Chapter 2 PPT-Adjusted
Chapter 2 PPT-Adjusted
CHAPTER 2
Strategy Formulation,
Execution, and
Governance
© 2021 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. Authorized only for instructor use in the classroom.
No reproduction or further distribution permitted without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
© McGraw Hill
The Strategy Formulation, Strategy Execution Process
© McGraw Hill
FIGURE 2.1 The Strategy Formulation, Strategy Execution Process
© McGraw Hill
TABLE 2.1 Factors Shaping Decisions in the Strategy Formulation,
Strategy Execution Process
What are the key factors of future competitive Is the company competitively stronger or
success, and does the industry offer good weaker than key rivals?
prospects for attractive profits for companies
possessing those capabilities?
© McGraw Hill
Strategic Inflection Point and Strategic Plan
© McGraw Hill
Stage 1: Developing a Strategic Vision, a Mission,
and Core Values
A Strategic Vision:
• Is top management’s view of “where we are going.”
• Defines the firm’s direction and its future product-market-customer-
technology focus to stakeholders.
• Is distinctive and specific to a particular organization.
• Avoids use of generic, innocuous, and uninspiring language that
could apply to most any firm.
• Definitively states how the company’s leaders intend to position
the firm beyond where it is today.
© McGraw Hill
CORE CONCEPT: Strategic Vision
© McGraw Hill
TABLE 2.2 Characteristics of Effectively Worded Vision Statements
TYPE DESCRIPTION
Graphic Paints a picture of the kind of company that management is trying to create and
the market position(s) the company is striving to stake out.
Directional Is forward looking; describes the strategic course that management has charted
and the kinds of product-market-customer-technology changes that will help the
company prepare for the future.
Focused Is specific enough to provide managers with guidance in making decisions and
allocating resources.
Flexible Is not so focused that it makes it difficult for management to adjust to changing
circumstances in markets, customer preferences, or technology.
Feasible Is within the realm of what the company can reasonably expect to achieve.
Desirable Indicates why the directional path makes good business sense.
Easy to Is explainable in 5 to 10 minutes and, ideally, can be reduced to a simple,
communicate memorable “slogan”
Source: Based partly on John P. Kotter, Learning Change (Harvard Business School Press, 1996)
© McGraw Hill
TABLE 2.3 Common Shortcomings in Company Vision Statements
SHORTCOMING DESCRIPTION
Vague or Short on specifics about where the company is headed or what the
incomplete company is doing to prepare for the future.
Not forward Doesn’t indicate whether or how management intends to alter the company’s
looking current product-market-customer-technology focus.
Too broad So all-inclusive that the company could head in most any direction, pursue
most any opportunity, or enter most any business.
Bland or Lacks the power to motivate company personnel or inspire shareholder
uninspiring confidence about the company’s direction.
Not distinctive Provides no unique firm identity; could apply to firms in any of several
industries (including rivals operating in the same market arena).
Too reliant on Doesn’t say anything specific about the company’s strategic
superlatives course beyond the pursuit of such distinctions as being a recognized leader, a
global or worldwide leader, or the first choice of customers.
Source: Based on information in Hugh Davidson, The Committed Enterprise (Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, 2002), chap. 2; and Michel Robert, Strategy Pure and Simple II (New York: McGraw-Hill,
1998), chaps. 2, 3, and 6.
© McGraw Hill
Concepts and Connections 1.1
Examples of Strategic Visions—How Well Do They Measure Up?
Effective Short-
Company Vision Statement Elements comings
Whole Whole Foods Market is a dynamic leader in the quality food business. We are a • Forward-looking • Long
mission-driven company that aims to set the standards of excellence for food retailers. • Graphic • Not
Foods We are building a business in which high standards permeate all aspects of our • Focused memorable
company. Quality is a state of mind at Whole Foods Market. • Desirable
Our motto—Whole Foods, Whole People, Whole Planet—emphasizes that our vision
reaches far beyond just being a food retailer. Our success in fulfilling our vision is
measured by customer satisfaction, team member happiness and excellence, return on
capital investment, improvement in the state of the environment and local and larger
community support.
Our ability to instill a clear sense of interdependence among our various stakeholders
(the people who are interested and benefit from the success of our company) is
contingent upon our efforts to communicate more often, more openly, and more
compassionately. Better communication equals better understanding and more trust.
