Chapter2 - 2nd Lecture
Chapter2 - 2nd Lecture
Processes
USM Equipment
Min Components
1) Power Supply
2) Transducer
3) Tool holder
4) Tool
5) Abrasives & Slurry
Mechanism for Material Removal
Occurs when the abrasive particles, suspended in the slurry between the
tool and workpiece, are struck by the down stroke of the vibration tool.
The impact propels the particles across the cutting gap, hammering them
into the surface of both tool and workpiece.
Collapse of the cavitation bubbles in the abrasive suspension results in
very high local pressures.
Under the action of the associated shock waves on the abrasive particles,
micro cracks are generated at the interface of the workpiece – brittle
fracture.
The brittle fracture lead to chipping of particles from the workpiece.
Mechanics of USM
The metal removal in an USM process is
a) Amplitude of vibration– 15 – 50 μm
b) Frequency of vibration – 19 – 25 kHz
c) Feed force – related to tool dimensions
d) Feed pressure
e) Abrasive size – 15 μm – 150 μm
f) Abrasive material – Al2O3 , SiC, B4C , Boron Silioncarbide, Diamond
g) Flow strength of work material
h) Flow strength of the tool material
i) Contact area of the tool
j) Volume concentration of abrasive in water slurry
MRR vs Frequency and Amplitude
With an theor
y
increase in
f increases
frequency of the tool actua
l
head the
MR
MR
R
R
Material Removal
Rate (MRR)
should increase Frequency ( f Amplitude ( A
) )
proportionally. The nature of the variation with respect to MMR
with frequency and amplitude is shown in the
However, there is a figure
slight variation in
When the amplitude of the vibration increases the
the MRR with
MRR is expected to increase.
frequency.
MRR vs Abrasive Diameter and Concentration
MRR also B4C
theor
rise y
should
with
proportionatel
mean grain diameter
the d'.
'
actua Si
MR
MR
R
R
l C
y
When ' d' becomes too
large,
the tendency
crushing d C (abrasive conc.
%)
increases. of the The nature of the variation with respect to MMR
Vs Abrasive diameter and Concentration of
Concentration control abrasives
abrasives s
directly the
producing impact per grain
cycle.
number of
MRR is proportional to s 4'C1/ so after 'C’ rises to 30% MRR increase is
‘
not
very fast.
MRR vs Feed Force
theor
y
actua
MRR
l
(Q)
Feed force ( f
)
75
50
tungsten
carbide
25
50 150
100
Mean grain dia, (micro
M)
The figure shows that the surface finish is more sensitive to grain size in case of glass
i.e. Because in case of a harder material the size of the fragments dislodged through a
brittle fracture does not depend much on the size of the impacting particles.
Recap….
Various Work Samples Machined by USM
Holes by
USM
Complex Designs by
USM
USM
Applications
USM best suited for hard, brittle materials, such as
is ceramics,
carbides, glass, precious stones, and hardened steels.
Capability
With fine abrasives, tolerance of 0.0125 mm or better can be held.
Ra varies between 0.2 – 1.6 µm.
wear from the action of abrasive grit with a ratio that ranges
hypodermic needles.