EEM Unit-4
EEM Unit-4
Unit IV
Forms of Business Organization: Single trader, partnership and public limited
company.
• Organization is an organized group of people with a particular purpose, such as a business or government
policies.
• It is a group of people who work together.
• Organizations exist because people working together can achieve more than a person working alone.
Significance
• Organization is an important means of creating coordination and communication among various depts.
• Different jobs and positions are interrelated by structural relationship.
• It specifies the channel and mode of communication among different members.
Forms of organization
The various forms of organization are as follows:
1) Sole
proprietorship / single trader
2) Partnership
3) Co-operative Society
4) Joint stock company (Private and Public)
Forms of organization Contd…
• 2. Partnership contd…
• Partnership Deed
Since partnership rests on an agreement among persons, its formation
does not involve any special legal problems.
• Partnership agreement is not registered in the court of law, its a an
agreement between the partners whereas a partnership deed is a
written agreement between the partners and is registered in the court
of law.
• Partnership Deed lays down the terms and conditions of partnership
and the rights, duties and obligations of partners.
Forms of organization Contd…
• 2. Partnership contd…
• Partnership Deed contd…
• The following points are generally covered in the Deed:
• (i) The nature of business.
• (ii) Name of the firm and the place where its business will be carried on
• (iii) Amount of capital to be contributed by each partner.
• (iv) Duties, powers and obligations of all the partners.
• (v) Method of preparing accounts and arrangement for audit.
• (vi) Whether loans will be accepted from a partner over and above the capital also, if so, at what rate
of interest.
• (vii) The amount to be allowed as private drawings by each partner and the interest to be charged
thereon.
• (viii) The ratio in which profits are to be shared.
• (ix) Whether a partner can be expelled and, if so, the procedure for the same.
• (x) Method for the settlement of disputes.
Forms of organization Contd…
2. Partnership contd…
Registration of firm
• 2. Partnership contd…
• Merits of Partnership:
A partnership form of organization offers the following advantages:
• (i) Ease in formation: A partnership is very easy to form. All that is required is an agreement among
the partners. Even the expenses to be incurred for registration are-not much.
• (ii) Pooling of financial resources: A partnership commands more financial resources compared to
sole proprietorship. This helps in expanding business and earning more profits. As and when a firm
requires more money, more partners can be admitted.
• (iii) Pooling of managerial skills: A partnership facilitates pooling of managerial skills of all its
partners. This leads to greater efficiency in business operations. For instance, in a big partnership
firm, one partner can handle production function, another partner can look after all marketing activity,
still another can attend to legal and personnel problems, and so on.
• (iv) Balanced business decisions: In a partnership firm, decisions are taken unanimously after
considering all the major aspects of a problem. This ensures not only balanced business decisions but
also removes difficulties in the smooth implementation of those decisions.
• (v) Sharing of risks: Unlike sole proprietary organization, the risks of partnership business are shared
by partners on a predetermined basis. This encourages partners to undertake risky but profitable
business activities.
Forms of organization Contd…
• 2. Partnership contd…
• Limitations of Partnership:
A partnership form of organization suffers from the following major limitations:
• (i) Uncertainty of existence: The existence of a partnership firm is very uncertain. The retirement, death, bankruptcy or lunacy of
any partner can put an end to the partnership. Further, the partnership business can come to a close if any partner demands it.
• (ii) Risks of implied authority: It is true that like the sole proprietor each partner has unlimited liability. But his liability may arise
not only from his own acts but also from the acts and mistakes of co-partners over whom he has no control. This discourages many
persons with money and ability, to join a partnership firm as partner.
• (iii) Risks of disharmony: In partnership, since decisions are taken unanimously, it is essential that all partners reconcile their
views for the common good of the organization. But there may arise situations when some partners may adopt rigid attitudes and
make it impossible to arrive at a commonly agreed decision. Lack of harmony may paralyze the business and cause conflict and
mutual bickering.
• (iv) Difficulty in withdrawal from the firm: Investment in a partnership can be easily made but cannot be easily withdrawn. This
is so because the withdrawal of a partner’s share requires the consent of all other partners.
• (v) Lack of institutional confidence: A partnership business does not enjoy much confidence of banks and financial institutions. It
is because the nature of its activities is not disclosed at public and the agreement among partners is not regulated by any law. As a
result, large financial resources cannot be raised by partnership and growth of business cannot be ensured.
• (vi) Difficulties of expansion: It is difficult for a partnership firm to undertake modernization of expansion of its operations. This is
because of its inability to raise adequate funds for the purpose. Limited membership (restricted to 20) and their limited personal
resources do not permit large amounts of capital to be raised by the partners. Therefore, large-scale business cannot generally be
organized by partnerships.
