Scribd
Upload
25 views

Lecture 4

Manual assembly lines consist of multiple workstations where workers perform assembly tasks on products moving down the line. Factors favoring assembly lines include high demand for similar products that can be divided into work elements. The theoretical minimum number of workers is determined by the cycle time and work content time per worker, but repositioning losses and uneven work distribution mean the actual number is higher. Various algorithms can be used to balance the work assignments across stations, such as assigning the highest-time elements first. Other considerations in line design include analyzing bottlenecks and using buffers or parallel stations. Alternatives to assembly lines include single-station cells or assembly by worker teams.

Uploaded by

Rawan Alkatheeri
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
25 views

Lecture 4

Manual assembly lines consist of multiple workstations where workers perform assembly tasks on products moving down the line. Factors favoring assembly lines include high demand for similar products that can be divided into work elements. The theoretical minimum number of workers is determined by the cycle time and work content time per worker, but repositioning losses and uneven work distribution mean the actual number is higher. Various algorithms can be used to balance the work assignments across stations, such as assigning the highest-time elements first. Other considerations in line design include analyzing bottlenecks and using buffers or parallel stations. Alternatives to assembly lines include single-station cells or assembly by worker teams.

Uploaded by

Rawan Alkatheeri
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 35

Engineering Process

Management
[MEME661]
Dr. Ibrahim Shaban
Spring 2024
Lecture 4 Manual Assembly
Lines
Today’s Topics

Fundamentals of Analysis of Single


Line Balancing
Manual Assembly Model Assembly
Algorithms
Lines Lines

Other
Considerations in Alternative
Assembly Line Assembly Systems
Design
Manual Assembly Lines
Work systems consisting of multiple workers organized to produce a single product
or a limited range of products

Assembly workers perform tasks at workstations located along the line-of-flow of


the product

Factors favoring the use of assembly lines:


• High or medium demand for product
• Similar or identical products
• Total work content can be divided into work elements
• Not possible to automate assembly tasks
Why Assembly Lines are Productive
Specialization of labor

• Learning curve

Interchangeable parts

• Components made to close tolerances

Work flow

• Products are brought to the workers

Line pacing

• Workers must complete their tasks within the cycle time of the line
Manual Assembly Line

A production line that consists of a sequence of workstations where assembly


tasks are performed by human workers

Products are assembled as they move At each station a portion of the total work
along the line content is performed on each unit

Base parts are launched onto the


Workers add components to progressively build
beginning of the line at regular intervals the product
(cycle time)
Manual Assembly Line

Configuration of an n-workstation manual assembly line


•Two assembly operators working on an engine
assembly line (photo courtesy of Ford Motor
Company)
Assembly Workstation

A designated location along the work flow path at which one or more work elements are
performed by one or more workers

Typical operations performed at manual assembly stations

Adhesive application Electrical connections Snap fitting


Sealant application Component insertion Soldering
Arc welding Press fitting Stitching/stapling
Spot welding Riveting Threaded fasteners
Work Transport Systems
Manual methods
• Work units are moved between stations by the workers without powered conveyor
• Problems:
• Starving of stations
• Blocking of stations

Mechanized work transport - types:


• Continuously moving conveyor
• Synchronous transport
• Asynchronous transport
Coping with Product Variety
Single model assembly • Every work unit is the same
line (SMAL)

• Two or more different products


Batch model assembly • Products are so different that they must be made in
line (BMAL) batches with setup between

• Two or more different models


Mixed model • Differences are slight so models can be made
assembly line (MMAL) simultaneously with no downtime
Analysis of Single Model Lines

Annual demand must be reduced to an hourly production rate

where number of shifts/week, and number of hours/shift


Determining Cycle Time

Production rate is converted to a cycle time accounting for line


efficiency

where 60 converts hourly production rate to cycle time in minutes,


and proportion uptime on the line
Number of Workers Required

The theoretical minimum number of workers on the line is


determined as:

where , min; and , min/worker


Theoretical Minimum Not Possible

Two reasons why theoretical minimum number of workers cannot be


achieved in practice:
 Repositioning losses – Some time will be lost at each station every
cycle for repositioning the worker or the work unit; thus, the
workers will not have the entire each cycle
 Line balancing problem – It is not possible to divide the work
content time evenly among workers, and some workers will have an
amount of work that is less than
Repositioning Losses

