John Stuart Mill was a prominent British philosopher who made important contributions to utilitarianism and liberalism. He argued that actions should be judged based on whether they promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. For Mill, happiness was found not just in individual pleasure but also in living a morally good life and helping others. He advocated for unlimited freedom of thought and expression as well as equal rights and opportunities for women. Mill believed that through education and an ethic of caring for human welfare, societies could progress toward eliminating poverty, oppression, and unnecessary suffering.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
22 views
13 Lecture
John Stuart Mill was a prominent British philosopher who made important contributions to utilitarianism and liberalism. He argued that actions should be judged based on whether they promote the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. For Mill, happiness was found not just in individual pleasure but also in living a morally good life and helping others. He advocated for unlimited freedom of thought and expression as well as equal rights and opportunities for women. Mill believed that through education and an ethic of caring for human welfare, societies could progress toward eliminating poverty, oppression, and unnecessary suffering.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 15
moral philosophy
The Utilitarians. John Stuart Mill Context
• Education • Human liberty • Womens rights moral philosophy
• Mill agreed that helping others
gives us pleasure because helping others includes the quality of altruism, or the unselfish concern for the welfare of others. • For Mill, altruism emphasizes the Golden Rule: Treat others as you would have them treat you. The utilitarian morality does recognize in human beings the power of sacrificing their own greatest good for the good of others. . . . The happiness which forms the utilitarian standard of what is right in conduct, is not the agent’s own happiness, but that of all concerned. As between his own happiness and that of others, utilitarianism requires him to be as strictly impartial as a disinterested and benevolent spectator. In the golden rule of Jesus of Nazareth, we read the complete spirit of the ethics of utility. To do as you would be done by, and to love your neighbour as yourself, constitute the ideal perfection of utilitarian morality. Mill argued that our desire to be in unity with our fellow creatures helps civilizations make progress. Granting that each of us has a right to happiness, when we act altruistically, we want the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Education For Mill, education is particularly important. Education teaches the skills that we need to live healthy and dignified lives. He believed that, with education, citizens of goodwill could eliminate poverty and lessen disease. People of “fortunate means” would find more happiness in helping the less fortunate than they would find in selfishly “caring for nobody but themselves. Mill wrote, “When people who are tolerably fortunate in their outward lot do not find in life sufficient enjoyment to make it valuable to them, the cause generally is, caring for nobody but themselves. To those who have neither public nor private affections, the excitements of life are much curtailed, and in any case dwindle in value as the time approaches when all selfish interests must be terminated by death: while those who leave after them objects of personal affection, and especially those who have also cultivated a fellow-feeling with the collective interests of mankind, retain as lively an interest in life on the eve of death as in the vigour of youth and health. This is why the utilitarian will not be selfish. ” Human Liberty
For Mill, we must have unlimited freedom of expression.
Practicing the principle of the greatest good for the greatest number, he thought citizens should be free to criticize their government, to choose their own lifestyle, and to worship as they please. Human liberty. It comprises, first the inward domain of consciousness; demanding liberty of conscience in the most comprehensive sense; liberty of thought and feeling; absolute freedom of opinion and sentiment on all subjects, practical or speculative, scientific, moral, or theological. . . . Secondly, the principle requires liberty of tastes and pursuits; of framing the plan of our life to suit our own character; of doing as we like, subject to such consequences as may follow: without impediment from our fellow creatures, so long as what we do does not harm them, even though they should think our conduct foolish, perverse, or wrong. • Mill argued that we must be free to express our thoughts.
• If we never challenge the opinions of others, including
governments and religious institutions, we allow ourselves to depend upon someone else’s authority. When that happens, the public tends toward conformity. Mill was a passionate defender of women’s rights, and he believed both sexes should be involved in the political process. Together, he and Harriet Taylor questioned the English law of their day that proscribed that all women should marry but that no married woman could have property. All property, including her children, belonged to her husband. If a woman’s husband died, she could not become the legal guardian of their children unless he requested it in his will. If the woman left her husband for any reason, she could take nothing with her, not even her children. If necessary, her husband could force her to return. Because women were thought to lack intelligence, they could neither vote nor run for Parliament. Looked on as lesser beings than men, women were taught that virtue meant submission and meekness to their male “superiors.” Men considered women best suited for domestic jobs. Mill and Taylor argued that women should have: independence, freedom to make their own choices, freedom to get a good education. Society should view women as individuals in their own right, not existing as only relative to men, and men should stop defining the nature of women to women.