Forms of organization Contd…
• Definitions
• Company is “an association of many persons who contribute money or
money’s worth to a common stock and employ it in some trade or
business, and who share the profit and loss (as the case may be)
arising therefrom.” —James Stephenson
• “A Joint Stock Company is a voluntary association of individuals for
profit, having a capital divided into transferable shares, the ownership
of which is the condition of membership.” —Prof. L.H. Haney
Forms of organization Contd…
• 3. Joint Stock Companies contd…
There are several types of companies. Their classifications can be made from many
ways.
In brief they are :
1. According to Incorporation
2. According to Liability
3. According to Number of Members
• Line Organization
• Line and Staff Organization
• Functional Organization
• Project Organization
• Matrix Organization:
Line Organisation
• It is the simplest and oldest form of
organization structure.
• It is called as military or departmental or
scalar type of organization. Under this
system, authority flows directly and
vertically from the top of the managerial
hierarchy ‘down to different levels of
managers and subordinates and down to
the operative level of workers.
• Line organization clearly identifies
authority, responsibility and
accountability at each level. The persons
in Line organization are directly involved
in achieving the objectives of the
organization.
Advantages of Line Organization
a. The line organization structure is very simple to understand and simple to operate.
b. Communication is fast and easy. And feedback can be taken quickly.
c. Responsibility is fixed and unified at each level and accountability are clear-cut, hence each individual knows to whom he
is responsible and who is responsible to him.
d. It is especially useful when the company is small in size, and it provides for greater control and discipline in the
organization.
e. It makes rapid decisions and effective coordination possible. So it is economic and effective.
f. The people in line type of organization get to know each other better and tend to feel close to each other.
g. The system is capable of adjusting itself to changing conditions for the simple reason that each executive has sole
responsibility in his own sphere
Disadvantages of Line Organization
. It is a rigid and inflexible form of organization.
h. There is a tendency for line authority to become dictatorial.
i. It overloads the executive with pressing activities so that long-range planning and policy formulation are often neglected
j. There is no provision for specialists and specialization, which is essential for growth and optimization.
k. Different departments may be much interested in their self-interests, rather than overall organizational interests and
welfare. It is likely to encourage nepotism.
l. It does not provide any means by which a good worker may be rewarded and a bad one punished.
Line and Staff Organization
• In the line and staff organization, staffs
assist the line managers in their duties in
order to achieve the high performance.
• So, in an organization which has the
production of textiles, the production
manger, marketing manager and the
finance manager may be treated as line
executives, and the department headed
by them may be called line departments
On the other hand, the personnel
manager who deal with the recruitment,
training and placement of workers, the
quality control manager who ensure the
quality of products and the public
relations manager are the executives who
perform staff functions.
Advantages of Line and Staff Organization:
a. Line officers can concentrate mainly on the doing function as the work of planning and
investigation is performed by the staff. Specialization provides for experts advice and
efficiency in management.
b. Since the organization comprises line and staff functions, decisions can be taken easily.
c. The staff officers supply complete factual data to the line officers covering activity
within and without their own units. This will help in greater co-ordination.
d. It provides an adequate opportunity for the advancement of workers
e. The staff services provide a training for the different positions.
f. Adequate organization, a balance among the various activities can be attained easily.
g. The system is flexible for new activities may be undertaken by the staff without
forcing early adjustments of line arrangements.
h. Staff specialists are conceptually oriented towards looking ahead and have the time to
do program and strategic planning and analyze the possible effects of expected future
events.
Disadvantages of Line and Staff Organization:
a. Confusion and conflict may arise between line and staff. Because the allocation of authority and responsibility is
not clear and members of the lower levels may be confused by various line orders and staff advices.
b. Staff generally advise to the lines, but line decides and acts. Therefore, the staffs often feel powerless.
c. Too much reliance on staff officers may not be beneficial to the business because line officials may lose much of
their judgment and imitative.
d. Normally, staff employees have specialized knowledge and expert. Line makes the final decisions, even though
staff give their suggestions.
e. Staff officers are much educated so their ideas may be more theoretical and academic rather than practical.
f. Although expert advice is available it reaches the workers through the managers. Here it is liable to create a greater
deal of misunderstanding as the interpretation may differ.
g. The staff are unable to carry out its plan or recommendations because of lack of authority. So, they become
ineffective sometimes, it will make them careless and indifferent towards their jobs.
h. Since the line is performed, with the advice provided by the staff, if things go right then the staff takes the
credit and if things go wrong then the line get the blame for it.
Functional Organization :
Features
a. Each worker receives instructions not only from one superior, but
also from a group of specialists.
b. Three types of authority relationships are in the functional
organization such as line authority, staff authority and functional
authority.
c. Staff specialists are given the authority to decide and do things in a
limited way.
d. The scope of the work is kept limited but the area of authority is left
unlimited.
e. There is a grouping of activities of the enterprise into certain major
functional departments
Advantages of Functional Organisation
• Each manager is an expert in his field. He has to perform a limited number
of functions. So, complete specialization exists in functional organisation.
