Optical Sensing Techniques and Signal Processing-3
Optical Sensing Techniques and Signal Processing-3
, NTNU
Content
4.1 Background 4.2 The Fresnel approximation 4.3 The Fraunhofer approximation 4.4 Examples of Fraunhofer diffraction patterns
z "" k (\ 2 L 2 ) / 2
(\ ,L )
4.1 Background
These approximations, which are commonly made in many fields that deal with wave propagation, will be referred to as Fresnel and Fraunhofer approximations. In accordance with our view of the wave propagation phenomenon as a system, we shall attempt to find approximations that are valid for a wide class of input field distributions.
X S I w E2
When calculation a diffraction pattern, we will general regard the intensity of the pattern as the quantity we are seeking.
5
4.1.2 The Huygens-Fresnel principle in rectangular coordinates Before we introducing a series of approximations to the HuygensFresnel principle, it will be helping to first state the principle in more explicit from for the case of rectangular coordinates. As shown in Fig. 4.1, the diffracting aperture is assumed to lie in the plane, and is illuminated in the positive z direction. According to Eq. (3-41), the Huygens-Fresnel principle can be stated as 1 U ( P0 ) ! j
U ( P1 )
jkr 01
r01
cos Uds
(1)
X and the ector r01 here U is the angle bet een th e out ard nor al n pointing ro P0 to P . 1
6
L
\
y
y
P0
P1
Fig. 4.1 Diffraction geometry
Dr. Gao-Wei Chang
z U ( x,y ) ! j
U (\ ,L ) r 2 01
tance r01
jkr01
d\dL
(2)
where the
en exactly by
r01 ! z 2 ( x- 2 ) ( y- 2 )
8
(3)
Dr. Gao-Wei Chang
There have been only two approximations in reaching this expression. 1.One is the approximation inherent in the scalar theory
. The secon is the ass mption that the observation istance is many wavelengths rom the apert re r01 "" .
(1)
10
y
\
"" j
e
K x \ 2 y L 2 2z
x z
11
Note:
2 1 2
x \ 2 y L 2 ) ( ) ! z 1 ( z z
x \ z
y L z
?x \ z
y L
A
Dr. Gao-Wei Chang
12
as the term
x \ 2 y L 2 ( z ) ( z )
is sufficiently small. The first Rayleigh Sommerfeld sol for diffraction between two parallel planes is then approximated by
jk [ z
1 ( x\ ) 2 ( yL) 2 ] 2z
e 1 U ( x, y) ! U (\,L) jP 7
r01
z d\ dL
13
( integrand is supposed to be well approximated by the first term only in the binomial expansion, i.e, r01 ! z In addition, the aperture points and the observation points are confined to the ( \ , L ) plane and the (x,y) plane ,respectively. )
Thus, we see
( j ? x \ ) 2 ( y L ) 2 A e jkz 2z d\ dL U ( x, y ) ! U (\ ,L )e jP z k
14
U (\ ,L )h( x \ , y L )d\
g
dL
(2a)
Obviously, we may regard the phenomenon of wave propagation as the behavior of a linear system.
e jkz jk 2 h ( x, y ) ! exp[ ( x y 2 )] jP z 2z
(2b)
15
Another form of Eq.(1) is found if the term e is factored outside the integral signs, it yields
k (x y ) z
24
(3)
which we recognize (aside from the multiplicative factors) to be the Fourier transform of the complex field just to the right of the aperture and a quadratic phase exponential.
16
We refer to both forms of the result Eqs. (1) and (3), as the Fresnel diffraction integral . When this approximation is valid, the observer is said to be in the region of Fresnel diffraction or equivalently in the near field of the aperture. Note: In Eq(1),the quadratic phase exponential in the integrand
j k ( x \ ) 2 ( y L ) 2 2z
17
do not always have positive phase for z> .Its sign depends on the direction of wave propagation. (e.g, diverging of converging spherical waves) In the next subsection ,we deal with the problem of positive or negative phase for the quadratic phase exponent.
18
4.2.1 Positive vs. Negative Phases Since we treat wave propagation as the behavior of a linear system as described in chap.3 of Goodman), it is important to descries the direction of wave propagation. As a example of description of wave propagation direction, if we move in space in such a way as to intercept portions of a wavefield (of wavefronts ) that were emitted earlier in time.
19
f ( z, t )
z
tc
f ( z zc , t )
z t
tc f (t tc ) ! f ( z, t tc )
zc f ( z 2 zc , t )
z
2tc
2 zc
In the above two illustrations, we assume the wave speed v=zc/tc where zc and tc are both fixed real numbers.
