Simplistic Reading Materials For Key Stage 2
Simplistic Reading Materials For Key Stage 2
BY
Learners who are thought to be more likely experience academic setbacks or discontinue
their education are referred to as learners-at-risk. Some schools' persistent policies of accepting
at-risk students into regular classes even if they are non-readers, these learners were encouraged
to advance to a new grade level without having their reading needs met. DepEd Order No. 45, s.
2002 Enforcement of No Read No Move Policy declares that until a pupil demonstrated mastery
of fundamental literacy abilities at a certain grade level, no student would be promoted to the
next higher grade. This simply serves to increase the number of readers in our nation who are
not successful.
In this School Year, the researchers have noticed a number of learners that are having
reading difficulties or are struggling readers. Their reading capabilities are lower than their
current Grade level or what is expected of them. This problem hinders the learning experience
To address the aforementioned situation, the researchers will use the simplistic materials
locally developed by the researchers. This is a school’s initiative to address the mentioned
3. What is the reading level of the identified learners after the utilization of the learning
materials?
PROPOSED INTERVENTION, INNOVATION AND STRATEGY
This study will employ Simplistic Reading Materials for Key Stage 2 available within
the means of the school. Simplistic Reading Materials for Key Stage 2 is usually used for
older struggling readers who have not developed good reading skills by the time they reach
middle grades. The program includes instruction in word recognition with varied simplistic
difficulties in word recognition through pretest and then develops a localized reading
Implementation Phase: The researchers will produce word drills such as localized basic
sight words, sight word bingo, sight word fishing, word jump, flash card fun. These
activities will strongly reinforce word recognition. Each session must be kept short and
Post Implementation Phase: Conduct posttest in word recognition to compare with the
pre-test if learning has been gained. Then awarding or giving incentives to the identified
This study will gather the information from the participants. The participants of the study
are the learners officially enrolled in Grade 6, Bokaw Elementary School, Bayawan City
Division of Bayawan City for S.Y. 2023-2024. The respondents are selected learners of
Grade 6 with reading difficulties/problem. In order to gather the data, the researcher will
conduct pre-test and post-test examination, taken or adopted from Simplistic Localized
Reading Tool. Other sources of information will be taken from related literature and studies.
2. Data Gathering Methods
The researchers first identify the respondents of the study who are the learners officially
enrolled in Grade 6, Bokaw Elementary School, Bayawan City Division of Bayawan City
for S.Y. 2023-2024. Pre-test examination aims to assess the prior knowledge of the learner
on reading. The researchers will analyze the result of the research interpretation that will
serve as the input for the proposed reading intervention. After the intervention, the result will
The data gathered will be the basis for the formulation of findings, conclusions, and
recommendations.
This study will use frequency and percentage statistical tools to identify the reading level
1. Printed Materials
MOOE 5,000.00
4. Documentation
MOOE 1,000.00
5. Miscellaneous
MOOE 5,000.00
Total
- 26,000.00
VI. PLANS FOR DISSEMINATION AND UTILIZATION
This section presents on how does the Simplistic Reading Materials for Key Stage 2 booklet
will be utilized and disseminated in order to let other colleagues or other schools can also
The Simplistic Reading Materials for Key Stage 2 will be disseminated through LAC
Sessions.
At the end of LAC Sessions, the Grades Four to Six teachers will be able to improve the reading
proficiency of struggling reader learners by at least 80% using Simplistic Reading Materials for Key Stage 2
Enabling Objectives:
2. Orient the teachers on the different parts of the Simplistic Reading Materials for Key Stage 2 and its
utilization.
4. Make an action plan on the utilization of Simplistic Reading Materials for Key Stage 5. Utilize the
Simplistic Reading Materials for Key Stage 2 to the identified struggling reader learners.
6. Feedback the reading progress of the identified struggling reader learners after using Simplistic Reading
Profile the reading level of the Let the teachers profile the reading March 2024 MOOE List of the struggling
Assessments.
on the
Orient the teachers on the different Discuss to the teachers the March 2024 MOOE Reflection Journal on the
Materials for Key Stage 2 and its Reading Materials for Key Stage 2 Reading Materials for
Make an action plan on the Let the teachers make an action plan April 2024 MOOE Printed action plan
Key Stage 2.
Present the crafted action plan. April 2024 MOOE Pictures during presentation
of action plan.
Utilize the Simplistic Reading Implement the crafted action plan April – MOOE Pictures during the conduct
Materials for Key Stage 2.to the through utilizing the May 2024 of intervention. Narrative
Feedback the reading progress of Let the teachers share the reading June 2024 MOOE Pictures during the giving
the identified struggling reader progress of their struggling reader of feedback and reflection
intervention
after using Simplistic Reading
Key Stage 2.
References (Use APA 7th Edition)
Alves, K. D., and Romig, J. E. (2021). Virtual reading Lessons for Upper Elementary Students with Learning
doi:10.1177/10534512211001865
Intervention on the reading Performance of Elementary Grade Students from Low-Income Families. Reading Writing
Q. 37 (2), 169–189.
doi:10.1080/10573569.2020.1760154
Cadime, I., Chaves-Sousa, S., Viana, F. L., Santos, S., Maia, J., and Ribeiro, I. (2021). Growth, Stability and
Pandemic Times: From Challenges to Changes According to Teachers’ Perceptions,” in Proceedings: 13th annual
doi:10.21125/iceri.2020.1316
National Center for Educational Statistics (2016). National assessment of educational progress: The nation's report
Pfost, M., Hattie, J., Dörfler, T., and Artelt, C. (2014). Individual Differences in
Wanzek, J., Petscher, Y., Al Otaiba, S., Rivas, B. K., Jones, F. G., Kent, S. C., Schatschneider, C., &
Mehta, P. (2017). Effects of a year long supplemental reading intervention for students with reading difficulties in
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED581509.pdf
Prepared by: