Canada 1930s
Canada 1930s
• in America a more aggressive attempt to lessen the impact of the Depression was under way
• newly elected President Roosevelt promises change and implements the revolutionary
ideas of British economist John Maynard Keynes
• America faced a problem: the economy had stalled, people not only could not buy things,
they would not (opting instead to save what little they had, often in their homes not in banks )
• many banks had failed and those that survived would not take risks: curtailing the
loaning of money to people or businesses
• desperate find a solution and to stop the destructive bank runs, Washington decided to
play an active role to bring economic stability
• FDR closed the banks (putting in place a “Bank Holiday”) and started to “print money”, which
enabled him to pump money into the system, prop up the banks, and stop the economy’s
downward deflationary cycle… the banks reopened with unlimited amounts of currency
• FDR’s government will implement programs designed to stimulate the economy and
provide work, all while running a budgetary deficit
• the government began massive public works projects to provide employment: it was
called the “New Deal” “I will directly
finance budget
“Happy “We have nothing to deficits, and build a
days are fear but fear itself” few dams”
here again,
just give me “Deficit
a chance” spending
is needed”
Roosevelt Keynes
No regulation
The economic spectrum 1933
Balanced budgets
Government regulation of business Self correcting market
Stimulus spending Free market
John Maynard
Keynes
Adam
“Me too”
Smith
“Darn
“Our unions”
“So delighted
“Odd Conservative
to have my win in Ontario
thing to
photo taken sends a clear
say”
with you sir” message to Mr.
Bennett”
Copy cat PM 1935
• it was then that Bennett too (like FDR) hit the airwaves, declaring that the free market
system had failed
• indeed, inspired by Roosevelt’s New Deal, he proposed his own reform measures to the
shock of wealthy Canadian businessmen
• these included: health and unemployment insurance, maximum hours of work, a
minimum wage, and aid for farmers
• the Employment and Social Insurance Act was passed
• these measures, however, did little to help the thousands already unemployed
• with his embrace of a (seemingly) radical reform platform, Bennett was clearly also
influenced by the policies of Canada’s new left
• the policies of Woodsworth and the (recently created) CCF became those of Bennett…
and so too in time his successor, King
• the question was, could Bennett pull it off?
“Capitalism creates inequality and
“Selfish men will whisper greed, it has given us the Great
against us [but these Depression and it seems a
reforms are a necessary deathbed conversion”
response to the] crash and
thunder of toppling “I am for reform and to my
capitalism” mind, reform means
government intervention, it
means government control
and regulation, and it means
the end of laissez-faire”
The end for one, rebirth for another 1935
• it was too little too late for Bennett, he went down with his ship, losing the election
• King, the victor in a majority, interestingly won only the same percentage of the popular
vote as he did in his 1930 electoral loss
• many votes that Bennett needed went to the new parties (CCF and the Socreds)
• King referred his predecessor’s New Deal legislation to the Supreme Court and as a
result many of its important provisions were declared unconstitutional
• back in power once again, Mackenzie King was no reformer… the cautious Liberal PM
does not undertake any new social policy initiatives until economy dips again in 1937
• within a year his government is financing a variety of work projects
• King will finally, and cautiously, embrace a Keynesian (deficit financing) budgetary
approach in 1939... bringing in national social policies “through the back door”
• it is only the start of World War Two that truly brings an end to Depression-era
hardships
“A house is not built from the top
down… to seek to erect an ambitious 1
program of social services upon a
“We never stationary or diminishing national
“l can
believed him” income is like building a house upon
do this”
the sands”
2
“It’s clearly “This war will permit
unconstitutional” unprecedented increases in
government activities and
expenditures needed to break the
Depression’s hold”
Internal tensions 1937-40
• the Great Depression brought heightened tensions between the federal and provincial
governments
• each sought to pass costly responsibilities onto the other
• after his return to power King attempted to address the issue by creating a Royal
Commission to delve into these shared responsibilities and economic turmoil
• eventually the Rowell-Sirois Report made a number of recommendations, including
equalization payments between the provinces
• the provinces feared losing powers to Ottawa, but nevertheless wanted federal
assistance to deal with the economic crisis
• to King’s chagrin, it also recommended Ottawa pay for unemployment insurance
• yet even the suggested payments sparked controversy: the wealthier provinces did not
want to support their less affluent neighbours
• the advent of World War Two quickly eased the economic hardship and with it the sense of
urgency attached to the recommendations… as a result little actually happened at the time
“It all can’t come “I can’t stand “Oh I’ve told the
from the top you either” PM on numerous
down, Ottawa occasions that
cannot afford all we need money”
these costs”
Hepburn Aberhart
Totalitarianism 1930s
• democracies typically see voters elect centrist parties, or just to the left or right of centre
• these parties accept a balance between private and state ownership of services
• yet in times of great upheaval, like the Great Depression, political parties from the Left or
Right wing are often elected, offering as they do radical solutions to big problems
• take for example the Social Credit in Alberta, a party both new and radical
• in times of deep political crisis, extreme parties often seize control of countries
• this occurred in Europe in the 1930s, as communist and fascist governments appeared
• these were highly nationalistic totalitarian governments, in which the state controls all
aspects of life
• laws and controls (censorship) were strict in these military states (with dreaded police
forces) and conformity essential
• a charismatic and dictatorial ruler was standard fare, so too terror and fear
“Neither the
Liberals or the
Conservatives will
get my vote this
time around”
The two extremes have similarities; the spectrum is not
strictly linear
On the far Left: communism 1930s
• in a leftist state, the economy is controlled by the government
• when left-wing ideology is taken to extremes, it can lead to a communist state
• the first nation to succeed with a communist experiment was the Soviet Union
• there, the communist state eliminated private ownership of property, controlling the
means of production and distribution
• the idea of collective well being was stressed in the Soviet Union, the rights and desires
of the individual being secondary to those of the state in a ‘classless society’
• blended with communist ideology was nationalism, the state controlled the media and
restricted movement within the country
• the supreme leader in the Soviet Russia was Joseph Stalin
• under his rule Soviet Communism translated into a totalitarian military state (with
elements of communism thrown in for good measure)