0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views

4 - Semantics

Semantics is the study of linguistic meaning at the level of words, phrases, and sentences. It involves three main areas: sense, reference, and truth conditions. Sense refers to the meaning of linguistic expressions, including issues like ambiguity, hyponymy, synonymy, and antonymy. Reference involves what objects in the world linguistic expressions refer to, such as referents, extensions, prototypes, and coreference. Truth conditions determine whether statements are true or false based on real-world situations.

Uploaded by

irishbaya20
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
35 views

4 - Semantics

Semantics is the study of linguistic meaning at the level of words, phrases, and sentences. It involves three main areas: sense, reference, and truth conditions. Sense refers to the meaning of linguistic expressions, including issues like ambiguity, hyponymy, synonymy, and antonymy. Reference involves what objects in the world linguistic expressions refer to, such as referents, extensions, prototypes, and coreference. Truth conditions determine whether statements are true or false based on real-world situations.

Uploaded by

irishbaya20
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 46

SEMANTICS

The study of linguistic meaning: that is, the


meaning of words, phrases, and sentences.
 Semantics is part of grammar proper
Points in  No one comprehensive and authoritative
Semantics theory of linguistic meaning.
 The word fly has more than one meaning
in English. The word moth does not.
 The word hide can mean the same thing as
conceal.
Points in  The meaning of the word fear includes the
meaning of the word emotion, but not vice
Semantics versa.
 The words sister and niece seem to be
closer in meaning that the words sister
and girl.
 In the sentence Jimmy Carter was the 39th
president of the United States, the phrases
Jimmy Carter and the 39th president of the
United States refer to the same person.
Points in The phrases, however, don’t mean the
Semantics same thing.
 In the sentence Monica believes that she is
a genius, she can refer either to Monica or
someone else.
 If someone were to ask you to name a
bird, you would probably think of a robin
before you would think of an ostrich.
 The sentences A colorless gas is blue and
Points in Oxygen is blue are both false, but for
Semantics different reasons.
 The sentences John’s wife is six feet tall is
neither true nor false, if John does not
have a wife.
BACKGROUND
 Used to characterize the SENSE of words.
 This method represents the sense of a word
in terms of semantic features.
SENSE Man Woman Boy Girl
Lexical
Decomposition Adult + + - -
Male + - + -
Man Woman Boy Girl Stallion Mare colt filly
Adult + + - - + + - -
Male + - + - + - + -
Human + + + + - - - -

• This method allows us, at least in principle, to characterize the senses of


a potentially infinite set of words with a finite number of semantic
features.

• Lexical decomposition in terms of semantic features provide a useful,


but somewhat limited, account of the meaning of words.
 Contains a group of words which are related
in their meaning
Exercise: Identify the word that does not
belong to the group and suggest a suitable
semantic field for the group.
SENSE  banana, apple, orange, apricot, flower
Semantic Field  Uncle, aunt, friend, grandmother, cousin
 Car, ship, plane, lake, boat
 Honesty, reliability, generosity, truthfulness
 Running, swimming, thinking, skating
REFERENCE
Study of - Is the study of what objects are referred to by
linguistic expressions.
REFERENCE
and
 Ex. Washington DC is the capital of United
TRUTH States
CONDITIONS  Washington DC and the expression the capital
of United States refer to the same entity.
TRUTH CONDITIONS
Study of - Is the study of conditions under which a
statement can be judged true or false.
REFERENCE
and  Ex. If the sentence
TRUTH Fred is 80 years old is true,
CONDITIONS  then the sentence
Fred is over 50 years old is necessarily true.
Three Areas:
Sense
Reference
SEMANTICS Truth
SENSE
The study of sense (meaning) can be divided
into two areas: speaker-sense and linguistic-
sense.

Speaker-sense is the speaker’s intention in


producing some linguistic expression. This is
SENSE outside the domains of semantics.
Ex. Fred is a real genius. (sarcastically)
Linguistic-sense is the meaning of a linguistic
expression as a part of language.
Fred is a real genius. (literally)
LEXICAL AMBIGUITY
 A word is lexically ambiguous if it has more than
one sense
 Fly – a noun (an insect, a zipper on a pair of pants,
SENSE or a baseball hit into the air with a bat) and a
verb.
But not all cases of ambiguity are lexical
Ex. American history teacher
 A teacher of American history
 A history teacher who is American.
 Syntactic ambiguity
HYPONYMY
 A word that contains the meaning of a more
general word known as the superordinate.

SENSE  Oak contains the meaning of tree


 Oak is a hyponym of the superordinate tree
HYPONYMY
 Hence, a hyponym is a word whose meaning
contains all the same feature values of
another word, plus some additional feature
SENSE values.
Ex.
 The meaning of the word sow has exactly
the same feature values as the word pig
(e.g., [-human]) plus some additional feature
values (e.g., [+adult], [-male])
SYNONYMY
 Two words are synonymous if they have the
same sense; that is if they have the same
values for all of their semantic features.
SENSE Ex. Big and large

 However, no words mean exactly the same


thing in all contexts.
 My big sister; My large sister.
SYNONYMY
 Synonymity does not capture differences in
connotations, or the associations the
speaker have with the word.
SENSE Ex.: Sanitation Engineer and Garbage Collector

 Synonymous words may also differ in


register or level of formality.
Ex.: A guy walks into a bar vs. A man walks into a bar
ANTONYMY

 GROUPS OF ANTONYMS
 Binary antonym
SENSE  Gradable antonym
 Converse antonym
BINARY ANTONYMS

 Are pairs that exhaust all possibilities along


some dimension
 Dead and alive
ANTONYMS  Everything that can be dead or alive is, in
fact, either dead or alive: there is no middle
ground between the two.

