Reading and Writing Week 3 and 4
Reading and Writing Week 3 and 4
WEEK-3 & 4
ROSELYN E. LAZALITA, SUBJECT TEACHER
HOUSE RULES
• Be Polite.
• Keep your CP in your bag and put it in the silent
mode.
• Listen attentively to your teacher/classmate
whenever s/he talks.
• Be participative and cooperative.
REPORTING TIME
SET B • SET C
REVIEW
There are four common types of assertion enumerated
by Tiongson.
• 1. Statement of Fact
• 2. Statement of Opinion
• 3. Statement of Convention
• 4. Statement of Preference
• This is a statement that can be
proven objectively by direct
experiences, testimonies of
witnesses, verified observations, or
the results of research.
• Opinions are based on facts, but are
difficult to objectively verify because of
the uncertainty of producing
satisfactory proofs of soundness.
• A convention is a way in which something is
done, similar to traditions and norms.
Conventions depend on historical
precedent, laws, rules, usage, and customs.
• Preferences are based on personal choice;
therefore, they are subjective and cannot be
objectively proven or logically attacked.
LEARNING COMPETENCIES
• Formulate evaluate statements about a text
read:
Counterclaims in response to claims made
in text read (EN11/12RWS-IVac-9.2)
• Determine textual evidence to validate
assertions and counterclaims made about a
text read.
EN11/12RWS-IVac-10)
FORMULATING
COUNTERCLAIMS
LESSON 1
• To be an effective critical thinker, it is not
enough just to be able to identify claims and
assertions. It is also important to have the
ability to analyze an argument and
counterclaims.
• Counterclaims are claims made to rebut a
previous claim. They provide a contrasting
perspective to the main argument.
• Counterclaims, as defined by Tiongson (2016),
are “claims made to rebut a previous claim. This
point of view is in contrast to previous claims
made by the author.
• To present objectivity, the writer must be
aware of the counterclaims to his or her
claims. Considering the other side of the
argument may help you identify the
weaknesses and strengths of your claim,
giving you the leeway to open more details
to make the reader believe.
Tiongson gave the following questions that can
help you formulate a counterclaim:
• What are the major points on which you
and the author can disagree?
• What is their strongest argument? What
did they say to defend their position?
• What are the merits of their view?
Steps in Writing a Counterclaim
Step One – Ways to begin counterclaim
paragraphs
• Many people believe that . . .
• It is often thought that . . .
• It might seem as if . . .
• While it is common . . .
Step Two – Ways to transition from the opposite
side back to your opinion
• What this argument fails to consider is . . .
• This view sounds convincing at first but . . .
• Although the core claim is valid, it suffers from
the flaw in its . . .
• Step Three – Write a counterclaim. Use one
of the sentence starters in step one.
Remember to transition back to your
opinion. Use one of the sentences starters in
step two.
Counterclaim example:
is often thought that social studies is the
favorite academic class for junior high school
students. However, what this argument fails
to consider is that science allows for more
hands-on activities. For example, when
studying amphibians, you get to dissect a frog
rather than just read about an event from the
past.
ACTIVITY 1
Counterclaim:
Many people believe that hybrid cars are an
effective strategy to fight pollution. This view
sounds convincing at first but instead of focusing
on cars, which still encourages a culture of driving
even if it cuts down on pollution, the nation should
focus on building and encouraging the use of mass
transit systems.
• TEST-1 1. Claim: Tracking
devices on phones is
a good idea because
if you go somewhere
your parents will
know your
whereabouts.
Counterclaim:
2. Claim: Being
grounded is a good
idea depending on
what they did.
Counterclaim:
________________________
________________________
________________________
DETERMINING TEXTUAL
EVIDENCE
LESSON 2
What is textual evidence?
• Textual evidence is information gathered
from the text that supports your assertion
or counterclaim about the text. It refers to
any proof of an argument, a claim, a
counterclaim, an assertion cited in the text
leading to a conclusion.
In expressing your judgment about the text,
1. First, state your idea about the text.
2. To determine evidence from the text, look
for clues and keywords that support your
idea about the text.
3. Quote or paraphrase the part of the text
that helped you come up with your idea.
4. Use quotation marks to quote a part of
the text. If it is from a book, indicate the page
number at the end of your sentence.
5. Lastly, express how the quote supports
your idea.
In citing textual evidence, you need to quote,
paraphrase or refer to the very specific part
of the text where you can use to support
your own thoughts and ideas.
types of textual evidence:
• Referencing
This is the act of mentioning a specific section of
the text like an event or action.
Examples:
• According to Fussell, ‘The Oxford Book of English
Verse presides over the Great War in a way that
has never been fully appreciated’ (159).
• Strickland tells the story of Minty Nelson, a 27-
year-old Seattle University employee and student,
whose encounter with a census worker epitomizes
the identity battle faced constantly by multiracial
people.
Paraphrasing
This is restating an author’s or someone
else’s work using your own words without
losing the original idea of the text.
Example:
The original passage: The paraphrase:
• Students frequently overuse direct • In research papers students
quotation in taking notes; as a often quote excessively,
result they overuse quotations in failing to keep quoted
the final (research) paper. material down to a desirable
Probably only about 10% of your level. Since the problem
final manuscript should appear as usually originates during
directly quoted matter. Therefore, note taking. It is essential to
you should strive to limit the minimize the material
amount of exact transcribing of recorded verbatim (Lester,
source materials while taking 1976 p. 46 – 47)
notes (Lester, 1976 p. 46 – 47)
Summarizing : This is stating the essential ideas
together of the text in a shorter way.
The original passage: The summary: