Most-Probable-Number (MPN) Method
Most-Probable-Number (MPN) Method
(MPN) Method
❖ Principle:
● The most probable number is a method used to determine the viable count of bacteria in a sample,
where other viable count methods are difficult to perform.
● The precision and accuracy of the MPN Method is less than that of the Membrane Filtration method or
the Plate-Count Method.
● This method is particularly useful for samples which contain low concentrations of bacterial cells; for
example, non sterile pharmaceutical products (Like viable count methods), in addition to raw materials
in the pharmaceutical industry, milk, water, etc.
● MPN relies on a statistical method based on probability theory. According to the USP, there are
statistical tables designed to find MPN values for a sample. These tables show the results at 95%
confidence limits ( بكون متاكد من صحة النتائج% 95 )بنسبة.
● Unreliable results are obtained particularly for the enumeration of molds. For these reasons, the MPN
Method is reserved for the enumeration of TAMC (Total Aerobic Microbial Count).
❖ Procedures (According to USP):
1- Prepare a series of three serial 10-fold dilutions from the sample solution provided using the provided
sterile pipettes, saline, and empty sterile tubes.
2- From each level of dilution, three aliquots of 1 mL are used to inoculate three tubes
with 9 mL of the provided Soybean–Casein Digest Broth.
3- Incubate all tubes at 30° to 35° for not more than 3 days.
•If reading of the results is difficult or uncertain owing to the nature of the product to
be examined, subculture in the same broth or in Soybean–Casein Digest Agar for 1 to
2 days at the same temperature, and use these results.
From USP Table, determine the most probable number of microorganisms per g or
mL of the product to be examined.
Example: (Please explain this example in the section)
You are a pharmacist working in the quality control of industrial
pharmaceutical company. You performed the MPN for a cream
using 1 g from it after dissolving in the suitable solvent. Later,
you obtained the following result: