute of certain
sticks and carrots.
B. Planning by actuation:
• It is cause to act which relies up on budgetary tariff, financial, and fiscal policy
or possibly, up on a public works program to induce business firms to take the
decision required under the plan.
…Cont.d
2. Imperative planning:
In socialist societies means of production are
nationalized.
The government is the sole responsible organ
for socio-economic development.
How much to invest, where to invest, in what to
invest, where to sell the product, at what price,
etc. are decided by the government.
The plan is a legal commitment which has
strictly to be followed.
Function or Area of Concern Criteria
1.Allocative Planning:
Is concerned with the coordination, the resolution of conflicts, ensuring that the
existing system is ticking over efficiently through time in accordance with
evolving policies.
It is sometimes known as regulatory planning.
In the context of the small firm, it will involve the planning of the deliveries of
inputs of raw materials and labour, and the distribution of the final goods.
In the context of the national economy, it would involve month-to-month
regulation of the economy using fiscal and monetary policy.
2. Innovative Planning:
Is no merely planning for the efficiency of the existing system, but is more
concerned with improving/ developing the system as a whole,
Introduces new aims and attempts to mould change on a large scale.
For this reason it is sometimes known as developmental planning.
In the context of the small firm, the marketing of a new product or the opening
of a factory extension within a specific period of time would involve innovative
planning.
Spatial/Non Spatial Criteria
1. Sectoral planning:
is concerned with calibrating the various sectors of the
economy with each other or developing each sector with
differently set priorities.
Thus, developing the agricultural, mining, industrial, and service
branches is sectoral planning.
Similarly, establishing the right ratio between the agricultural,
mining, industrial, and service branches does not necessarily
concern itself with regional issues.
2. Spatial planning:
it concerns itself with the territorial distribution of the
production forces and the integration between various regions.
The creation of spatial framework for the realization of
planning objectives is considered inevitable.
LEVELS OF PLANNING
Regional planning is similar to other types of planning in that
it possess the same basic feature and may be a combination of
the variety of alternative forms already outlined.
But it is different from other types of planning in that it is
planning for a Region.
In general terms Region is a flexible concept, referring to a
continuous and localized area intermediate between National
and Urban regions.
As such regional planning can be seen as fitting in to a
continuum of planning.
Regional planning is the process of formulating and
clarifying social objectives in the ordering of activities in the
supra-urban and sub-national space’.
LEVELS OF PLANNING
Therefore, in the context of regional planning, there could be the
following levels of planning:
a) Inter-National Planning
• This is planning efforts among countries.
• Such countries may share common boundaries or in the same
ecological zone, and may pool their resources together and agree
to solve problems that threatened national boundaries such as
smuggling, illegal migration
• Others countries may agree on a common currency, free
movement of people and goods between one country and the
other like the ECOWAS.
• Such activities can also be at the world level, largely through
United Nation Agencies. Planning is confined to the activities
agreed upon.
…Cont.d
b) National Planning
• National planning is the highest level of planning in a
federation.
• It involves the physical, social and economic forms of planning
of a nation.
• It is a centrally directed allocation of resources (industries,
social institutions, public funds and utilities) to states or regions
in order to achieve balanced development, national
integration and stable political atmosphere.
• The successes of National Planning depend on its ability to
formulate goals that reflect the aspiration of the people and
achieve the articulated goals more successfully than would
unplanned activity.
c) Regional Planning
• This is the second level of planning in a unitary state.
• Within a nation, planning for separate region is described as regional
planning.
• The term ‘region’ can be applied to different countries or groups of
countries or different areas within the same country or even the world.
• Regional planning is considered as a sequence of programmed and
coordinated actions designed to solve current and anticipated problems of a
region.
• It is a kind of response to certain problems of urban region arising from
population growth, increasing urbanization, increasing cost of living and
personal mobility and problems of depressed industrial and rural regions
suffering from economic malaise.
• While urban planning integrates land use planning and transportation
plans to improve the built, economic and social environments of
communities.
• regional planning deals with a still larger environment, at a less detailed
level.
d) State Planning
• This is the second level of planning in a federation.
• It is planning of a political region (state).
• State planning demands exploitation of resources within the
state and channeling of public investment funds and distributing
industries, public utilities and social amenities to the various
Local Government Areas in the state for balanced development.