•Repositioning losses occur on a production line because some time is


required each cycle to reposition the worker, the work unit, or both
•
•Service time = time available each cycle for the worker to work on the
product
Cycle Time on an Assembly Line

Components of cycle time at several stations on a manual assembly line


Line Balancing Problem

Given:
• The total work content consists of many distinct work elements
• The sequence in which the elements can be performed is restricted
• The line must operate at a specified cycle time
The Problem:
• To assign the individual work elements to workstations so that all workers have an
equal amount of work to perform
Work Element Times
Total work content time

where work element time for element


Work elements are assigned to station i that add up to the service time
for that station

The station service times must add up to the total work content time
Precedence Constraints
Restrictions on the order in which work elements can be performed

Precedence
diagram
Measures of Balance Efficiency

Line balance efficiency Eb

Balance delay d

Note that
Worker Requirements

The actual number of workers on the assembly line is given


by:
Workstation Manning Level

Defined as the number of workers per station


 For a single station, station i,

 For the line,

where w = number of workers, and n = number of stations on the line


Tolerance Time

Defined as the time a work unit spends inside the boundaries of the
workstation
 Provides a way to allow for product-to-product variations in task times
at a station

where , min; and


Line Balancing Objective

To distribute the total work content on the assembly line as evenly as possible
among the workers

or

Subject to:
(1)

(2) all precedence requirements are obeyed


Line Balancing Algorithms

1. Largest candidate rule


2. Kilbridge and Wester method
3. Ranked positional weights method, also known as the Helgeson and
Birne method

In the following descriptions, assume one worker per workstation


Largest Candidate Rule

List all work elements in descending order based on their values; then,
1. Start at the top of the list and selecting the first element that satisfies precedence
requirements and does not cause the total sum of to exceed the allowable value
When an element is assigned, start back at the top of the list and repeat selection
process
2. When no more elements can be assigned to the current station, proceed to next
station
3. Repeat steps 1 and 2 until all elements have been assigned to as many stations as
needed
Solution for Largest
Candidate Rule
Solution for Largest Candidate Rule
Physical layout of workstations and assignment of elements to stations using the largest
candidate rule
Kilbridge and Wester Method

Arrange work elements into columns according to their positions in


the precedence diagram
 Work elements are then organized into a list according to their
columns, starting with the elements in the first column
 Proceed with same steps 1, 2, and 3 as in the largest candidate rule
Kilbridge & Wester Method

Arrangement of elements into columns for the K&W algorithm


Ranked Positional Weights Method

A ranked position weight () is calculated for each work element


 for element is calculated by summing the values for all of the elements
that follow element in the diagram plus itself
 Work elements are then organized into a list according to their values,
starting with the element that has the highest value
 Proceed with same steps 1, 2, and 3 as in the largest candidate rule
Other Considerations in Line Design
Methods analysis

• To analyze methods at bottleneck or other troublesome workstations

Utility workers

• To relieve congestion at stations that are temporarily overloaded

Preassembly of components

• Prepare certain subassemblies off-line to reduce work content time on the


final assembly line
Other Considerations - continued
Storage buffers between stations

• To permit continued operation of certain sections of the line when


other sections break down
• To smooth production between stations with large task time
variations

Parallel stations

• To reduce time at bottleneck stations that have unusually long task


times
Alternative Assembly Systems
Single-station manual assembly cell

• A single workstation in which all of the assembly work is accomplished on


the product or on some major subassembly
• Common for complex products produced in small quantities, sometimes one
of a kind

Assembly by worker teams

• Multiple workers assigned to a common assembly task


• Advantage: greater worker satisfaction
• Disadvantage: slower than line production

You might also like