CH 4 Analysis and Design of Work
CH 4 Analysis and Design of Work
Chapter 4
The Analysis and Design
of Work
© 2023 McGraw Hill, LLC. All rights reserved. Authorized only for instructor use in the classroom. No reproduction or further distribution permitted without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill, LLC.
Learning Objectives
4-1 Analyze an organization’s structure and work-flow
process, identifying the output, activities, and inputs in
the production of a product or service.
4-2 Understand the importance of job analysis in strategic
human resource management.
4-3 Choose the right job analysis technique for a variety of
human resource activities.
4-4 Identify the tasks performed and the skills required in a
given job.
4-5 Understand the different approaches to job design.
4-6 Comprehend the trade-offs among the various
approaches to designing jobs.
© McGraw Hill, LLC 2
Introduction
There is no “one best way” to design jobs and structure
organizations.
Organizations need to create a fit between environment,
competitive strategy, and philosophy and its jobs and
organizational design.
Failing to design effective organizations and jobs has
important implications for competitiveness.
Work-Flow Design:
• Important in understanding how to bundle tasks into discrete
jobs.
Organization Structure:
• Need to understand how jobs at different levels relate.
LO 4-1
© McGraw Hill, LLC 4
Work-Flow Analysis and Organization
Structure 2
Work-Flow Analysis:
• A means to understand all tasks required to produce high-quality
products, and the skills necessary to perform those tasks.
Work-Flow Analysis
• Analyzing work outputs:
• Can be a product or service.
Work-Flow Analysis
• Analyzing work processes:
• Determine how output is generated (operating procedures).
• Lean production.
Work-Flow Analysis
• Analyzing work inputs:
• Raw materials.
• Just-in-time inventory.
• Equipment.
• Human skills.
Organization Structure
• Dimensions of structure:
• Centralization.
• Departmentalization.
Organization Structure
• Structural configurations:
• Functional structure.
• Divisional structure.
• Not efficient.
© McGraw Hill, LLC SOURCE: Adapted from J. A. Wagner and J. R. Hollenbeck, Organizational Behavior: Securing Competitive Advantage, 3rd ed. (New York: Prentice Hall, 19 98). 13
Figure 4.3 Divisional Structure: Product
Structure
© McGraw Hill, LLC SOURCE: Adapted from J. A. Wagner and J. R. Hollenbeck, Organizational Behavior: Securing Competitive Advantage, 3rd ed. (New York: Prentice Hall, 19 98). 14
Figure 4.4 Divisional Structure:
Geographic Structure
© McGraw Hill, LLC SOURCE: Adapted from J. A. Wagner and J. R. Hollenbeck, Organizational Behavior: Securing Competitive Advantage, 3rd ed. (New York: Prentice Hall, 19 98). 15
Figure 4.5 Divisional Structure: Client
Structure
© McGraw Hill, LLC SOURCE: Adapted from J. A. Wagner and J. R. Hollenbeck, Organizational Behavior: Securing Competitive Advantage, 3rd ed. (New York: Prentice Hall, 19 98). 16
Work-Flow Analysis and Organization
Structure 8
Organization Structure
• Variations in an organization’s structure:
• Keep subunits small.
• “Middle-of-the-road” approach.
© McGraw Hill, LLC 17
Work-Flow Analysis and Organization
Structure 9
Organization Structure
• Structure and the nature of jobs:
• Jobs in functional structures need to be narrow and highly
specialized.
• Selection.
• Performance appraisal.
• Career planning.
• Job evaluation.
LO 4-2
© McGraw Hill, LLC 19
Job Analysis 2
• Job specifications.
• Job incumbent.
• Supervisors.
• Social networks.
Replace
with social
network
vs. org
chart
diagrams
and
slides.
• Mental processes.
• Work output.
• Job context.
• Other characteristics.
LO 4-3
© McGraw Hill, LLC 24
Table 4.2 Overall Dimensions of the
Position Analysis Questionnaire
Dimensions of Position Analysis Questionnaire:
• Decision/communication/general responsibilities.
• Clerical/related activities.
• Technical/related activities.
• Service/related activities.
• Regular day schedule versus other work schedules.
• Routine/repetitive work activities.
• Environmental awareness.
• General physical activities.
• Supervising/coordinating other personnel.
• Public/customer/related contact activities.
• Unpleasant/hazardous/demanding environment.
• Nontypical work schedules.
LO 4-4
© McGraw Hill, LLC 27
Job Design 1
2. Motivational.
3. Biological.
4. Perceptual-motor.
Mechanistic Approach:
• Identify simplest way to structure work to maximize efficiency.
• Scientific management.
• Workers are trained in the “one best way” to do job, then selected
on their ability to do the job.
• Monetary incentives.
Mechanistic Approach:
• Focuses on psychological and motivational potential of a job.
• Job gentrification.
© McGraw Hill, LLC 30
Job Design 4
Biological Approach:
• Goal is to minimize physical strain by structuring the physical
work environment around how the body works.
• Also called ergonomics.
Perceptual-Motor Approach:
• Design jobs that don’t exceed people’s mental capabilities and
limitations.
• Information overload can detract from performance.
• Absence presence results when interacting with multiple media.
How important is it
for you to find work
that meets this
definition of
purpose?
12 engagement
questions Gallup
has found to be
most associated
with individual
and group
performance.
Q12 is
administered
annually to 25M
employees in 189
countries.
20%
cannot
0%
48
)
80
)
27
)
08
)
39
) operate on
7 6 6 8 4
(N
=2
(N
=4 =1
0
=2
5
=1
2
just hope and
p p (N (N (N
llo
w
-u
llo
w
-u
w
-u
p
w
-u
p
w
-u
p
it is destined
fo fo llo llo llo
rv
ey
rv
ey ey
fo
ey
fo
ey
fo
to fail even if
su su rv rv rv
su su su
bou
t
bou
t
out
nt
in
nt
in people think
nt
a
nt
a ab e e
id
e
id
e ur
e
onfid
onf
id you will do
onf onf ns C c
un
c
U
nc
U
Ve
ry
nothing.
ry 4
Ve
4
Task Identity The degree to which a job requires completion of a “whole” and identifiable
piece of work – that is, doing a job from beginning to end with a visible
outcome.
Task Significance The degree to which the job has a substantial impact on the lives of other
people, whether those people are in the immediate organization or in the
external environment.
Autonomy The degree to which the job provides substantial freedom, independence,
and discretion in scheduling one’s work and in determining how to do the
work.
Job Feedback The degree to which carrying out the work activities required by the job
provides the individual with direction and clear information about his or her
performance.
Vertical Loading Giving employees responsibilities and tasks that were formerly reserved
for managers. Primary Impact: Autonomy.
Natural Grouping Having each employee complete entire jobs or projects. Primary Impacts:
Skill Variety, Task Identity, Task Significance.
Formation of Natural Combining similar individual jobs into the same natural work unit be it by
Teams geography, business type, customer group, etc. Primary Impact: Task
Identity, Task Significance.
Opening Feedback Designing jobs to provide as much (useful) feedback as possible from the
Channels job itself, customers, supervisors, or coworkers. Primary Impact:
Feedback.
Establishing Client Having the person doing the job come into contact with the recipient of the
Relationships service. Primary Impacts: Feedback, Skill Variety, Task Significance,
Autonomy.
Mean
MPS =
112.09
The reality is that job crafting is happening all the time as it brings out interests
and strengths. Please share an example of how you crafted a job
or………….maybe should’ve but didn’t!!