20
r
k
21
j k r
,where
r ! ar r
ak
a r ,then
( Positive phase)
1 j k r 1 j k r ! e e r r
a k ! a r
22
1 j k r 1 j k r e ! e r r
i lies a c er i
Note For spherical wave ,we say they are diverging or converging ones instead or saying that they are emitted earlier in time or later in time.
23
Earlier in time
j 2Tv ( t tc )
j 2Tvt
j Tv t tc
Positive phase
The term e standing for the time dependence of a traveling wave implies that we have chosen our phasors to rotate in the clockwise direction.
j 2Tvt
24
Therefore, we have the following seasonings Earlier in time Positive phase (e.g., diverging spherical waves) Later in time Negative phase (e.g., converging spherical waves) Note Earlier in time means the general statement that if we move in space in such a way as to intercept wavefronts (or portions of a wave-field ) that were emitted earlier in time.
25
To describe the direction of wave propagation for plane waves, we cannot use the term diverging or converging .Instead .we employ the general statement ,for the following situations.
ay
Propagation direction
Uc " 0
az
j 2TEy
, (where E > )
e j 2TEy e j 2Tvt ! e
j 2Tv ( t tc
, where
1 ! Ey c v
We may say that ,if we move in the positive y direction , the argument of the exponential increases in a positive sense, and thus we are moving to a portion of the wave that was emitted earlier in time.
27
or U c
Uc
Propagation direction
28
xG xu U(p ) ! (G xn U xn )ds 4T
29
( )
e e G ! ~ r1 r1
jkr 1
(2)
Note we put the subscript -, i.e, G- to signify this kind of Green func.
30
( )
x k 1 ( p0 ) ! ( xn )ds T
where the Green func. proposed by Kirchhoff
(4)
e jkr01 Gk ! r01
31
xGK ! (GK ) an xn x e j r01 ! ar01 ( ) an xr01 r01 1 j r01 j r01 2 ! o (r01 an ) j e e (1) r 01 r01 1 e j r01 ! o (r01 an )( j ) r01 r01
32
as K
2T 1 "" or r1 P
r "" P
(5)
xGK 2T e j r 1 ! j cos(r 1, n ) xn P r1
Finally, substituting Eq.(5) into Eq.(4) yields
jkr01 1 X X ( p0 ) ! ( p1 ) cos(r01, an )ds r01 jP
33
Optoelectronic Systems Lab., Dept. of Mechatronic Tech., NTNU 4.2.2 Accuracy of Fresnel Approximation
Parabolic wavelet
(4.14)
z
jkr01
g
U \ ,L
r01
Spherical wavelet
(or
1 x \ r01 ! z 1 2 z
where
x \ y L r ! z z z
y L z
1 x \ y L 8 z z
2
.
34
1 b
1 2
1 1 2 ! 1 b b . 2 8
x \ y L ! z z
2 2
where
jkz b 8
<<1
T z P For example
?x \
y L
A
( y) x,
1cm
( y) x,
( , ) 36
2 2
!6
or z 0.4 m
X az
This sufficient condition implies that the distance z must be relatively much larger than T x \ y L ma P 37 Dr. Gao-Wei Chang
1 b
1 2
1 1 1 2 ! 1 b b . ! 1 b HOT 2 2 8
2 2
x \ y L where b ! z z
we can see that the sufficient condition leads to a sufficient small value of b
However, this condition is not necessary. In the following, we will give the next comment that accuracy can be expected for much smaller values of z (i.e., the observation point (x , y) can be located at a relatively much shorter distance to an arbitrary aperture point on the ( , ) plane)
38
We basically malcr use of the argument that for the convolution integral of Eq.(4-14), if the major contribution to the integral comes from points ( , ) for which x and y, then the values of the HOTs of the expansion become sufficiently small.(That is, as ( , ) is close to (x , y) x \ y L b! z z
1 Consequently, b
39
e jkz or U x, y ! gU \ ,L e jPz
x \ jT Pz
e jkz jT 2 Y 2 X U ,L \ e d\dL jP z 7
where
X !
x \
and
Y!
y L Pz
Pz
40
jkz
T Pz
?x
2 y L
2 A
2
d dL
2
y L Pz
d\dL
can be governed by the convolution integral of the function with a second function (i.e., U( , )) that is smooth and e jT X Y
slowly varying for the rang 2 < X < 2 and 2 < Y < 2. Obviously, outside this range, the convolution integral does not yield a significant addition.
