Scribd
Upload
21 views

TCP For Wireless Networks

This document discusses various TCP mechanisms for wireless networks including: Indirect TCP which segments connections to isolate the wireless link; Snooping TCP where the foreign agent buffers packets and performs local retransmissions; Mobile TCP which splits connections and supports lengthy disconnections; and techniques like fast retransmit/recovery, transmission freezing, selective retransmission, and transaction-oriented TCP to improve efficiency over wireless links. The goal is to make TCP work better for mobile and wireless networks while maintaining compatibility with the existing Internet infrastructure.

Uploaded by

Anbarasan TR
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
21 views

TCP For Wireless Networks

This document discusses various TCP mechanisms for wireless networks including: Indirect TCP which segments connections to isolate the wireless link; Snooping TCP where the foreign agent buffers packets and performs local retransmissions; Mobile TCP which splits connections and supports lengthy disconnections; and techniques like fast retransmit/recovery, transmission freezing, selective retransmission, and transaction-oriented TCP to improve efficiency over wireless links. The goal is to make TCP work better for mobile and wireless networks while maintaining compatibility with the existing Internet infrastructure.

Uploaded by

Anbarasan TR
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

TCP for Wireless Networks

Wireless Networks Spring 2005

Outline
Motivation TCP mechanisms Indirect TCP Snooping TCP Mobile TCP Fast retransmit/recovery Transmission freezing Selective retransmission Transaction oriented TCP

Adapted from J. Schiller, Mobile Communications, Chapter 10


Wireless Networks Spring 2005

Motivation
Transport protocols typically designed for
o Fixed end-systems o Fixed, wired networks

TCP congestion control


o Packet loss in fixed networks typically due to (temporary) overload situations o Routers discard packets as soon as the buffers are full o TCP recognizes congestion only indirectly via missing acknowledgements o Retransmissions unwise, they would only contribute to the congestion and make it even worse o Slow-start algorithm as reaction

Wireless Networks Spring 2005

TCP Slow Start


Sender calculates a congestion window for a receiver Start with a congestion window size equal to one segment Exponential increase of the congestion window up to the congestion threshold, then linear increase Missing acknowledgement causes the reduction of the congestion threshold to one half of the current congestion window Congestion window starts again with one segment

Wireless Networks Spring 2005

TCP Fast Retransmit/Recovery


TCP sends an acknowledgement only after receiving a packet If a sender receives several acknowledgements for the same packet, this is due to a gap in received packets at the receiver However, the receiver got all packets up to the gap and is actually receiving packets Therefore, packet loss is not due to congestion, continue with current congestion window (do not use slow-start)

Wireless Networks Spring 2005

Influences of mobility on TCP


TCP assumes congestion if packets are dropped
o typically wrong in wireless networks, here we often have packet loss due to transmission errors o furthermore, mobility itself can cause packet loss, if e.g. a mobile node roams from one access point (e.g. foreign agent in Mobile IP) to another while there are still packets in transit to the wrong access point and forwarding is not possible

The performance of an unchanged TCP degrades severely


o however, TCP cannot be changed fundamentally due to the large base of installation in the fixed network, TCP for mobility has to remain compatible o the basic TCP mechanisms keep the whole Internet together
Wireless Networks Spring 2005

Indirect TCP I
Indirect TCP or I-TCP segments the connection
o no changes to the TCP protocol for hosts connected to the wired Internet, millions of computers use (variants of) this protocol o optimized TCP protocol for mobile hosts o splitting of the TCP connection at, e.g., the foreign agent into 2 TCP connections, no real end-to-end connection any longer o hosts in the fixed part of the net do not notice the characteristics of the wireless part
mobile host access point (foreign agent) wired Internet

wireless TCP

standard TCP

Wireless Networks Spring 2005

I-TCP socket and state migration

access point1

socket migration and state transfer

Internet

access point2

mobile host

Wireless Networks Spring 2005

Indirect TCP II
Advantages
o no changes in the fixed network necessary, no changes for the hosts (TCP protocol) necessary, all current optimizations to TCP still work o transmission errors on the wireless link do not propagate into the fixed network o simple to control, mobile TCP is used only for one hop between, e.g., a foreign agent and mobile host o therefore, a very fast retransmission of packets is possible, the short delay on the mobile hop is known

