Classical Waterfall Model

 Classical waterfall model divides

life cycle into phases:
 feasibility study,
 requirements analysis and
specification,
 design,
 coding and unit testing,
 integration and system testing,
 maintenance.
1
Classical Waterfall Model

Feasibility Study

Req. Analysis

Design

Coding

Testing

Maintenance

2
Classical Waterfall Model
(CONT.)

 Most organizations usually define:

 entry and exit criteria for every phase.
 They also prescribe specific
methodologies for:
 specification,
 design,
 testing,
 project management, etc.

3
Feasibility Study
 Main aim of feasibility study:determine whether
developing the product
 financially worthwhile
 technically feasible.
 First roughly understand what the customer
wants:
 different data which would be input to the system,
 processing needed on these data,
 output data to be produced by the system,
 various constraints on the behavior of the system.

4
Activities during Feasibility
Study
 Work out an overall understanding
of the problem.
 Formulate different solution
strategies.
 Examine alternate solution
strategies in terms of:
 resources required,
 cost of development, and
 development time.
5
Activities during Feasibility
Study
 Perform a cost/benefit analysis:
 to determine which solution is the
best.
 you may determine that none of
the solutions is feasible due to:
 high cost,
 resource constraints,
 technical reasons.

6
Requirements Analysis and
Specification
 Aim of this phase:
 understand the exact
requirements of the customer,
 document them properly.
 Consists of two distinct
activities:
 requirements gathering and
analysis
 requirements specification. 7
Goals of Requirements
Analysis
 Collect all related data from the
customer:
 analyze the collected data to
clearly understand what the
customer wants,
 find out any inconsistencies and
incompleteness in the
requirements,
 resolve all inconsistencies and
incompleteness. 8
Requirements Gathering

 Gathering relevant data:

 usually collected from the end-
users through interviews and
discussions.
 For example, for a business
accounting software:
 interview all the accountants of the
organization to find out their
requirements.
9
Requirements Analysis (CONT.)

 The data you initially collect

from the users:
would usually contain several
contradictions and
ambiguities:
each user typically has only a
partial and incomplete view of
the system.
10
Requirements Analysis (CONT.)

 Ambiguities and contradictions:

 must be identified
 resolved by discussions with the
customers.
 Next, requirements are organized:
 into a Software Requirements
Specification (SRS) document.

11
Requirements Analysis (CONT.)

 Engineers doing
requirements analysis and
specification:
are designated as analysts.

12
Design
 Design phase transforms
requirements specification:
 into a form suitable for
implementation in some
programming language.

13
Design
 In technical terms:
 during design phase, software
architecture is derived from the
SRS document.
 Two design approaches:
 traditional approach,
 object oriented approach.

14
Traditional Design
Approach

 Procedural or Traditional design approach:

based on the data flow oriented design
approach. It consists of two important
activities ;
 Structured analysis: analysis of the
requirements specification is carried out
where the detailed structure of the problem
is examined.
15
Traditional Design Approach

Structured design: step

where the results of structured
analysis are transformed into
the software design
Structured design

16
Structured Analysis
Activity
 Identify all the functions to be
performed.
 Identify data flow among the
functions.
 Decompose each function
recursively into sub-functions.
 Identify data flow among the
subfunctions as well.

17
Structured Analysis (CONT.)

 Carried out using Data flow

diagrams (DFDs).
 After structured analysis, carry
out structured design:
 architectural design (or high-level
design)
 detailed design (or low-level
design).
18
DFD Diagram

19
Structured Design
 High-level design:
 decompose the system into modules,
 represent relationships among the
modules.
 Detailed design:
 different modules designed in greater
detail:
 data structures and algorithms for each
module are designed.

20
Object Oriented Design
 First identify various objects (real world
entities) occurring in the problem:
 identify the relationships among the
objects.
 For example, the objects in a pay-roll
software may be:
 employees,
 managers,
 pay-roll register,
 Departments, etc.

21
Object Oriented Design (CONT.)

 Object structure
 further refined to obtain the
detailed design.
 OOD has several advantages:
 lower development effort,
 lower development time,
 better maintainability.

22
 Q. Feasibility study includes these
activities:

 A. Gathering the requirements and

organizing in SRS document
 B. Examining alternate solutions for
problems
 C. Making a design of the SRS document

23
 Q. Which of these is not an activity of
Requirement Analysis and Specification?

 A. Requirement gathering and analysis

 B. Feasibility study
 C. Requirement Specification

24
 Q. The requirement analysis consist of :

 A. Gathering the requirements

 B. Removing incompleteness and
inconsistencies.
 C. Analyzing the feasibility of the project.

25
Implementation

 Purpose of implementation
phase (coding phase):
translate software design into
source code.

26
Implementation

 During the implementation

phase:
 each module of the design is
coded,
 each module is unit tested
 tested independently as a stand
alone unit, and debugged,
 each module is documented.
27
Implementation (CONT.)

 The purpose of unit testing:

 test if individual modules work
correctly.
 The end product of
implementation phase:
 a set of program modules that
have been tested individually.

28
Integration and System
Testing
 Different modules are integrated in
a planned manner:
 modules are almost never integrated
in one shot.
 Normally integration is carried out
through a number of steps.
 During each integration step,
 the partially integrated system is
tested.
29
Integration and System
Testing

M1 M2

M3 M4

30
System Testing
 After all the modules have been
successfully integrated and
tested:
 system testing is carried out.
• Three different kinds of testing
activities in system testing:
1.Testing: system testing performed by
the development team.
2.Testing: System testing performed by a
friendly set of customers 31
System Testing
3. Acceptance testing: After the software has
been delivered, the customer performs system
testing to determine whether to accept the
delivered software or reject it.

 Goal of system testing:

ensure that the developed system
functions according to its
requirements as specified in the SRS
document.

32
Maintenance
 Maintenance of any
software product:
requires much more effort than
the effort to develop the product
itself.
development effort to
maintenance effort is typically
40:60.
33
Maintenance (CONT.)

 Corrective maintenance:
 Correct errors which were not discovered
during the product development phases.
 Perfective maintenance:
 Improve implementation of the system
 enhance functionalities of the system.
 Adaptive maintenance:
 Port software to a new environment,
 e.g. to a new computer or to a new operating system.

34
Drawbacks of classical
water fall model

 1. no feedback paths
 2. difficult to accommodate changes
 3. No overlapping of phases
 4. Limited customer interactions

35
Iterative Waterfall Model
 Classical waterfall model is
idealistic:
 assumes that no defect is
introduced during any
development activity.
 in practice:
 defects do get introduced in almost
every phase of the life cycle.

36
Iterative Waterfall Model
(CONT.)

 Defects usually get detected

much later in the life cycle:
For example, a design defect might
go unnoticed till the coding or
testing phase.

37
Iterative Waterfall Model
(CONT.)

 Once a defect is detected:

 we need to go back to the phase
where it was introduced
 redo some of the work done during
that and all subsequent phases.
 Therefore we need feedback paths
in the classical waterfall model.

38
Iterative Waterfall Model
(CONT.)

Feasibility Study

Req. Analysis

Design

Coding

Testing

Maintenance

39
Iterative Waterfall Model
(CONT.)

 Errors should be detected

 in the same phase in which they are
introduced.
 For example:
 if a design problem is detected in
the design phase itself,
 the problem can be taken care of much
more easily than, if it is identified at the
end of the integration and system testing
phase.

40
Phase containment of
errors

 The principle of detecting errors as close to

its point of introduction as possible:
 is known as phase containment of errors.
 Iterative waterfall model is most widely
used model.
 Almost every other model is derived from the
waterfall model.

41
Prototyping Model
 Before starting actual development,
 a working prototype of the system
should first be built.
 A prototype is a toy implementation
of a system:
 limited functional capabilities,
 low reliability,
 inefficient performance.

42
Prototyping Model (CONT.)

 The reason for developing a

prototype is:
 it is impossible to ``get it right'' the
first time,
 we must plan to throw away the
first product
 if we want to develop a good product.
 Rapid Prototyping is a term used when a
prototype is made from software tools.
43
Prototyping Model (CONT.)

 The developed prototype is submitted

to the customer for his evaluation:
 Based on the user feedback, requirements are
refined.
 This cycle continues until the user approves
the prototype.
 The actual system is developed using
the classical waterfall approach.