• The greater degree of specialization leads to improvement in the quality of
product.
• Since the job requirements are definite and tangible, organization can
achieve the intensive utilization of the principle of specialization of labour
at the managerial level.
• Specialization will lead for mass production and standardization.
• Since experts get sufficient time for creative thinking, planning and
supervision are made efficient.
• It increases the work satisfaction for specialists who presumably do what
they like to do.
Disadvantages of Functional Organization:
a. Since there is no direct boss or controller of the workers, co-ordination is hard to achieve.
b. Since workers are under different bosses, discipline is hard to achieve. As results there will be
low morale on the part of the workers.
c. The non-supervisory employees are uncertain as to whom they should turn for advice and aid
when problem requires analysis.
d. As control is divided, action cannot be taken immediately.
e. Since there will be many foreman of equal rank in the same department, the conflicts of
leadership may arise.
f. It reduces the opportunities for the training of all-round executives to assume further leadership
in the firm.
Project Organization:
• This organizational structure are temporarily formed for specific
projects for a specific period of time, for the project of achieving the
goal of developing new product, the specialists from different
functional departments such as production, engineering, quality
control, marketing research etc., will be drawn to work together. These
specialists go back to their respective duties as soon as the project is
completed.
• The project organization is set-up with the object of overcoming the
major weakness of the functional organization, such as absence of
unity of command, delay in decision-making, and lack of
coordination.
Advantages of Project Organization:
Power comes from knowledge and expertise. Authority comes from position and office.
Power is the personal ability of a person to control or influence Authority is the formal right to take decisions or making
others. commands.
Power does not come with rank or designation; a person is either Authority comes with rank and designation.
powerful or not.
The scope of power cannot be written down or explained because The scope of authority can be written down and explained in
it is too broad a concept. explicit terms.
Power is not dependant on levels as it is broader in context and Authority is dependent on levels or positions and can be used in
has a more extensive approach. a limited manner as awarded.
Delegation
1.Estimation of results
2. Assignment of duties
3. Create authority
4. Create accountability
5. Process of delegation of authority
6. Assignment
7.Transfer
8. Acceptance
9. Accountability
Decentralization
• Decentralization is the process of distributing or dispersing functions,
powers, people or things away from a central location. The meaning of
decentralization may vary in part because of the different ways it is
applied.
• Concepts of decentralization have been applied to group dynamics and
management science in private businesses and organizations, political
science, law and public administration, economics and technology.
• Transfer of decision-making power and assignment of accountability
and responsibility for results.
• It is accompanied by delegation of commensurate authority to
individuals or units at all levels of an organization even those far
removed from headquarters or other centers of power.
Objectives of Decentralization
The following are the main objectives which a decentralized system of
organization seeks to achieve.
• To relieve the burden of work on the chief executive
• To develop the managerial faculties
• To satisfy lower level of workers and motivate them
• To take quick and appropriate decision on the sport at the level which
it is really required with a view of cash on the opportunity available
• To reduce the communication work and fill the gap in communication,
if there any
Decentralization contd…
Advantages
1. Distribution of burden of top executive—De centralization enables to its executive to share his burden
with others at lower levels because here authority is delegated. The top executive is relieved of some
burden and concentrates his activities to think for the future of the organization.
2. Increased motivation and morale .The morality of the employees are increased because of delegation
of authority. De centralization helps to increase employee's morale because it involves delegation. The
employees are motivated to work
3. Greater efficiency and output: Decentralization gives emphasis on care, caution and enthusiastic
approach to the work which in turn results in increased efficiency and output. This is possible because it
involves delegation of authority and responsibility.
4. Diversification of Activities—De centralization helps in diversification of activities. It crests more
employment opportunities because new managers are to be entrusted with new assignments
5. Better Co-ordination—The various operations and activities are coordinated in a decentralized set up.
6. Maintenance of Secrecy — Decentralization enables to maintain secrecy without much cost and
unnecessary trouble.
7. Facilitate effective control and quick decision-De-centralisation enables to measure the work
according to standard easily and quickly. This facilitate taking up quick decision.
Decentralization contd…
Disadvantages
• Not withstanding the merits of decentralization, there are certain difficulties in its application to all cases and in all
circumstances The serious limitations of decentralization are as follows:
• 1. Decentralization makes the utilization of the services of exceptionally talented people difficult. Because of weak financial
resources, appointment of such persons may not be possible.
• 2. Decentralization increases the problems of coordination among the various units.
• 3. In some cases, decentralization may not be possible at all. External factors make this difficult, such as company wide
strikes.
• 4. It increases the administrative expenses because highly-paid managers have to be appointed.