Disadvantages
o loss of end-to-end semantics, an acknowledgement to a sender does not any longer mean that a receiver really got a packet, foreign agents might crash o higher latency possible due to buffering of data within the foreign agent and forwarding to a new foreign agent
Wireless Networks Spring 2005

Snooping TCP I
Transparent extension of TCP within the foreign agent buffering of packets sent to the mobile host lost packets on the wireless link (both directions!) will be retransmitted immediately by the mobile host or foreign agent, respectively (so called local retransmission) the foreign agent therefore snoops the packet flow and recognizes acknowledgements in both directions, it also filters ACKs changes of TCP only within the foreign agent (+min. MH change) correspondent
local retransmission foreign agent wired Internet snooping of ACKs buffering of data host

mobile host

end-to-end TCP connection


Wireless Networks Spring 2005

Snooping TCP II
Data transfer to the mobile host
o FA buffers data until it receives ACK of the MH, FA detects packet loss via duplicated ACKs or time-out o fast retransmission possible, transparent for the fixed network

Data transfer from the mobile host


o FA detects packet loss on the wireless link via sequence numbers, FA answers directly with a NACK to the MH o MH can now retransmit data with only a very short delay

Advantages:
o Maintain end-to-end semantics o No change to correspondent node o No major state transfer during handover

Problems
o Snooping TCP does not isolate the wireless link well o May need change to MH to handle NACKs o Snooping might be useless depending on encryption schemes
Wireless Networks Spring 2005

Mobile TCP
Special handling of lengthy and/or frequent disconnections M-TCP splits as I-TCP does
o unmodified TCP fixed network to supervisory host (SH) o optimized TCP SH to MH

Supervisory host
o no caching, no retransmission o monitors all packets, if disconnection detected
set sender window size to 0 sender automatically goes into persistent mode

o old or new SH reopen the window

Advantages
o maintains semantics, supports disconnection, no buffer forwarding

Disadvantages
o loss on wireless link propagated into fixed network o adapted TCP on wireless link
Wireless Networks Spring 2005

Fast retransmit/fast recovery


Change of foreign agent often results in packet loss
o TCP reacts with slow-start although there is no congestion

Forced fast retransmit


o as soon as the mobile host has registered with a new foreign agent, the MH sends duplicated acknowledgements on purpose o this forces the fast retransmit mode at the communication partners o additionally, the TCP on the MH is forced to continue sending with the actual window size and not to go into slow-start after registration

Advantage
o simple changes result in significant higher performance

Disadvantage
o further mix of IP and TCP (to know when there is a new registration), no transparent approach

Wireless Networks Spring 2005

Transmission/time-out freezing
Mobile hosts can be disconnected for a longer time
o no packet exchange possible, e.g., in a tunnel, disconnection due to overloaded cells or mux. with higher priority traffic o TCP disconnects after time-out completely

TCP freezing
o o o o MAC layer is often able to detect interruption in advance MAC can inform TCP layer of upcoming loss of connection TCP stops sending, but does not assume a congested link MAC layer signals again if reconnected

Advantage
o scheme is independent of data and TCP mechanisms (Ack,SN) => works even with IPsec

Disadvantage
o TCP on mobile host has to be changed, mechanism depends on MAC layer

Wireless Networks Spring 2005

Selective retransmission
TCP acknowledgements are often cumulative
o ACK n acknowledges correct and in-sequence receipt of packets up to n o if single packets are missing quite often a whole packet sequence beginning at the gap has to be retransmitted (go-back-n), thus wasting bandwidth

Selective retransmission as one solution


o RFC2018 allows for acknowledgements of single packets, not only acknowledgements of in-sequence packet streams without gaps o sender can now retransmit only the missing packets

Advantage: much higher efficiency Disadvantage


o more complex software in a receiver, more buffer needed at the receiver
Wireless Networks Spring 2005

Transaction oriented TCP


TCP phases
o connection setup, data transmission, connection release o using 3-way-handshake needs 3 packets for setup and release, respectively o thus, even short messages need a minimum of 7 packets!

Transaction oriented TCP


o RFC1644, T-TCP, describes a TCP version to avoid this overhead o connection setup, data transfer and connection release can be combined o thus, only 2 or 3 packets are needed

Advantage
o efficiency

Disadvantage
o requires changed TCP o mobility no longer transparent
Wireless Networks Spring 2005

You might also like