• State planning is a useful component of the national planning.
e) Sub-Regional Planning
• It is the third level of planning in a unitary state.
• It is a process of exploiting and distributing resources among the
urban and rural areas in order to meet the needs and aspirations
of the local people.
• It addresses peculiar problems that cannot be specifically
addressed by the regional and national forms of planning.
f) Local Planning
• This is the third level of planning in a federated state.
• involves the preparation and implementation of
consistent plan that will guide the development of local
areas within the state.
• It also involves the exploitation of local resources to
meet the peculiar needs and aspirations of the local
people.
• It ensures orderly arrangement of land uses in both urban
and rural communities so as to check incompatible land
uses and haphazard developments.
• It is also concerned with the detailed layout of the
various districts contained in the Urban and Rural
Development Plans.
The Need for Regional Planning
• Regional planning is a category of planning and
development that deals with designing and placing
infrastructure and other elements across a large
area.
• Planning zones may include several towns, cities or
even parts of different states or regions, each of
which could have its own "urban planning" office.
• Thus, it may help to bridge the gap between
“national development” in terms of “objectives” and
the effects on “local communities” in terms of
“actual” development.
…Cont.d
A. Town-Region
Constitutes a relatively small-sized urban community
and its surrounding rural areas.
Areas are economically and socially interdependent.
The town provides high-order services such as local
administration, transportation, manufacturing, commerce,
secondary school education, health and entertainment
services for the rural inhabitants.
The countryside on the other hand provides surplus
food, potable water, industrial raw materials,
employment opportunities in agriculture and forestry,
leisure and recreation for the town dwellers.
B. City-Region
It is also called Metropolitan Region.
is a vast amorphous urban sprawl, consisting of a
central city and many surrounding sub-urban areas,
and share functional relationships in terms of flows
such as people, goods, motor vehicles and mails.
The central city provides local administration,
employment opportunities, transportation,
communication, and wholesaling, educational and
professional services for the sub-urban areas.
In turn, the sub-urbanites serve the central city
dwellers by providing surplus food, pip-borne water,
raw materials, labor and residential accommodation.
C. Megalopolitan Region
This is a complex urbanized region, which contains over 35 million people.
results from coalesce of urban centers of considerable sizes.
in USA, Megalopolis is a highly urbanized, heavily settled region on the
Atlantic Coast stretching from southern Maine to Virginia.
It is(USA megalopolis) one of the first sections of the nation to be settled and
grew rapidly in population over the years as waves of immigrants arrived in the
area.
Communities spread outward from the major cities and eventually the
metropolitan areas began to overlap, forming a corridor of thickly
concentrated urban sprawl.
This single urban complex of staggering dimensions is economically and
socially interdependent.
Examples of Megalopolis in Europe include the Midlands of England, Britain
where towns like Birmingham, Wolver Hampton, Coventry, Dudley, Walsall,
Oldbury etc., form a conurbation called the Black Country
during the 19th century the iron- and steel-producing western portion became known as
the Black Country, named for the black smoke from its factories
Example of Functional Region
Planning/programming Region
Qualitative/intuitive
• Mainly used in the absence of adequate data
• Regional boundaries delineated via this way and results
to vague and ‘Misty’.
Quantitative
• Just analysed where there is adequate/ample data
• Now there is a shift to this approach of regional
delineation and identification
Conceptually, for planning and development,
regionalization as a method of grouping communities
together is viewed as having two stages
Formal Regionalization
Where; Tij gravitational force between town i and j
PiPj mass of the two centres
Dij the distance between the two centres
K constant
It is used to identify the socio-economic or cost issues that may arise in the
newly formed region or how cost-effective is it for a group of communities to
form a region.
Regionalization and the Administration of Regions
Intra-Regional planning
• Resource allocation within regions (with sub-Regions of a Region)
and between various policy fields –economic, social, environmental,
transport, etc.
• The purpose is to achieve a satisfactory relationship between
people, jobs, and environment.
• Social objectives: Provision of housing, social, cultural and
recreational facilities
• Economic objectives: Control of the diseconomies of the congested
cities and distribution of new investment
• Environmental objectives: Quality of urban form and the
prevention of urban sprawl
Interregional planning
• The allocation of resources between regions
• It is more economic, multi-objective, full employment and balanced growth
• The integration of economies of regions is another major objective
Regional Planning and the Management of Regional Development