0% found this document useful (0 votes)
58 views

Type of Informatoin Sought Research

This document discusses and compares qualitative and quantitative research. It explains that qualitative research aims to understand meanings and experiences through methods like interviews, observation, and documents analysis. It produces descriptive data. Quantitative research makes measurements and tests relationships through methods like surveys and experiments. It produces statistical data that can establish causal relationships. Both have benefits depending on the research question and goals.

Uploaded by

Tadiwa Kasuwa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
58 views

Type of Informatoin Sought Research

This document discusses and compares qualitative and quantitative research. It explains that qualitative research aims to understand meanings and experiences through methods like interviews, observation, and documents analysis. It produces descriptive data. Quantitative research makes measurements and tests relationships through methods like surveys and experiments. It produces statistical data that can establish causal relationships. Both have benefits depending on the research question and goals.

Uploaded by

Tadiwa Kasuwa
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 22

Qualitative Research

Quantitative Research
These are the two forms of research paradigms
(Leedy, 1997) which are qualitative and quantitative
These paradigms determine the
 Research approach
 Methods of data collection
 Forms of data analysis
 Methods of data presentations
Qualitative Research
Qualitative research can be defined as ‘multi-method
in focus, involving an interpretive, naturalistic
approach to its subject matter’ Denzin and Lincoln,
1994)
Qualitative research attempts to understand
meanings that people give to their deeds or to social
phenomena
In other words researchers see people from the inside
Analytical induction s a major logic of qualitative
research.
The rule is ‘take one case and develop a working
hypothesis to explain it.
After that, you take another case and examine
whether the hypothesis can explain the new case.
If it fails, you should revise the hypothesis to explain
both cases.
Qualitative research is a way of approaching the
empirical world.
It is inductive-researchers developed concepts,
insights and understandings from patterns in the data
rather than collecting data assess hypothesis, models
or theories
Ways of data collection vary in qualitative research.
Three classic methods of collecting qualitative data
according to Guba and Lincolin (1994) are
 Interviews
 Participatory observation
 Documentary analysis
Qualitative data analysis moves from description of
an event or social setting to a more general
interpretation of its meaning
It involves handling multiple forms of data
Qualitative reports contain rich descriptions and at
times thick descriptions that contain colourful and
unusual data or characters
Qualitative research involves documenting real
events, recording what people say with words,
gestures, observing speech behaviour, studying
written documents or examining visual images.
One major thrust of qualitative research is that it can
be an empowering exercise that helps people to grow
and take charge of their lives and engage in social
change.
In qualitative research one must be familiar with the
research concerns, theoretical underpinnings of the
qualitative approach and ability to ask questions.
Qualitative research focuses on subjective meanings,
definitions, metaphors, symbols and descriptions of
specific cases.
Quantitative research
Involves making useful descriptions of observed
phenomena and explaining the possible relationships
between descriptive surveys, longitudinal
developments, correlational and ex post factors
research designs (Leedy, 1997).
Descriptive research method is described by Gall Borg
and Gall (1996) as the most basic of quantitative
research methods.
Advocates of quantitative methods argue that only by
using such methods can social sciences become truly
scientific.
Descriptive surveys measures the characteristics of a
sample at one point in time.
Longitudinal research investigates changes in a
sample over a period of time
Correlational studies build on the knowledge gained
from descriptive studies to explore potential
relationships between phenomena.
Ex post facto also called casual-comparative research
describes relationship between something that
occurred in the past (after the fact) and subsequent
responses.
Quantitative research is generally an iterative process
where by evidence is evaluated, theories and
hypothesis are refined and tested.
Statistics is the most widely used branch of
mathematics in quantitative research
A fundamental principle is that correlation does not
imply causation.
This principle follows from the fact that it is always
possible a spurious relationship exists for variables
between which covariance is found in some degree
(Cohen et al., 1996).
Associations may be examined between any
combination of continuous and categorical variables
using methods of statistics.
Measurement is often regarded as beng only a means
by which observations are expressed numerically in
order to investigate casual relations or associations.
Statistical tables and graphs are often used to present
results.
Comparison between quantitative and
qualitative research
Basically quantitative research is objective while
qualitative is subjective.
Quantitative research seeks explanatory laws and
qualitative research aims at in-depth description.
Qualitative measures what it assumes to be static
reality in hopes of developing universal laws
Qualitative research is an exploration of what is
assumed to be dynamic reality.
It does not claim that what is discovered in the
process is universal
QUANTITATIVE QUALITATIVE
Objective Subjective
“Hard” Science “Soft” science
Research questions: Research question:
How many? Strength of What? Why?
association? Literature review may
Literature review must be done as study
be done early in study progress or afterwards
Test theory Develops theory
One reality: focus is Multiple realities: focus
concise and narrow is complex
Facts are value free and Facts are value-laden
unbiased. and biased
Reduction, control and Discovery, description,
precision understanding, shared
and interpretation
Measurable Interpretive
Mechanistic: parts equal Organismic: whole is
the whole greater than parts
Report statistical Report rich, narrative,
analysis individual,
interpretation.
Basic element of Basic element of
analysis is numbers analysis is words/ideas
In general, qualitative research generates rich,
detailed and valid (process) data that contribute to in-
depth understanding of the context.
Quantitative research generates reliable population
based and generalised data and is well suited to
establish cause and effect relationships
Whether to choose quantitative or qualitative design
depend on the
 nature of the project,
 the type of information needed,
 the context of the study and
 the availability of resources (time, money and human)

You might also like