Social Science Dominant Approaches
Social Science Dominant Approaches
DOMINANT APPROACHES
AND IDEAS IN THE
SOCIAL SCIENCE
JURGEN HABERMAS - a German
philosopher and sociologist whose work was
closely tied to a form of political philosophy
and social criticism known as Critical Theory
Micro-level approaches
Macro-level approaches
Interdisciplinary approaches
1.1 Micro-level Approaches
- It focuses on social interactions, why individuals and
groups interact in the way they do, and how they
interpret the meanings of their own interactions. It use
the individual as the level of analysis
- Dominant approaches under this are Rational Choice
Theory and Symbolic Interactionism.
1.2 Macro-level Approaches
- It focuses on the social structure, social institutions,
and social, political, and economic change.
- It uses the social aggregate as the level of analysis.
- Dominant approaches under this are:
Structural-functionalism and Institutionalism.
1.3 Interdisciplinary Approach
- Among all the approaches only the human-
environment system approach is designed as
interdisciplinary.
- It integrates knowledge from the social and the
natural sciences within one framework to address
environmental and social issues.
- Dominant approach under this is Human-
Environment System approach
2. Historical-hermeneutic
- In Historical-hermeneutic approaches data are generated
by understanding human meanings and not through
observation of neutral facts.
- Dominant approaches under this are Psychoanalysis and
Hermeneutic Phenomenology.
3. Empirical-critical
- The empirical-critical approach is governed by emancipatory
interest.
- Emancipatory interests are “human interests that involve
reflecting on social, cultural, and political injustice and how
and why it comes to exist and how it might be remedied.
- Dominant approaches under this are Marxism and Feminist
Theory.
1. RATIONAL CHOICE THEORY
(RCT)
is a powerful tool in making sense of why people act or behave
in the way they do.
also known as the choice theory or rational action theory.
According to Elster “the essence of rational choice theory is
that when faced with several courses of action, people usually
do what they believe is likely to have the best overall outcome.
An assumption of the mainstream variant of RCT is that
"individuals have all the rational capacity, time, and
emotional detachment necessary to choose the best course of
action, no matter how complex the choice".
Critiques of Rational Choice Theory
Explaining collective action - That is if individuals simply base their actions
on calculations of personal profit, why would they ever choose to do
something that will benefit others more than themselves? Rational choice
theory does address behaviors that are selfless, altruistic, or philanthropic.
Social norms - This theory does not explain why some people seem to accept
and follow social norms of behavior that lead them to act in selfless ways or
to feel a sense of obligation that overrides their self-interest.
It is too individualistic - they fail to explain and take proper account of the
existence of larger social structures. That is, there must be social structures
that cannot be reduced to the actions of individuals.
2. SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM
• Herbert Blumer
-coined the term “Symbolic Interactionism”
- brains behind the theory of symbolic interactionism
• Charles Horton Cooley
- concept of the “looking glass self”