The Local and The Global. PAGO Lecture 2024a
The Local and The Global. PAGO Lecture 2024a
Christoforos Bouzanis
[email protected]
How can we understand “the local” in relation
to the national, the global or even to other
localities?
Held, D. (1999). The transformation of political community: rethinking democracy in the context of
globalization. In: Shapiro, I., Hacker-Cordón, C., Hardin, R. (Eds.). Democracy’s Edges.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 84-111.
Defining globalization
‘...the progressive eroding of the relevance of territorial
bases for social, economic, and political activities,
processes, and relations...’
(Scholte, 2005; cited in Crane & Matten, 2010)
Ritzer, G., & Dean, P. (2015). Globalization: A basic text. John Wiley & Sons. Chapters 1 & 2
Defining globalization – Ch I
“…it is clear that if one wanted to use a single term to think to
think about globalisation today, liquidity would be at or near
the top of the list. That is not to say that there are no solid
structures in the world… “(Ritzer & Dean, 2015, p. 5)
Ritzer, G., & Dean, P. (2015). Globalization: A basic text. John Wiley & Sons. Chapters 1 & 2
Three Waves of Globalisation Theory
(Hyper-) Globalists Skeptics Transformationalists
When did it begin New – late 20th C It’s old – Long historic process,
internationalisation but recent acceleration
and intensification
was at its height in
(integrated world
economy of
colonialism)
Defining glocalization
abstract concept in how to link the global with the local
It is frequently discussed as when international companies
adapt to the local environments (like McDonalds)
Or it is related to the idea that globalisation has reconstructed
ideas of “locality”, “home”, “community” (1995, p. 30)
The local in the global and the global in the local:
homogeneity Vs heterogeneity
See Robertson, R., (1995). Glocalization: time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. Global Modernities, 25-
44.
Implications: Institutional isomorphism –
DiMaggio & Powell (1983)
“In the initial stages of their life cycle, organisational fields
display considerable diversity in approach and form. Once a
field is established, however, there is an inexorable push towards
homogenisation.” (1983: 148)
Coercive isomorphism: pressures that are exerted to
organisations by other organisations – political influence or
problems of legitimacy
Mimetic isomorphism – as a response to uncertainty
Normative isomorphism – the result of professionalization: “…
the collective struggle of members of members of an occupation
to decline the conditions and methods of their work, to control
‘the production of the producers’ … and to establish a cognitive
base and legitimation for their occupational autonomy” (1983:
152)
Best airports in the world…
Seoul Incheon
Singapore Changi
Hong Kong
Retail parks…
.
Implications II: Institutional
isomorphism revisited – Beckert (2010)
Beckert (2010) aims at contributing an integrative perspective
that explains both isomorphism and divergence, rather than
overemphasizing divergence.
Coercive isomorphism: power is an ambivalent mechanism of
change that can lead to both homogenization and divergence
Normative isomorphism: institutional divergence follows
cultural divergence…
Mimetic isomorphism: it can lead to isomorphism as long as
the forms of others are considered successful… if not,
divergence can be a better path
Glocalisation: the McDonaldization of
Society – George Ritzer (1993)
Four dimensions of McDonaldization:
Efficiency: the optimum method for getting from one point
to another
Calculability: emphasis on quantification of production an
service
Predictability: the assurance that the products and services
will be the same over time and in all locales
Control: substitution of nonhuman for human technology –
increase of corporation’s control over workers who need to
follow strict rules.
Let’s think about it…