Poverty 1
Poverty 1
POVERTY
DEFINITION OF TERMS
Is an income level below some minimum level necessary to meet basic
needs. This minimum level is usually called the “poverty line”. What is
necessary to satisfy basic needs varies across time and societies.
Therefore, poverty lines vary in time and place, and each country uses lines
which are appropriate to its level of development, societal norms and values.
Historically, poverty has been related to income,
which remains at the core of the concept today.
o Food Poverty
o Transient poverty
o Chronic poverty
o Resource/Capabilities Poverty
• Relative Deprivation is another aspect of poverty.
Every person needs money for basic needs i.e. food, clothing and shelter.
However, people also need other "necessities"- items and activities to lead
a life, that is considered the norm.
• When a person is unable to afford an item such as a warm coat or new
clothes, they are experiencing relative deprivation.
• Combined Income-Deprivation Measure:
This is a combination of having a lower than average income and being
unable to buy necessities such as new clothes.
• Education
• Health service
• Housing
• Household&family relations
• AIDS kills adults in the prime of their working and parenting lives,
decimates the work force, fractures and impoverishes families, orphans
millions...
Food and education
•Affordable, secure food supplies are vital.
•Malnutrition causes severe health problems, and
can also affect education.
•Without education it is difficult to escape from poverty.
• This becomes a vicious circle – people who
live in poverty cannot afford to send their
children to school.
• Gender
• When we measure poverty we find differences between the level
experienced by men or boys, and women or girls.
• Women may be disadvantaged through lack of
access to education; in some countries they are
not allowed to own or inherit land; they are less
well paid than men.
• Environment
A child born in an industrialised country will add more to pollution over his
or her lifetime than 30-50 children born in the Third World.
• However, 3 rd
World child is likely to experience the
consequences of pollution in a much more devastating way.
• For example, annual carbon dioxide emissions have quadrupled in the
last 50 years.
• .
Major causes of poverty in Africa.
Insufficient Fiscal and monetary policies which do not promote
economic growth.
Economic:
Social:
Demographic:
Vulnerability:
Economic:
well-being such
as;
quality and access to education,
health,
physical insecurity,
The min values of indicators of social welfare are identified, and people
getting less of needs than minimum amounts are considered poor.
Monetary indicators
-
• PV lines, if not well-determined and adjusted to
local situations, may not reflect the actual std
of living.
Measuring Absolute poverty using
Monetary indicators
• Definition:
• Simply measures the proportion of the population/HH that is counted as
poor.
Np
• P0= N
• where Np is the number of poor and N is the total population (or sample).
• If 60 people are poor in a survey that samples 300 people, then P0 = 60/300 =
0.2 = 20%.
The headcount index is the proportion of the population for whom
consumption (or other measures of living standard) is less than the
poverty line.
1 q
Formula P 0= I ( yi z)
N i 1
• Where;
• I(.) is an indicator function that takes on a value of 1 if the bracketed
expression is true, and 0
• otherwise.
• So if expenditure (yi) is less than the poverty line (z), then I(.) equals to 1 and
the household would be counted as poor.
• Np is the total number of the poor.
• Advantage;
simple to construct
easy to understand.
• Useful in testing the effectiveness of the policies for poverty alleviation by
finding the changes in the numbers or % of people or HHs below PV line
• Disadvantages
Definition:
The poverty gap is the average, over all people, of the gaps between poor
people’s living standards and the poverty line.
• It indicates the average extent to which individuals fall below the
poverty line (if they do).
• The poverty gap index expresses the poverty gap as a percentage of
the poverty line.
Measures the extent to which individuals fall below the poverty line (the poverty
gaps) as a proportion of the poverty line.
The sum of these poverty gaps gives the minimum cost of eliminating
poverty, if transfers were perfectly targeted.
The measure does not reflect changes in inequality among the poor.
• Formal Definition:
The poverty gap (PG) is defined as average difference between poor
households’ expenditure and the poverty line.
The gap is considered to be zero for everyone else.
-Using the same notation as before,
N
1 Gi
Formula PG=
( )
N i 1 z
• Advantages
The PG can be interpreted as the average shortfall of poor people.
They show how much would have to be transferred to the poor to bring their
expenditure up to the poverty line, and present it as an average (PG)
The PG are the “minimum” cost for eliminating poverty with transfers
(the cost to eliminate poverty with perfect targeting of the poor and no
targeting costs or distortion effects)
The poverty gap has the virtue that it does not imply that there is a
discontinuity (“jump”) at the poverty line.
• Disadvantage
The PG do not capture differences in the severity of poverty amongst the
poor and ignore “inequality among the poor”.
• Example (poverty line = 125).
• A and B have the same PG and PGI, although it can be argued that
poverty is worse in B, because of an extremely poor member.
People whose incomes are less than the above income are taken to be
poor.
b. Comparing income with a predetermined % of the mean income
The mean income of a population is determined
The % (say 40%, 50% or 75%) of the above mean reflecting is
estimated.
People whose income are less than the % are taken to be poor
• Advantages of using relative poverty approach
Measures of absolute poverty useful information on the degree of
inequality since they compare incomes of all members of a population.
• Relative poverty approach is politically and socially appealing since is
considered in the whole society and data obtained are worth using in
promoting community-based development
Disadvantages
Do not reflect the well being of those who are poor; a relatively poor
person may be very rich in absolute terms and vice versa.
• Both rich and poor countries and people are relatively poor.
• Inequality is very high in the world, for example the average income of the
richest 20 countries is 37 times the average income of the poorest 20%
countries in the world(Worl Bank, 2000:3).
•
• In the year 2000, the world had 6,067million people (that is 6.067 billion) and
about 1.2 billion, which is 20% of them were poor living on less than US$ 1
per capita per day.
• They were distributed as follows:
Region # of the poor in Billions Percent
South Asia 0.52 43.5
Sub-Saharah Africa 0.29 24.3
East Asia Pacific 0.28 23.2
Latin America & Caribbean 0.08 6.5
Europe and Central Asia 0.02 2.0
Middle East and North Africa 0.01 0.5
TOTAL 1.20 100.0
Feminization of Poverty
• Is an idea that dates back to the 1970s. It was popularized at the start
of the 1990s, not least in research by United Nation agencies.
• The concept has various meanings, some of
which are not entirely consistent with its implicit
notion of change.
Definition
On average, women are paid 30-40% less than men for comparable
work
• Half a million women die unnecessarily from pregnancy-related
complications each year, the causes exacerbate by issue of poverty and
remoteness.
Access to land
• Land remains the most productive resource for the livelihood
of rural poor populations in the majority of developing
countries.
• More poverty is found in rural areas than in urban areas. For instance in
Tanzania, the rural poor are about 60% while the urban are about 39%.
• This is due to the following reasons why rural people tend to be poor:
Poor social services like education, health, water and sanitation.
Fewer employment opportunities
Shortage of capital investment for agriculture which is their main
economic activity.
Poor infrastructure, notably rural roads which increases transport
costs and cause other various difficulties in accessing markets for rural
people’s products
High prices of goods from town and low prices
of agricultural products results into unequal
exchange, thereby impoverish rural people.
• Vulnerability to micro-economic shocks and
plans, such as taxation and transitory food
security hits harder rural people than urban ones.