Poverty can be defined and understood in various ways. It involves more than just a lack of income and resources, but also a lack of basic capabilities and well-being. Poverty reduces opportunities for people to live fulfilling lives and achieve their potential. Different perspectives view poverty through dimensions like income, needs, capabilities, well-being, and inequality. Understanding poverty requires considering both quantitative and qualitative factors in people's lives.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
30 views
Chapter Two - Defining Poverty
Poverty can be defined and understood in various ways. It involves more than just a lack of income and resources, but also a lack of basic capabilities and well-being. Poverty reduces opportunities for people to live fulfilling lives and achieve their potential. Different perspectives view poverty through dimensions like income, needs, capabilities, well-being, and inequality. Understanding poverty requires considering both quantitative and qualitative factors in people's lives.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 31
Chapter Two: Poverty
What is poverty?
Poverty is the lack of, or the inability to achieve, a
socially acceptable standard of living. LACK : The base case situation for the definition of poverty is that where individuals lack domination over economic resources. For example, an individual may be considered poor if he/she lacks basic food or shelter or, equivalently, if he/she lacks income to buy these basic needs. POVERTY AS A MATERIAL CONCEPT • People are poor because they do not have something they need, or because they lack the resources to get the things they need. • NEED • The first set of definitions understands poverty as a lack of material goods or services. People ‘need’ things like such as food, clothing, or shelter. • LIMITED RESOURCES • Needs are closely linked to resources every need is a need for something. Poverty can be taken to refer to circumstances in which people lack the income, wealth or resources to acquire or consume things which they need. • INEQUALITY • People may be held to be poor because they are disadvantaged by comparison with others in society. • DEPENDENCY • Poor people are sometimes taken to be those who receive social benefits in consequence of their lack of means. E.g,,,Beggar • The sociologist Georg Simmel argued that ‘poverty’, in sociological terms, referred not to all people on low incomes, but to those who were dependent: • The poor person, sociologically speaking, is the individual who receives assistance because of the lack of means. Cont,,,
“The human rights approach underlines the
multidimensional nature of poverty, describing poverty in terms of a range of interrelated and mutually reinforcing lack, and drawing attention to the stigma, discrimination, insecurity and social exclusion associated with poverty” Office of the united nations high commissioner for human rights principles and guidelines for human rights approach to poverty reduction strategies . Poverty reduction has been commonly certified by the international community as the overarching goal of development. Less agreement appears to exist on what this poverty actually is and how it should be measured. Different understandings of poverty, different approaches and ways of thinking about poverty lead to different ways to tackle it. The causes of poverty A. Corruption B. Lack of Education C. Political Instability, Wars, Civil Wars D. Natural and Geographical Characteristics One route for investigating the causes of poverty is to examine the dimensions highlighted by poor people: ■ Lack of income and assets to attain basic necessities — food, shelter, clothing, and acceptable levels of health and education. ■ Sense of voicelessness and powerlessness in the institutions of state and society. ■ Vulnerability to bad shocks, linked to an inability to cope with them. To understand the determinants of poverty in all its dimensions, it helps to think in terms of people’s assets, the returns to (or productivity of) these assets, and the volatility of returns. These assets are of several kinds: ■ Human assets, such as the capacity for basic labor, skills, and good health. ■ Natural assets, such as land. ■ Physical assets, such as access to infrastructure. ■ Financial assets, such as savings and access to credit. ■ Social assets, such as networks of contacts and reciprocal obligations that can be called on in time of need, and political influence over resources. Models of Poverty: Absolute and Relative Whichever conceptualization is used it is possible to imagine that there is a threshold minimum or subsistence level under which poverty is unacceptable (absolute poverty, extreme or serious poverty). Relative poverty is defined by referring to an unacceptable distance from the average or median. However, even absolute poverty is difficult to define in other than relative terms. Already in 1776 Adam Smith thought that the minimum publicly perceived acceptable level of “necessaries” even