Bioeconomics - Lecture 4
Bioeconomics - Lecture 4
Lecture-4
Economics of Ecological and Natural Resources
• As we have already discussed that the Environmental Economics is of two
types viz. Ecological Economics & Natural Resource Economics.
• One of the major concern / problem, faced by researchers at large is
impeding progress in attempts to incorporate ecological functions into
economic models, i.e. how to value goods and services, provided by
ecosystem into monetary terms.
• The problem arises because one of the parameter in economic models is
‘PRICE’, and since ecosystem goods and services are not traded in markets,
they have NO PRICE.
• Recent methodological advances have been made that allow such goods to
be valued
Environmental Evaluation
• The proper valuation of non-market environmental commodities has significant policy
implications.
• In past, such commodities have been assigned ZERO or NO VALUE, due to difficulties
involved in assigning economic value.
• Failure to account for values of some environmental resources has resulted in decisions
that have had negative implications for the environment and the society.
• Environmental evaluation is also important in the event of natural disaster, either man-
made or naturally occurring
• The value of ecosystem services and biodiversity is a reflection of what we, as a society,
are willing to trade off to conserve these natural resources.
Environmental Evaluation Contd.
• Economic valuation of ecosystem services and biodiversity can make explicit to society
in general and policy making in particular that biodiversity and ecosystem services are
scarce and that their depreciation or degradation has associated costs to society.
• Based on the costing / pricing methods (that we are going to see now), government
decide overall cost of the project based on COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS
(Eg. From India – Ayushman Bharat Scheme; National Mission for Clean Ganga
Environmental Evaluation- Example from United States
Exxon Valdez Oil Spill 1989
• The Exxon Valdez oil spill occurred when an oil tanker crashed onto the shore of Prince
William Sound in Alaska on March 24, 1989. Oil Tanker was owned by Exxon Shipping
Company
• It contaminated 1,300 miles of coastline with 250,000 barrels or 11 million gallons of oil.
• Direct contact with the oil slick killed at least 140 bald eagles, 302 harbor seals, 2,800 sea
otters, and 250,00 seabirds within a few days.
• Wildlife value is measured by the cost to obtain or rehabilitate them.
o Zoos pay as much as $50,000 dollars to capture an otter. The cost of losing 2,800 of these endangered
species is $140 million. Exxon paid between $40,000-$90,000 to rehabilitate them, confirming the
otter's value.
o Harbor seals go for $20,000, so losing 302 costs $604,000.
o Most seabirds cost $300 each, so losing 250,000 costs $75 million.
o Eagles cost $22,000 to rehabilitate, so 140 are worth $3 million.
Total cost for just these four species in the first week was $218.6 million.
Why is valuation of environmental resources / natural
resources done?
• Missing markets
• Imperfect markets and market failures
• For some biodiversity goods and services, it is essential to understand
and appreciate its alternatives and alternative uses
• Uncertainty involving demand and supply of natural resources,
especially in the future
• Government may like to use the valuation rather than restricted,
administered or operating market prices for designing
biodiversity/ecosystem conservation programmes;
• In order to arrive at natural resource accounting, for methods such as
Net Present Value methods, valuation is a must.
Approaches for evaluation of Nature’s value
Types of valuation methods
Types of valuation methods