0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views18 pages

Chapter 5-1

Uploaded by

Ahmed Abdelhamid
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views18 pages

Chapter 5-1

Uploaded by

Ahmed Abdelhamid
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

Chapter 5

Factorial Designs
Example:
Suppose A is a factor representing the time
you leave home to work, and B is the factor
representing the road traffic conditions. If
the response y is the time you make it to
work, then:
“Nothing can be said about the effect of A
without reference to the level of B.”

In other words, A and B are interacting.


Two-Factor Factorial Designs:
Experiments involving two factors: A at a
levels and B at b levels, with each possible
combination replicated n times at random.
Results of (a x b x n) = N runs
B
A 1 2 …. b
1 y111,..,y11n y121,...y12n …. y1b1,..y1bn

2 y211,.., y21n y221,..y22n …. y2b1,..,y2bn


.. .. .. .. …. .. ..

a ya11,…,ya1n ya21,…,ya2n …. yab1,..yabn


The statistical Model:
Observed values of the response yijk can
be represented by the linear model:-
yijk     i   j  ( ) ij   ijk
Where,
(ij is a parameter representing the
average effect of the interaction between
the ith row and the jth column.
The hypotheses of interest:

1. Equality of row effects:


Ho: i = 0 Vs. H1: i  0
2. Equality of column effects:
Ho: j = 0 Vs. H1: j  0
3. No interaction effects:
Ho: (ij = 0 Vs. H1:
(ij  0
The ANOVA Proposition
The total variability in observed responses
can be decomposed into four components:
• Variability due to row effects.
• Variability due to column effects,
• Variability due to row-column
interactions, and
• Variability due to experimental Error.
The ANOVA Proposition
In terms of the Sum of Squares:
SSTotal = SSA+ SSB+ SSAB+SSError

The corresponding decomposition of the


number of degrees of freedom is:
(N-1) = (a-1) + (b-1)+ (a-1)(b-1)+ab(n-1)
The ANOVA Table:

Source SS df MS F0

A SSA (a-1) MSA

B SSB (b-1) MSB

AB SSAB (a-1)(b-1) MSAB

Error SSError ab(n-1) MSError

Total SSTotal (N-1)


Example:
An experiment is conducted to determine
the effects of the plate material and
temperature on the life of a battery. Three
levels of each factor selected, and a factorial
experiment with four replicates is
performed. The life data (in hours) follow:
Material Temperature oF (B)
Type (A) 15 70 125
1 130 155 34 40 20 70
74 180 80 75 82 58

2 150 188 136 122 25 70


159 126 106 115 58 45

3 138 110 174 120 96 104


168 160 150 139 82 60
ANOVA Table:

Source SS Df MS F0 P-value

A 10683.72 2 5341.86 7.91 0.0020


B 39118.72 2 19559.36 28.97 0.0001
AB 9613.78 4 2403.44 3.56 0.0186
Error 18230.75 27 675.21

Total 77646.97 35
There is a significant interaction between the type
of material (A) and temperature level (B), at
 > 0.0186.
Model Adequacy Checking
To detect violations of the basic assumptions
of the ANOVA procedure, we need to
examine the residuals given by:
eijk  yijk  yij

Where,yij is the cell average


The Interaction Plot:

Interaction Plot
160 Factor_A
1
Average Life (hours)

140 2
120 3

100
80
60
40
15 70 125
Temperature level
Interpretation:
By inspection of the plot, the following can be
inferred:
• At the low temperature level, the average
battery life is high regardless of the type of
material used.
• At the intermediate temperature level,
material type 3 shows the highest average
life.
• At the high temperature level, all averages
decrease with material type 3 having the
highest average life.
Conclusion:
The use of material type 3 is recommended
since it results in a minimum change of the
average life over all temperature levels.

You might also like