for “the poorest creditable person” must have tended to vary and change. In those days, it was a linen shirt in Europe - and leather shoes in England. Now it is no doubt a mobile phone. “Absolute poverty” refers to an unequivocal standard necessary for survival (calories necessary for survival, adequate shelter against elements, proper clothing). Absolute poverty is “a condition characterized by severe deprivation of basic human needs, including food, safe drinking water, sanitation facilities, health, shelter, education and information. It depends not only on income but also on access to social services” (United Nations, Copenhagen Declaration, 1995). Absolute poverty is sometimes called “extreme poverty.” Relative poverty “Relative poverty” refers to deprivation that is relative to the standard of living enjoyed by other members of society. Even if basic needs are met, a segment of the population may still be considered “poor” if they possess fewer resources, opportunities or goods than other citizens. For example, if most families in a society can afford 2 cars and a family can afford only 1, they are considered relatively poor. Overall Poverty has various manifestations, including: • Lack of income and productive resources sufficient to ensure sustainable livelihoods; • Hunger and malnutrition; • Ill health; • Limited or lack of access to education and other basic services; • Increased morbidity and mortality from illness; • Homelessness and inadequate housing; • Unsafe environments; • Social discrimination and exclusion; • Lack of participation in decision-making and in civil, social and cultural rights.” Poverty defined as a lack of well-being is clearly multidimensional The standard of living, and therefore poverty, may be represented by a UNI-DIMENSIONAL indicator (e.g. income) or a MULTI-DIMENSIONAL approach (e.g. income, health conditions, family status, etc.). In the first case, poverty is defined by income poverty and the standard of living is defined in the space of economic welfare, a narrower concept than well-being. In the second case, the concept of poverty is closer to well-being, where other welfare indicators support income in defining poverty. The Summit recommended a two-pronged strategy to attack poverty: “National strategies to reduce overall poverty substantially, including measures to remove the structural barriers that prevent people from escaping poverty, with specific time-bound commitments to eradicate absolute poverty by a target date to be specified by each country in its national context. “ Perspectives on poverty Poverty can be defined in very precise technical terms that facilitate its measurement. Poverty can also be characterized in a more multidimensional – yet less precise – manner that helps see poverty in relation to its causes, its context, its consequences and the ways it is related to phenomena that can be influenced. The followings are examples of various approaches A. Income poverty refers to incomes below a “minimum subsistence” or 50% or 60% below the median. • The World Bank “absolute” poverty level is based on minimum incomes needed for basic necessities in a number of low-income developing countries. • In the European Union, relative poverty is defined as 60% of the median income. B. Basic needs approach: Poverty is scarcity of resources and opportunities to satisfy basic needs: • The ILO introduced the “basic needs” concept in the 1970s and 1980s. This concept allowed for taking into account the availability in the community of public goods and services when defining and assessing poverty. C. Capabilities approach: poverty and deprivation are a lack of prerequisites for self-determined life, “lack of capabilities” to manage one’s life. Capabilities are means for achieving good life, to avoid and escape from deprivations, and to realize one’s potential. Development is a widening of choices, development is freedom. Capabilities refer to both external resources and options and human capital embedded in the person her/himself. Prevention and reduction of poverty calls for expanding opportunities, empowerment and security, so as to enable people to manage their lives. The capabilities that enable people to avoid poverty, escape poverty and achieve their life goals are: economic, human, political, socio- cultural and protective capabilities. Gender and environment cut across these dimensions. D. Well-being approach: poverty is the flipside of well- being, it is bad life, it is ill-being. Poverty is seen as a multidimensional lack of resources and conditions to achieve satisfaction of physical, social and psychological or self-actualization needs. The Finnish sociologist Erik Allardt (in the 1970s) referred to these dimensions of well-being as ”Having”, “Loving” and “Being”. Well-being is a product – not a sum – of these components. More of one cannot replace scarcity of the others. The increasing Western wealth has already for decades failed to create more well-being and happiness. Poverty analyses have tended to fail