44
 Prototyping Model (CONT.)

Build Prototype

Customer
Requirements satisfied
Customer
Gathering Quick Design Evaluation of Design
Prototype

Implement
Refine
Requirements Test

Maintenance

45
46
Prototyping Model (CONT.)

 Even though construction of a working

prototype model involves additional cost
--- for systems with unclear user requirements,
 For Systems with unresolved technical issues
 The overall development cost usually turns out
to be lower than an equivalent system
developed using the iterative waterfall model.

47
Evolutionary Model
 Evolutionary model:
 The system is broken down into several
modules which can be incrementally
implemented and delivered.
 First develop the core modules of the
system.
 The initial product skeleton is refined
into increasing levels of capability:
 by adding new functionalities in successive
versions.

48
Evolutionary Model (CONT.)

 Successive version of the

product:
 functioning systems capable of
performing some useful work.
 A new release may include new
functionality:
 also existing functionality in the
current release might have been
enhanced.
49
Evolutionary Model (CONT.)

C
A AB A
B

50
51
Advantages of Evolutionary
Model
 Users get a chance to experiment with a
partially developed system:
 much before the full working version is
released,
 Helps finding exact user requirements:
 much before fully working system is developed.
 Core modules get tested thoroughly:
 reduces chances of errors in final product.

52
Disadvantages of
Evolutionary Model
 Often, difficult to subdivide
problems into functional units:
 which can be incrementally
implemented and delivered.
 evolutionary model is useful for
very large problems,
 where it is easier to find modules for
incremental implementation.

53
Evolutionary Model with
Iteration
 Many organizations use a
combination of iterative and
incremental development:
 a new release may include new
functionality
 existing functionality from the
current release may also have
been modified.
54
Evolutionary Model with
iteration
 Several advantages:
 Training can start on an earlier release
 customer feedback taken into account
 Markets can be created:
 for functionality that has never been
offered.
 Frequent releases allow developers to
fix unanticipated problems quickly.

55
Spiral Model
 Proposed by Boehm in 1988.
 Each loop of the spiral represents a
phase of the software process:
 the innermost loop might be concerned with
system feasibility,
 the next loop with system requirements
definition,
 the next one with system design, and so on.
 There are no fixed phases in this model,
the phases shown in the figure are just
examples.
56
Spiral Model (CONT.)

 The team must decide:

 how to structure the project into phases.
 Start work using some generic model:
 add extra phases
 for specific projects or when problems are
identified during a project.
 Each loop in the spiral is split into
four sectors (quadrants).

57
Spiral Model (CONT.)

Determine Identify &

Objectives Resolve Risks

Review and
plan for next Develop Next
phase Level of Product

58
Objective Setting (First
Quadrant)

 Identify objectives of the phase,

 Examine the risks associated with
these objectives.
 Risk:
 any adverse circumstance that might
hamper successful completion of a
software project.

 Find alternate solutions possible.

59
Risk Assessment and Reduction (Second
Quadrant)

 For each identified project risk,

 a detailed analysis is carried out.
 Steps are taken to reduce the risk.
 For example, if there is a risk that the
requirements are inappropriate:
 a prototype system may be developed.

60
Spiral Model (CONT.)

 Development and Validation (Third quadrant):

quadrant
 develop and validate the next level of the
product.
 Review and Planning (Fourth quadrant):
quadrant
 review the results achieved so far with the
customer and plan the next iteration around the
spiral.
 With each iteration around the spiral:
 progressively more complete version of the
software gets built.

61
Spiral Model as a meta
model
 Subsumes all discussed models:
 a single loop spiral represents waterfall model.
 uses an evolutionary approach --
 iterations through the spiral are evolutionary levels.
 enables understanding and reacting to risks
during each iteration along the spiral.
 uses:
 prototyping as a risk reduction mechanism
 retains the step-wise approach of the waterfall
model.

62
Comparison of Different Life Cycle
Models
 Iterative waterfall model
 most widely used model.
 But, suitable only for well-understood
problems.
 Prototype model is suitable for
projects not well understood:
 user requirements

63
Comparison of Different Life Cycle
Models (CONT.)

 Evolutionary model is suitable for large

problems:
 can be decomposed into a set of modules that can
be incrementally implemented,
 incremental delivery of the system is acceptable
to the customer.
 The spiral model:
 suitable for development of technically challenging
software products that are subject to several
kinds of risks.
64