0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views

WK 3 Intersubjectivity

This document discusses the concept of intersubjectivity and how individuals construct meaning together through communication and interaction. It explores perspectives on intersubjectivity from Confucius, Martin Buber, and Karol Wojtyla. The document also encourages readers to enhance relationships with underprivileged people and those with disabilities by recognizing our shared humanity.

Uploaded by

Arthur Andres
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
3 views

WK 3 Intersubjectivity

This document discusses the concept of intersubjectivity and how individuals construct meaning together through communication and interaction. It explores perspectives on intersubjectivity from Confucius, Martin Buber, and Karol Wojtyla. The document also encourages readers to enhance relationships with underprivileged people and those with disabilities by recognizing our shared humanity.

Uploaded by

Arthur Andres
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

Intersubjectivity

PERFORMANCE STANDARD
Demonstrate an appreciation for the talents of
persons with disabilities and those from the
underprivileged sectors of society.
OBJECTIVES
1. Define intersubjectivity;
2. Identify the similarities and differences of
intersubjective concepts of the three philosophers-
Confucius, Martin Buber, and Karol Wojtyla;
3. Explore your intersubjective experiences;
4. Enhance your relations with people especially the
underprivileged and people with disability.
UNDERPRIVILEDGE PEOPLE
1.What is in your mind when you see the two
pictures? How do you feel about it? Why?

2.Have you ever imagine the scenario in real


life situations?
The Parable of the
Good Samaritan
Luke 10:29-37
“A man was going down from Jerusalem to
Jericho, when he was attacked by robbers. They
stripped him of his clothes, beat him and went
away, leaving him half dead. A priest happened to
be going down the same road, and when he saw
the man, he passed by on the other side. So too, a
Levite, when he came to the place and saw him,
passed by on the other side.
But a Samaritan, as he traveled, came where the
man was; and when he saw him, he took pity on
him. He went to him and bandaged his wounds,
pouring on oil and wine. Then he put the man on
his own donkey, brought him to an inn and took
care of him. The next day he took out two denario
and gave them to the innkeeper. ‘Look after him,’
he said, ‘and when I return, I will reimburse you
for any extra expense you may have.’
QUESTIONS
1. What virtue(s) does the parable show?
2. What do you think is the reason why the Good
Samaritan helped the stranger despite their social
differences?
3. If you are the Samaritan, would you do the same?
Justify your answer.
Narrate your experience like the Good
Samaritan, you have an encounter with
strangers who need help.
INTERSUBJECTIVITY
INTERSUBJECTIVITY
“inter” which connotes “among and between”

the philosophical term “subject” that is


equivalent to a conscious being.
INTERSUBJECTIVITY
“sharing of subjective states by two or
more individuals.” (Scheff 2006).

organic union of the subjective reality


and the objective reality of beings.
PHILOSOPHICAL VIEWS ON
INTERSUBJECTIVITY
1.Confucianism is Ren or
“human-heartedness.”
2.He calls every man to love the
other through actions, not
through thoughts
PHILOSOPHICAL INQUIRY ON INTERSUBJECTIVITY

1.Confucianism is Ren or “human-


heartedness.”
2.Martin Buber
“I-Thou” and “I-It”
relationships to
embody his philosophy.

we have to respect
others as we respect
ourselves.
3. Karol Wojtyla
(Pope John Paul II, visited Phil
twice)
-human action is the foundation of
our being.
3. Karol Wojtyla
theory of participation, man has the capacity to share
himself to others.
This affirms the reality that man acts and exists with
others.
as member of the community of persons, a community
of “I-You” or “We.”, his experience with others gives
him meaning and allows him to create meaning with
others.
INTERSUBJECTIVITY
how individuals construct meaning
together through communication and
interaction.
Written Work 3
Group Activity
3 sentences each.

RUBRICS
5 content
5 connection with the lesson
10 total points
REFLECTION QUESTION. Group Activity
1. Each member will give some personal
experiences about how you feel when you
are treated as a object/subject. Is it lawful
to do the same to others? Why?
2. How can you make a better world if we
prioritize intersubjective relationships?
PETA 3
(20 points)
ROLE PLAY ON HOW
INTERSUBJECTIVITY IS SHOWN IN REAL
LIFE SITUATIONS. Follow the guidelines in
your role play.
RUBRICS
10 PRESENTATION
10 CONTENT
1. Give 1 instance in your life when you feel
you are treated as an object. Share the
experience, feelings in the role play.
2. Show the reason why people treat others as
objects.
3. Show that we can make a better world if we
prioritize intersubjective relationships over
economic progress.

You might also like