Dr. Pepper A leading producer and distributor of hot and cold beverages to satisfy every consumer • Focused • Not graphic
need, anytime and anywhere. • Desirable • Not distinctive
• Easy to
communicate
Caterpillar Our vision is a world in which all people’s basic needs—such as shelter, clean water, • Graphic • Too broad
sanitation, food and reliable power—are fulfilled in an environmentally sustainable • Desirable • Too reliant on
way and a company that improves the quality of the environment and the communities superlatives
where we live and work. • Not distinctive
Nike NIKE, Inc., fosters a culture of invention. We create products, services and experiences • Forward-looking • Vague
for today’s athlete* while solving problems for the next generation. • Flexible • Not focused
• Too reliant on
superlatives
© McGraw Hill
The Importance of Communicating the Strategic Vision
© McGraw Hill
Expressing the Essence of the Vision in a Slogan
Disney
• To "create happiness by providing the finest
in entertainment for people of all ages,
everywhere."
The Mayo Clinic
• The best care to every patient every day.
Greenpeace
• To halt environmental abuse and promote
environmental solutions.
© McGraw Hill
Why a Sound, Well-Communicated Strategic Vision Matters
© McGraw Hill
Strategic Vision versus Mission Statement
© McGraw Hill
Developing a Company Mission Statement
© McGraw Hill
CORE CONCEPT: Mission Statement
© McGraw Hill
Example of a Mission Statement
© McGraw Hill
Strategic Mission, Vision, and Profit
© McGraw Hill
CORE CONCEPT: Values
© McGraw Hill
Linking the Strategic Vision and Mission
with Company Values
© McGraw Hill
Stage 2: Setting Objectives
Managerial Purpose in Setting Objectives.
• To convert the strategic vision into specific performance targets.
• To create yardsticks to track progress and measure performance.
Managerially Valuable Objectives.
• Are well-stated (clearly worded).
• Are challenging, yet achievable such that they stretch the organization
to perform at its full potential.
• Are quantifiable (measurable).
• Contain a specific deadline for achievement.
© McGraw Hill
The Imperative of Setting Stretch Objectives
To promote outstanding performance, managers must set its
performance targets high enough to stretch an organization
to perform at its full potential.
A company exhibits strategic intent when it relentlessly
pursues an ambitious strategic objective.
© McGraw Hill
CORE CONCEPT: Objectives, Stretch Objectives,
and Strategic Intent
Objectives are an organization’s performance targets—the results
management wants to achieve.
Stretch objectives set performance targets high enough to stretch
an organization to perform at its full potential and deliver the best
possible results.
Strategic intent is embodied in the organization’s relentless pursuit
of an ambitious strategic objective, concentrating the full force of
its resources and competitive actions on achieving that objective.
© McGraw Hill
Stage 2: Setting Financial Objectives
What Kinds of Financial Objectives to Set:
• Financial objectives.
• Communicate management’s targets for financial performance.
• Are lagging indicators reflecting results of past decisions and organizational
activities.
• Relate to revenue growth, profitability, and return on investment.
© McGraw Hill
Stage 2: Setting Strategic Objectives
What Kinds of Strategic Objectives to Set:
• Strategic objectives.
• Are related to a firm’s marketing standing and competitive vitality.
• Are leading indicators of a firm’s future financial performance and business
prospects.
• If achieved, indicate that a firm’s future financial performance will be
better than its current or past performance.
© McGraw Hill
CORE CONCEPT: Financial Objectives and
Strategic Objectives
Objectives are an organization’s performance targets—results
management wants to achieve.
Financial objectives relate to the financial performance targets
management has established for the organization to achieve.
Strategic objectives relate to target outcomes that indicate a
company is strengthening its market standing, competitive vitality,
and future business prospects.
© McGraw Hill
CORE CONCEPT: The Balanced Scorecard
© McGraw Hill
Table 2.4 The Balanced Scorecard Approach
to Performance Measurement
Financial Objectives. Strategic Objectives.
• An x percent increase in annual • Win an x percent market share.
revenues. • Achieve customer satisfaction rates of x percent.
• Annual increases in earnings • Achieve a customer retention rate of x percent.
per share of x percent.
• Acquire x number of new customers.
• An x percent return on capital
• Introduce x number of new products in the next
employed (ROCE) or
three years.
shareholder investment (ROE).
• Reduce product development times to x months.
• Bond and credit ratings of x.