DEAD ALIVE
GRADABLE ANTONYMS

 Are pairs that describe opposite ends of a


continuous dimension
 Hot and cold
ANTONYMS  Not everything that can be hot or cold is, in
fact, either hot or cold.

HOT . . . WARM. . . . COOL . . . COLD


CONVERSE ANTONYMS

 Pairs that describe a single relationship


between two items from opposite
perspectives (relational)
ANTONYMS  Above and below
 If a picture is above a sofa, then the sofa is
necessarily below the picture
ABOVE
BELOW
REFERENCE
 Speaker reference – what the speaker is
referring to by using some linguistic
expression.
Here comes Queen Elizabeth.

REFERENCE  Linguistic reference – is the systematic


denotation of some linguistic expression as
part of a language.
Here comes Queen Elizabeth.
POINTS UNDER REFERENCE
Referent
Extension
Prototype
REFERENCE Stereotype
Coreference
Deixis
REFERENT
 The entity identified by the use of a referring
expression such as a noun or noun phrase.

REFERENCE That bird looks sick.


That bird – is the particular bird you are
pointing at
EXTENSION
 Refers to the set of all potential referents
for a referring expression.

Ex. Extension of bird is the set of all entities


REFERENCE (past, present, and future) that could be
systematically be referred to by the
expression bird.

The extension of bird is the set of all birds


 A typical member of the extension of a
referring expression .
 A robin or a bluebird might be a prototype
PROTOTYPE of a bird.
 A list of characteristics describing a
prototype
 The stereotype of a bird might be something
like it has two legs, tow wings, has feathers,
STEREOTYPE is about six to eight inches from head to tail,
makes a chirping noise, lays eggs, builds
nests.
Two linguistic expressions that have
the same extralinguistic referent.
 Jay Leno is the host of the “Tonight Show.”
COREFERENC  Jay Leno and the host of the Tonight show
E are coreferential because they both mean
the same thing; that is they are
synonymous.
 A deictic expression has one meaning but
can refer to different entities depending on
the speaker and his or her spatial and
DEIXIS temporal orientation.
(DIKE-SIS)
Ex. You and I, Here and There, and Right and Left.
I = Jack You= Jill
Ex. Members of the Congress believe they
deserve a raise.
Anaphora

The process of replacing a longer expression by a pronoun or


another kind of “pro-form”

Jan saw the boy with the telescope.


Dan also saw him.

Emily hugged Cassidy as did Zachary.


I am sick, which depresses me.
Can be found in proform which is to express stands for another
word, phrase, clause or sentence where the meaning is retrieved from
the context
Anaphoric Proform – is used to avoid the usage and the repetition of the word
expression used in one sentence.
Examples of Proforms: Pronoun, Pro-adjective, Pro-verb, Pro-
adverb, Pro-sentence
Pronoun - is used to substitute a noun or noun phrase in a
sentence
Laptop is the most important gadget in student life because it is
Examples needed to do assignment and search for material.
Pro-Adjective – used to substitute an adjective or phrase that
functions as an adjective
Her dress is green. So is mine.
Pro-adverb – used to substitute an adverb or phrase in a
sentence.
He exercised regularly. I did too.

Examples Pro-verb – it is used to substitute for a verb or verb phrase


I like cats as he does.
Pro-sentence – substitutes an entire sentence or subsentence
Do you love animals? Yes, I do.
Anaphora

A linguistic expression that refers to


another linguistic expression

Mary wants to play whoever thinks himself


capable of beating her.

The linguistic expression himself refers to


whoever.
In the sentence "I told Paul to
close the door and he did so,"
the clause "he did so" makes use
of anaphora.
TRUTH
CONDITIONS
The study of different types of truth
embodied in individual sentence.

Categories in the The study of different types of truth


study of truth in relations that hold between
Semantics
sentences.
Different types of truth embodied in
individual sentence

Truth Analytic sentence – one that is necessarily true


Conditions simply by the virtue of the words in it.
A bachelor is an unmarried man.
Different types of truth embodied in
individual sentence

Truth Contradictory sentence – one that is


necessarily false simply by the virtue of the
Conditions words in it.
A bachelor is a married man.
A blue gas is colorless.
A square has five equal sides.
Different types of truth embodied in
individual sentence

Truth Synthetic sentence – may be true or false


depending on how the world is.
Conditions My next door neighbor, Din, is married.
Different types of truth relations that
hold between sentence

Truth 1. Entailment
Conditions 2. Presupposition
A proposition (expressed in a
sentence) that follows necessarily from
another sentence.
Ex.
Entailment John fried fish entails John cooked fish.

The Duke of New York suffered a fatal


heart attack entails The Duke of New
York is dead.
 A proposition that is assumed to be true in
order to judge the truth or falsity of
another sentence.
Ex.
Presupposition  John didn’t pass chemistry presupposes
that John took chemistry.
 The Duke of New York is dead
presupposes that there is a Duke in New
York.

You might also like