The Site of The First Mass
The Site of The First Mass
WHO IS FERDINAND
MAGELLAN?
The King gave Magellan what they needed and the two expressed their
desire to become brothers.
After a few days Magellan was introduced to the King’s brother who is also a
King of another Island, Rajah Siawi ( Rajah Siagu). Pigafetta described this
King as the most handsome of all.
CONTROVERSIES BETWEEN LIMASAWA AND
BUTUAN/MASAO
AS THE SITE OF the first MASS IN THE PHILIPPINES.
Is it limasawa or butuan?
Dr. Sonia M. Zaide presented evidences that the site
of the first mass was not in Limasawa but in Masao,
Butuan, Agusan del Norte.
~ Carlo Amoretti (1800) of Ambrosiana Library said that Mazua where Magellan landed before and the Limasawa mentioned by Fr.
Francisco Combes are the same.
~ Limasawa was supported by Fr. Pablo Pastells, Dr. Trinidad H. Pardo de Tavera, Jaime de Veyra and James Robertson.
~ Fr. Francisco Colin wrote a book about the spread of Christianity in the Philippines but could not exactly determine the site, but he
based in “Limasawa” claim because of the writings of Antonio Herrera who based his writings to Andres San Martin that the site was
in “Mazaua”
Limasawa became part of Magellan’s expedition because of the writings of
Father Francisco Combes
( Limasawa on his “ Historia de Mindnao” in 1667)
Jaime de Veyra stated that the first mass was celebrated in
Limasawa not in Butuan.
Francisco Albo (Pilot of the Magellan’s flagship does not mention the
first mass but he writes that they erected a cross on a mountain
which overlooked three islands the west and southwest.
Father Bernard studied all the Pigafetta’s maps, which
place in Mazaua off the tip of the larger island of leyte. A
check with the modern maps will show that this jibes with
Limasawa and not in Masao or Butuan.
Evidences found in Limasawa:
The distance to Cebu from Mazaua based on Pigafetta was 35 leagues ( 140 miles). The distance from Limasawa to Cebu is only 80 miles.
“ After a few days, Magellan was introduced to the King’s brother who was also the king of another island. They went to this island and
Pigafetta reported that they saw mines of gold. The gold was abundant that parts of the ship and the house of the second king were made
of gold. Pigafetta described this king as the most handsome of all the men that he saw in this place. He was also adorned with silk and gold
accessories like a golden dagger, which he carried with him in a wooden ploshed sheat. This king was named Raia Calambu, King of Zuluan
and Calagan ( Butuan and Caragua” and the first king is Raia Siagu. On March 31st, which happened to be Easter Sunday, Magellan
ordered the chaplain to preside a Mass by the shore. The two kings and the natives attended the mass with the Spaniards. The chaplain
who presided the mass is Fr. Pedro Valderrama.”
WHICH OF THE FOLLOWING CLAIMS DO YOU
THINK IS TRUE AND CONVINCING?.
IS IT LIMASAWA OR BUTUAN?
R.A NO.2733
AN ACT TO DECLARE THE SITE IN MAGALLANES,
LIMASAWA ISLAND IN THE PROVINCE OF LEYTE,
WHERE THE FIRST MASS IN THE PHILIPPINES WAS
HELD AS A NATIONAL SHRINE, TO PROVIDE FOR
THE PRESERVATION OF HISTORICAL MONUMENTS
AND LANDMARKS THEREAT, AND FOR OTHER
PURPOSES.
• Confusion on meeting the king of Butuan
• According to Bernad (2002), the confusion originated on the
misinterpretation of some of the 17th century historians such as Colin
and Combes, often yielding incorrect representation of Magellan's
voyage, which ultimately led to the misconception of the first mass
being held at Butuan, rather than Limasawa. The writings of the
previous historians failed to depict the correct route of Magellan's ships
toward the Philippines. Some write-ups accounted for the entrance of
the ships from the southern part of the country whereas the account
of Antonio Pigafetta revealed the entrance from the eastern part of the
country, from the direction of the Pacific region
Government position
• The National Historical Institute (NHI) first took action on the Limasawa–Butuan
controversy in 1980 followed by the creation of two more panels in 1995 and 2008. The
government has consistently concluded Limasawa as the site of the first Easter Sunday
Mass in the country. Another panel led by prominent historian Resil B. Mojares was
formed in 2018 by now National Historical Commission of the Philippines (NHCP) to
further review continued claims in favor of Butuan. The pro-Butuan group presented
non-eyewitness accounts decades after the Mass as their proofs. Meanwhile, the pro-
Limasawa group provided the panel coordinates of Mazaua given by the eyewitnesses,
studies and projects that retraced the Magellan–Elcano expedition using modern
navigational instruments, and the copies of Pigafetta's original accounts.
• Ahead of the quincentennial celebration of the Christianization of the Philippines, the
NHCP dismissed the Butuan claim due to insufficient evidences to change the
government's current position and reaffirmed Limasawa as the site of the first Easter
Sunday Mass in the country. The panel also endorsed the changes proposed by historian
Rolando Borrinaga to recognize Triana instead of Magallanes as the specific site of the
mass in Limasawa and Saub Point in Triana as the site of the cross planted by the
Magellan expedition.
• With all the sources and evidences found and presented by the
Government, Therefore, the first mass in the Philippines was held on
March 31, 1521, Easter Sunday. It was officiated by the Priest named
Father Pedro Valderrama in the shore of Mazaua in Pigafetta’s Journal,
whom people believe is the town specifically in the shore of Limasawa
in Southern Leyte. It is popularly known as the birthplace of the
Church in the Philippines.
1. When did the first mass happen?
a. March 31, 1521
b. March 30, 1521
c. March 31, 1512
d. March 31, 1251
2. An Act to Declare the Site in Magallanes, Limasawa Island in the Province of Leyte, Where the First
Mass in the Philippines was Held as a National Shrine, to Provide for the Preservation of Historical
Monuments and Landmarks Thereat, and for Other Purposes.
a. Republic Act No. 2733
b. Republic Act No. 2373
c. Republic Act No. 3723
d. Republic Act No. 7233