• Increase the percentage of sales coming from
• Internal cash flows of x to fund
new products to x percent.
new capital investment.
• Improve information systems capabilities to give
managers defect information in x minutes.
• Improve teamwork by increasing the number of
projects involving more than one business unit to
x.
© McGraw Hill
Short-Term and Long-Term Objectives
Short-term Objectives Long-term Objectives
• Are targets to be • Are targets to be achieved
achieved soon. within 3 to 5 years.
• Represent milestones or
stair steps for reaching
long-range performance.
© McGraw Hill
The Need for Objectives at All Organizational Levels
Objectives are needed at all levels.
• To set business-level objectives.
• To set establish functional-area objectives.
• To set operating-level objectives.
Long-term objectives take precedence over
short-term objectives.
© McGraw Hill
Stage 3: Crafting a Strategy
Crafting a strategy means asking:
• How to attract and please customers?
• How to compete against rivals?
• How to position the firm in the marketplace and capitalize on attractive
opportunities to grow the business?
• How best to respond to changing economic and market conditions?
• How to manage each functional piece of the business?
• How to achieve the firm’s performance targets?
© McGraw Hill
Strategy Formulation Involves Managers at
All Organizational Levels
In most firms, crafting strategy is a collaborative team effort that
includes managers in various positions and at various
organizational levels.
Crafting strategy is rarely something only high-level executives do.
A firm’s overall strategy is a collection of strategic initiatives and
actions devised by managers up and down the whole
organizational hierarchy.
© McGraw Hill
A Company’s Strategy-Making Hierarchy
A firm’s strategy is a collection of initiatives undertaken by
managers at all levels in the organizational hierarchy.
© McGraw Hill
CORE CONCEPT: Corporate Strategy and Business Strategy
© McGraw Hill
Figure 2.2 A Company’s Strategy-Making Hierarchy
© McGraw Hill
The Strategy-Making Hierarchy
STRATEGY DESCRIPTION
Corporate Is orchestrated by the CEO and other senior executives and establishes an
strategy overall game plan for managing a set of businesses in a diversified,
multibusiness company.
Addresses the questions of how to capture cross-business synergies,
what businesses to hold or divest, which new markets to enter, and how
to best enter new markets—by acquisition, creation of a strategic
alliance, or through internal development.
Business Is primarily concerned with building competitive advantage in a single
strategy business unit of a diversified company or strengthening the market
position of a nondiversified single business company.
Functional- Are concerned with actions related to particular functions or processes
area within a business (marketing strategy, production strategy, finance
strategies strategy, customer service strategy, product development strategy, and
human resources strategy).
Operating Are relatively narrow strategic initiatives and approaches for managing
strategies key operating units (plants, distribution centers, geographic units) and
specific operating activities such as materials purchasing or Internet sales.
© McGraw Hill
Stage 4: Implementing and Executing the Chosen Strategy
Managing the strategy execution process involves:
• Exerting the internal leadership • Installing information and
needed to propel implementation operating systems that enable
forward personnel to perform essential
activities
• Creating a company culture and
work climate conducive to • Ensuring that policies and
successful strategy execution procedures facilitate rather than
impede effective execution
• Tying rewards and incentives
directly to the achievement of • Allocating ample resources to
performance objectives activities critical to good strategy
execution
• Pushing for continuous
improvement in how value chain • Staffing the organization to provide
activities are performed needed skills and expertise
© McGraw Hill
Stage 5: Evaluating Performance and Initiating
Corrective Adjustments
© McGraw Hill
Corporate Governance: The Board of Directors
The Role of the Board of Directors in the Strategy-Formulation,
Strategy-Execution Process:
• Oversee the firm’s financial accounting and reporting practices.
• Diligently critique and oversee the company’s direction, strategy,
and business approaches.
• Evaluate the caliber of senior executives’ strategy-making and
strategy-executing skills.
• Institute a compensation plan for top executives that rewards them
for actions and results that serve shareholder interests.
© McGraw Hill
Strong Boards Lead to Good Corporate Governance
A Strong, Independent Board of Directors
• Is well informed about the company’s performance.
• Guides and judges the CEO and other top executives.
• Has the courage to curb management actions it believes are
inappropriate or unduly risky.
• Certifies to shareholders that the CEO is doing what the board expects.
• Provides insight and advice to management.
• Is intensely involved in debating the pros and cons of key decisions and
actions.
© McGraw Hill