• 5. High Cost of Operation: Establishing of various departments and employment of specialists in each department will result
in a higher cost of operation.
• 6. Lack of Uniformity: There shall not be uniformity in policies and actions, since each manager will form his own genius in
designing them.
• 7. Unsuitable for Small Firms: Departmentalization is completely unsuitable for small firms as it involves high operating
costs.
• 8. Reliance on the Manager: Decentralized organization has to place undue reliance on the efficiency of the divisional
managers. If they do not have enough skill or competence to take appropriate decisions, the enterprise has to incur heavy
losses due to their faulty decisions.
• 9. Self Centered Attitude: Each department will tend to be self centered ignoring the broader interests of other departments
and that of the entire firm.
Difference between delegation & decentralization
• 1. Responsibility: In delegation, a superior delegates or transfers some rights and duties to a subordinate but his
responsibility in respect of that work does not end. On the other hand, decentralization relieves him from
responsibility and the subordinate becomes liable for that work.
2. Process: Delegation is process while de-centralization is
the end result of a deliberate policy of making delegation of authority to the lowest levels in managerial
hierarchy. 3. Need. Delegation is almost essential
for the management to get things done in the organization i.e., delegating requisite authority for performance of
work assigned. De-centralization may or may not be practiced as a systematic policy in the organization
• 4.Control: In delegation the final control over the activities of organization lies with the top executive while in
decentralization the power of control is exercised by the unit head to which the authority has been delegated.
• 5. Authority: Delegation represents selecting dispersal of authority whereas decentralization signifies the
creation of autonomous and self-sufficient units or divisions.
6. Scope: Delegation hardly poses any problem of co- ordination to the
delegator of authority.
While de-centralization poses a great problem in this regard since extreme freedom of action is given to the
people by creating self-sufficient or autonomous units.
7 .Good Results: De-centralization is effective only in big organizations whereas delegation is required and
gives good results in all types of organizations irrespective of their size.
8. Nature: Delegation is the result of human limitation to the
span of management. De-centralization is the other hand, is the result of the big size and multifarious functions
of the enterprise.
Line and Staff Authority
Line authority
• It is that authority which a superior exercises over his
subordinates to accomplish primary objectives of the
organization.
• The superior issues orders and instructions to his sub
ordinates to complete the tasks.
• This authority is delegated to those positions or elements of
the organization which have direct responsibility for
accomplishing the primary enterprise objectives.
• The flow of authority is always in the downward direction
from the superior to the subordinate and such relationship is
called LINE RELATIONSHIP that exists in all departments
of an organization
• Line relationship helps the organization to work properly
by
• Providing the decisions required for functioning.
• Furnishing reference points for the approval of proposals.
• Serving as a means of control by setting the limits of
authority.
• Establishing authentic communication channels to make
leadership process effective.
• Line and Staff Authority Relationship
• ROLES OF THE LINE RELATIONSHIP:
• 1. As a Chain of Command: Line officials are in the chain
of command from the highest position to the lowest
position in the organization. Each successive manager
exercises command over his subordinates.
• 2. As a career of accountability: Each executive in the line
is accountable for the proper performance of the tasks
assigned to him and every subordinate is answerable to
his superior.
• 3. As a Channel of communication: Since the line
relationship involves issue of instructions from the
authorities and reporting from subordinates, it facilitates
and serves as an effective channel of communication.
Staff Authority
• In the context of management, it implies to those elements that help
the line authorities to function effectively in accomplishing the
primary objectives of the enterprise.
• Staff authority provides
• advice
• assistance and
• information to line managers and they are distinguished into three
categories namely, personal, specialized and general staff.
• They reduce the burden of line authorities and they too have the right
to command and extract work from their subordinates.
Line and Staff Authority Conflicts
• As always, functional and decisional conflicts arise between line and staff members. The causes may be
attributed to the following reasons.
• 1. Line managers grudge against the staff personnel:
• a) The staff authorities try to encroach upon the line managers and tell them how to do their work.
• b) Lack of well balanced advice from the staff managers.
• c) Staff managers are not directly accountable and sport a jealous attitude towards line authorities.
• d) Staff managers fail to see the big picture objectively and their interests are confined to specified situations.
• e) Staff often tend to impose their superiority on line managers.
• 2. Staff personnel complaints against the line managers
• a) Line managers don’t want to listen to the suggestions of the staff and make it a point to resist new ideas.
• b) Lack of authority on the part of staff managers to implement their innovative ideas and hence the
dependence on line authorities.
• c) Line managers do not utilize the services of staff personnel properly and effectively.
• 3. The workers’ attitude
• a) The authority relationships between line and staff specialists are not clearly defined most of the time
• b) The basic difference in attitude and perception of the line and staff managers create difficulties for the work
force in carrying out orders and instructions.