2 2
g
jTX 2
dX ! 1 is governed by
e jTX dX
g
is well approximated by
e jT X
Y
Y
e jT X
dXdY !
dXdY
Dr. Gao-Wei Chang
41
Finally, it appears that the majority of the contribution to the convolution integral for the range - < X < and - < Y < or the aperture area comes from that for a square in the ( , ) plane with width and Pz 4 centered on the point = x, = y \ y L (i.e., the range 2 < <2 and 2< <2 or Pz
Pz
\
1 b 12
\ L ! z z
4 Pz
X az
is small enough.
42
1 U P0
! jP
where r
43
T Pz
we may say that for the Fresnel approximation (for the aperture area or the corresponding square area) to give accurate results, it is not necessary that the HOTs of the expansion be small, only that they do not change the value of the Fresnel diffraction integral significantly.
Note
From Goodmans treatment (P. 9 7 ), we see that
X
jTX 2
dX
jTX 2
g
dX
or
jTX 2
dX
Where the width of the diffracting aperture is larger than the length of the region 2 < X < 2
44
For the scaled quadratic-phase exponential of Eqs.(4-14) and Eq.(4-1 ), the corresponding conclusion is that the majority of the contribution to the convolution integral comes from a square in the ( , ) plane, with width 4 Pz and centered on the point ( = x , = y) In effect, 1. When this square lie entirely within the open portion of the aperture, the field observed at distance z is, to a good approximation, what it would be if the aperture were not present. (This is corresponding to the light region)
45
2. When the square lies entirely behind the obstruction of the aperture, then the observation point lies in a region that is, to a good approximation, dark due to the shadow of the aperture. 3. When the square bridges the open and obstructed parts of the aperture, then the observed field is in the transition (or gray) region between light and dark.
For the case of a one-dimensional rectangular slit, boundaries among the regions mentioned above can be shown to be parabolas, as illustrated in the following figure.
46
2 Pz
2 Pz
47
Thus, the upper (or lower) boundary between the transition (or gray) region and the light region can be expressed by
x w
48
4.2.3 The Fresnel approximation and the Angular Spectrum In this subsection, we will see that the Fourier transform of the Fresnel diffraction impression response identical to the transfer func. of the wave propagation phenomenon in the angular spectrum method of analysis, under the condition of small angles. From Eqs.(4-15)and (4-1 ), We have
U ( x y) !
g
U (^ L )h(E ^
jk
y L )d\dL
h( x y ) !
e
j
xk (x y ) x
Dr. Gao-Wei Chang
49
F [h( x, y )] !
H
j
( F
fx fy
,
)!
z g e
k (x y ) z
j T ( f x x f y y)
dxdy
g e
e
-j
T 2 2 (x y ) z
j 2T ( f x x f y y )
dxdy
can be rewritten a
T ( f x ( P z ) f y ( Pz ) ) g P g
T ( p q ) dpdq Pz
where
p ! x Pz
and
q ! y Pz
50
( f
x
x Pz
jT ]! ( x Pz Pz
fx
where
p ! x Pz
f
y
P
2
2 jT [ y 2 y (P z ) Pz
( f y Pz)
jT ]! Pz
( y Pz f y )
q
where q ! y Pz as a result,
HF (
jkz
T ( f x ( Pz ) f Pz
y ( Pz )
1 jPz
T ( p q ) dpdq=1 Pz
51
HF(
)!
e e
On the other hand, the transfer function of the wave propagation phenomenon in the angular spectrum method of analysis is expressed by
Ha
jk ! e y
-( ( x ) -( -
under the condition of small angles (as noted below the term)
jkz
(P x) (P y)
1 (P )2 1 (P f )2 fx y ) 2 2
f 2 f 2 ) x y
can be approximated by
e j z jTPz ( e e
j z (1
T (because k ! ) P
52
) ,
, otherwise
(Note: because
!z o1
x \ y L 1 ( ) ( ) z z
2
1 2
""
T 4P [
y L 2] x \
max
an r o
XX an r
53
Therefore, we have shown that the FT of the Fresnel diffraction impulse response
H f x f y !Ha f x f y
Which is the transfer function of the wave propagation phenomenon in the angular spectrum method of analysis under the condition of small angles.
54
o1
r r
o1
o1
55
\ 1 L ) ) 2( ) z z L 2\x z 2Ly ! z (1 2z 2z
2 2
1 r o1 $ z(1 2 (
as x y \ L
\x Ly r o1 $ z z z
Recall the Rayleigh Sommerfeld sol, (for the paraxial condition
U ( x, y ) ! jP U (\ ,L )
j 2 P
e ro
56
jk r o
cos(
r o , a n ) d\ dL
Dr. Gao-Wei Chang
U (\ ,L ) e jPz
k j (\ x L y ) d\ dL z
U ( x, y ) !
jkz j
U (\ ,L ) e jPz
T (\x Ly ) Pz
d\dL
This Fresnel diffraction eq. expresses the field U \ ,L observed on the right hand spherical cap as the FT of the filed U(x,y) on the left-hand spherical cap.
Comparison of the result with Eq(4-17),the Fresnel diffraction integral (including Fourier-transform-like operation)
Dr. Gao-Wei Chang
57
e e jPz
jkz
k 2 2 (x y ) 2z
g [
(\ ,L )
k 2 2 (\ L ) ] 2z
j
2T ( x\ y L ) d\dL Pz
Note: Recall
58
The two quadratic phase factors in Eq(4-17)are in fact simply paraxial representations of spherical phase surfaces, (since the Rayleigh Sommerfeld sol. can be applied only to the planar screens), and it is therefore reasonable that moving to the spheres has eliminated them. For the diffraction between two spherical caps, it is not really valid to use the Rayleigh-Sommerfeld result as the basis for the calculation (only for the diffraction between two parallel planes). However, the Kirchhoff analysis remains valid, and its predictions are the same as those of the Rayleigh-Sommerfeld approach provided paraxial conditions hold.
59
e e Pz
2
2z
( x 2 y 2) g
g [U (\ ,L ) e
2z
(\ 2 L 2)
(4-17)
If the exponent
k [ ( 2z
We have
T z "" P or
)]
max
\ L
a a
60
z ""
\ L
The observed filed strength U(x,y) can be found directly from a FT k j0 of the aperture function itself (because j 2 z (\ L ) ) e 1
2 2
e e U ( x, y ) !
jkz
k 2 2 (x y ) g 2z
jPz
g
U (\ , )
j 2T ( f x\ f y )
d\d
(4-25)
(Aside from the multiplicative phase factors, this expression is simply the FT of the aperture distribution) where
fx
x and Pz
y Pz
(4-2 )
61
U ( x, y ) ! U ( x, y ) !
jkz j
U (\ ,L ) e jP z
g U (
jkz
h x y
!e
jP z
k z
y
(4-1 )
62
Comparison of Eqs(4-15)and (4-1 ) with Eqs.(4-25)and (4-2 ) tell us that there is no transfer function for the Fraunhofer (or far-field) diffraction since Eqs(4-25) and (4-2 ) do not include impulse response. Nonetheless, since Fraunhofer diffraction is only a special case of Fresnel diffraction, the transfer function Eq(4-21) remains valid throughout both the Fresnel and the Fraunhofer regimes. That is, it is always possible to calculate diffracted field in the Fraunhofer region by retaining the full accuracy of the Fresnel approximation.
Treating the wave propagation phenomenon as a linear system
63
U ( x, y ) !
k 2 2 (x y ) jkz 2 z e e j
jPz
F{U (\ ,L )}
f X ! x / Pz fY ! y / P z
64
4.4.2 Circular Aperture Suggests that the Fourier transform of Eq.(4-25) be rewritten as a Fourier-Bessel transform. Thus if K is the radius coordinate in the observation plane, we have
U(
e jkz k 2 ! exp( j ) F {U ( q )} jP z 2z p ! r / Pz
65
4.4.3 Thin Sinusoidal Amplitude Grating In practice, diffracting objects can be far more complex. In accord with our earlier definition (3- ),the amplitude transmittance of a screen is defined as the ratio of the complex field amplitude immediately behind the screen to the complex amplitude incident on the screen . Until now ,our examples have involved only transmittance functions of the form
t A (\ ,L )
1 0
66
Spatial patterns of phase shift can be introduced by means of transparent plates of varying thickness, thus extending the realizable values of tA to all points within or on the unit circle in the complex plane. As an example of this more general type of diffracting screen, consider a thin sinusoidal amplitude grating defined by the amplitude transmittance function
(4-33)
where for simplicity we have assumed that the grating structure is bounded by a square aperture of width 2w. The parameter m represents the peak-to-peak change of amplitude transmittance across the screen and f0 is the spatial frequency of the grating.
67
(\ or x)
Binary phase grating m j[ sin ( 2 f 0 )] U ( ,y ) ! e 2 rect (
2w
)rect (
2w
68