System Changeover Four Possible Approaches
System Changeover Four Possible Approaches
The implementation of the new system occurs when the old system is replaced by the
new one. This is the process of putting the new system into physical operation.
There are four ways of implementing a new system..
When a new ICT system has been tested thoroughly by the programmers then it is
ready is be implemented into the working environment, replacing the original system.
There are four strategies that can be used to do this: direct; phased; pilot or parallel
running
-:
Direct implementation:
1
With this strategy, the changeover is done in one operation, completely replacing the
old system in one go. This usually takes place on a set date, often after a break in
production or a holiday period so that time can be used to get the hardware and
software for the new system installed without causing too much disruption.
Advantages:
o The most rapid of all the strategies, provided it works!
o Less risk of confusion between old and new systems.
Disadvantages:
o Most stressful for the users - the old system has gone so there is no
going back if they have difficulties.
o Most difficult to train staff on as the new system was not in place
to
learn on before the change over.
o Most stressful for the developers - all the data and files from the old
system will have to be converted ready for use on the new one.
o Most risky - if the new system does not work properly then there is
nothing to fall back on.
2
With this strategy, the old and the new system are both used alongside each other,
both being able to operate independently. If all goes well, the old system is stopped
and new system carries on as the only system.
Advantages:
o If there are initial problems with the new system then the old one can
still be used.
o Both systems can easily be compared.
o Easy to train staff by letting them learn new skills on the parallel
system.
o Easy to evaluate because the new and old systems are both
running.
Disadvantages:
o Expensive - both systems are being run as fully operating versions so
both are doing the same job. This may mean duplication of staff and
hardware.
o Some risk - there is a greater chance of confusion or errors if the two
different systems are being run side-by-side.
Pilot implementation:
With this strategy, the new system replaces the old one in one operation but only on a
small scale. For example it might be tried out in one branch of the company or in one
3
location. If successful then the pilot is extended until it eventually replaces the old
system completely.
Advantages:
o Easy to control, the pilot can be halted at any time.
o Easy to evaluate because the new and old systems are both running.
o Low risk, if a small-scale pilot fails then not too much has been
lost.
o Easy to train staff by letting them learn new skills on the pilot
system.
Disadvantages:
o It can be slow to get a pilot to completely replace the old system.
o A pilot may not show up problems that a full-scale implementation
would. This is because a system can work well as a small-scale pilot
but has difficulties when it is scaled up to a full operating system with
more realistic volumes of data to be processed.
Phased implementation:
With this strategy, the new brought in in stages (phases). If each phase is successful
then the next phase is started, eventually leading to the final phase when the new
system fully replaces the old one.
Advantages:
o Very structured, each phase can be fully evaluated before moving onto
the next one.
o Lower risk, a well planned and controlled introduction of the new
system.
4
o Easy to train staff by letting them learn new skills on each phase as it is
introduced.
Disadvantages:
o Slower than direct implementation.
o Although each phase is easy to evaluate, you have to wait until all the
phases are complete before you can evaluate the whole change over.
Recommendation
From the above discussion about all four possible approaches, it is very clear that data
cutover and parallel operation approach alone is not suitable for the CHIS because of
drawbacks like high risk or high cost but the combination of both approaches namely
pilot operation and phased operation approaches is more fruitful.
Still phased operation is not most suitable approach as we know there are lot of
phases involve in our information system and also lack of fund is there. So conclusion
is pilot operation is the most recommended approach for the CHIS because this
method is cheaper and safer method. Any one of the health centre can implement the
new system and after the system proves successful, it will be used by other health
centres by using direct cutover. In this way it will be implemented under budget and
also there will be low risk of system failure.