to account for the social and psychological dimensions of poverty and deprivation as they are difficult to measure. Thus qualitative analyses are important to improve understanding of the essence and causes of and solutions to poverty and deprivation. In the case of children it is clear that some material standard of living is necessary– but not a sufficient condition for them to grow and develop. E. Inequality approach: poverty is a process. Its essential root causes are embedded in inequality, insecurity, vulnerability, discrimination and exclusion. Thus the ways to attack poverty are related to more equal opportunities, decent work, economic and social security, non-discrimination, empowerment and making social and economic institutions more fair and accountable. F. Human Rights Based Approach: Poverty is a violation of basic rights and fundamental freedoms. It is a multidimensional and comprehensive perspective. The human rights approach anchors the criteria for poverty and deprivation into the non-attainment of universally agreed, unalienable human rights standards and principles as the ultimate benchmark to be attained for all. However, norms and legislation alone are not enough to make rights materialize. Equality-oriented comprehensive social policy and good governance are the necessary instruments for creating enabling environments for people to avoid poverty and for moving out of poverty. The dynamic nature of poverty People fall in and move out of poverty Understanding poverty as a static state of affairs and the poor as a stable and restricted group of people is often misleading. Poverty is often very clearly seasonal. Poverty can result from normal life events when there is no social security. Qualitative studies such as the World Bank “Moving Out of Poverty” and the studies of the Chronic Poverty Centre, have shown how people fall into constant poverty as a result of quite common lifecycle events that turn terrible when there is no ways of managing even minor economic shocks. On the other hand, there is considerable flow out of poverty as people strive to escape poverty and many manage to do it. Social institutions are often the insurmountable obstacles that block the way. Example: Income of a family can fluctuate radically due to various shocks or even quite normal lifecycle events. When there are no “safety nets” or risk management systems, a single shock can push the family into a situation where it will rely on irreversible harmful coping strategies: selling productive assets (cattle, tools, land), borrowing money at excessive interest rates, taking children out of school etc. The latter means that the children have a high probability of falling into a disadvantaged position for their entire lifetime. Types of Poverty: Situational and Generational “Situational poverty” refers to people living in poverty for a short time as the result of circumstance (unemployment, chronic illness, disability, divorce, or death of a family member). There is no single path into or out of poverty; many events throw people into poverty and many events help people exit from poverty. Poverty is a fluid rather than static condition for most. “Trigger events” like changes in household composition, employment status, and disability status, are often the cause for entry to or exit from poverty. Employment is the most common event associated with poverty entry. Intergenerational transmission of poverty is common
Wealth and poverty have a high tendency to
transcend generations. In most country contexts, to be born in a poor family fate a child to a lifetime of poverty. In only a few countries do opportunities for social mobility effectively enable people to overcome this tendency. In the USA, Great Britain, France and Italy this mobility is low while in the Nordic countries, parents’ status has the least influence on the socioeconomic status of children. But, in Ethiopia,,,,, Poverty and Gender • Gender – Division of labor (Who does what in the household, family, and the society) – Access to resources (Who have access to household and community resources) – Decision making power (Who makes the decision in the household, in the family and the community)
• WID (Women in Development)
• GAD (Gender and Development) Remark Reducing poverty and eradicating extreme poverty are broadly accepted goals of development. However, most advanced and multidimensional perspectives on poverty lead to rethinking poverty, poverty projects, poverty reduction policies and strategies. Poverty is an end result of broader developments. And similarly, poverty reduction is only possible through transformative economic and social policies. There are also deliberate policy choices that sustain inequality and poverty. Poverty is not a choice of poor people. But their poverty can be a choice of the rich in power. (Ronald Wiman 15.08.2012)
Instant Access to (Ebook) Essentials of Research Methods: A Guide to Social Science Research by Janet M. Ruane ISBN 9780631230489, 0631230483, 0631230491 ebook Full Chapters