0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views76 pages

Msap 2024 Slide

Uploaded by

haikal shariff
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17 views76 pages

Msap 2024 Slide

Uploaded by

haikal shariff
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 76

Social Dominance Effects on

Milk Production, Behaviour,


and Physiological Performance
of Lactating Dairy Cows
Introduction

Feeding &
Social
Resting
Hierarchy
Behaviour

Physiology
Dairy cattle are gregarious animals that form a strict
Social
social hierarchy through dominance establishment.
Hierarchy
Dominance is associated with higher ranking individuals
having priority of access in the distribution of resources
(Hussein et al., 2016), mainly feed and space.

The cow’s dominance value (DV) can be quantified by


recording social interactions, which is the basic component of
dairy cattle's social rank establishment (Guhl & Atkeson, 1959).

Due to the competitive interaction, lower ranking animals may


suffer greater disadvantages compared to higher ranking animals
that have advantage in winning.
Feeding & Lower ranking cows spent less time feeding, resting and
Resting were less synchronized with others in their feeding
Behaviour behaviour (Ungerfeld et al. 2014; Nogues et al, 2020).

Galindo and Broom (2020) stated that low-ranking cows


spent less time lying and more time standing still and
standing half in the cubicles than middle- and high-ranking
cows.

As time spent standing increased, the number of soft tissue


lesions increased and as total time standing increased the
number of cases of lameness increased.
Previous study found that agonistic interaction causes social
Physiology stress among herd members which was reflected in the
increased in cortisol level, especially in the lower ranking
animals (Kerley, 2021).

Agonistic interactions among group members also found to have


caused a reduction in milk yield (Hasegawa et al., 1997), and
disruption in reproduction performance (Moberg, 1991).

This leads to the question of whether social dominance affects


the dairy cows’ behaviour, physiological, and production
performance or not, and whether the understanding of the
importance of social dominance can be used to improve the
Malaysian dairy farm grouping management under the feedlot
system.
Objective
To determine the effects of social dominance on the behaviour, physiological, and
production performance of lactating dairy cows.

Specific Objectives
• To determine the effects social dominance on milk production of lactating dairy cows.
• To study the influence of social dominance on lactating dairy cows’ feeding and resting
behaviour.
• To investigate the effects of social dominance on cortisol, estrogen and progesterone
level of lactating dairy cows.
Hypothesis
Social dominance affects lactating dairy cows production and influenced their
behaviour and physiological performance.

Specific Hypothesis
• Older and higher producing cow is more dominant than their subordinate herd
member.

• Dominant cows spend more time feeding and resting than subordinate cows.
• Dominant cows have higher concentration of progesterone and estrogen compared to
mid-ranking and subordinate cows.
• Subordinate cows have the highest concentration of cortisol.
Materials and Methods
Experimental site &
Herd management
Farm Fresh, Farm 16, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang,
Selangor.

50 lactating Friesian × Jersey, multiparous dairy cows

Grouped and managed together under the Farm Fresh


management feedlot system

Mid-lactation phase (DIM = 155 23), ranged between 3.5 to


5.5 years, with average milk yield ranging from 12 to 28
L/day.

Milked twice daily at 0630 and 1830 h. After the milking, all
cows were kept in the same barn and offered feed twice daily.
Behaviour observation
Direct visual observation
0730h – 1330h (6 hours)
Bunting
14 continuous day
After morning feed allocation

Type of behaviour observed:


- Bunting Pushing
- Pushing
- Allogrooming (Phillips, 2002)

Allogrooming
Table 1. Types of dominance behaviour and its score.
Types of Description Score
behaviour
Swinging or pushing their head in the direction of 4
Bunting the other animals to displace them

Uses part of their body other than the head to 3


Pushing displace another cow
One cow licks the body regions of another cow 1
Allogrooming

Each type of behaviours were given a score depending on the level of intensity of aggression
performed by cows (Sołtysiak and Nogalski, 2010; Table 1).

All observed cases of social interactions indicating dominance and submission between cows were
recorded on a win and loss basis (Beilharz & Mylrea, 1963), using an 'all-occurrences’ sampling method
(Altman, 1974).
Determining dominance value (DV)
The total win and loss score were plotted onto a master chart (MC) on which was entered
every animal in the herd (Schein and Fohrman, 1955).

From the MC, DV were calculated based on each cow total won or lost interactions, with the
ratio of wins to losses transformed into a normal distribution using the following formula:

DV = sin-1 (Σx/x + y) 1/2


Where x = number of wins, and y = number of losses
(Beilharz and Mylrea 1963; Phillips and Rind, 2002).

Table 2. Social rank based on DV range


Social rank DV range
Dominant 60.0 to 90.0

Mid-ranking 30.0 to 59.0

Subordinate 0.0 to 29.0


Table 3. Average number of win, lost, and total social interactions per cow according to the social
group of dominant, mid-ranking and subordinate.

Average no. of interactions per cow


Social group
Win Lost Total

Dominant 53.4 24.9 78.3

Mid-ranking 33.6 40.2 73.8

Subordinate 13.6 36.9 50.5


Production parameters

Parameter Sampling

Milk yield (L) Recorded manually during morning and evening milking for
7 consecutive days (day 1,3,5,7,9,11, and 13).

Body condition Assessed using a ten-point scale (Roche et al., 2004) during feeding
score (BCS) on the first day of milk sampling.
Behaviour parameters
• A total of 36 cows that have been attributed DV

• Classified as : Dominant (D; top 12 cows),


Mid-ranking (M; mid 12 cows),
Subordinate (S; bottom 12 cows)

• Used for the feeding and resting behaviour


observational study.

• All 36 cows biodata such as age was then collected


from Farm Fresh management system.
Behaviour parameters
▪ Observed and recorded for 9 hours between morning and evening milking
(0800 – 1600h) over a period of 7 consecutive days.

▪ Behavioural data were observed by one-zero sampling with a 10 minutes


interval (Mitlohner et al., 2001) using an instantaneous-scan sampling method as
described by Altman (1974).

▪ The cumulative time spent in each activity (except social interactions)


then be calculated, assuming activity recorded occurred over the entire 10
minutes period.
Behaviour parameters

Feeding Ruminating Drinking


Behaviour parameters

Standing Lying
Table 4. Ethogram of the behaviour of interest observed (Phillips and Rind, 2002; Hussein et
al., 2016).
Behaviour Description

Feeding Actively prehending feed with the head lowered.

Ruminating Rhythmic chewing of herbage accompanied by regulars regurgitation of boli


from the rumen.
Drinking Ingestion of water from the water trough.

Standing Maintaining an upright position on extended legs, while ruminating, or


idling.
Lying Lying down in any resting position, while ruminating, or idling.
Pysiological parameters

1. Collect sample 2. Store sample 3. Centrifuge sample

- Milk samples collected


during the morning - Store the collected milk
- Within 24 hours,
milking session (Day 1). samples at 4˚C
- Centrifuge at 4˚C, 2000
immediately after
rpm for 20 minutes.
- Filled in 15ml labelled sampling.
Falcon tubes.
Pysiological parameters

4. Separate supernatant 5. Store supernatant 6. Analyse Hormone levels

- Pipette approximately - Analyse using


- Store the labelled 1.5ml
1000μl of clear commercial ELISA kits
tubes at -20˚C for further
supernatant into labelled - Cortisol, Estrogen, and
analysis.
1.5ml tubes. Progesterone
Statistical Analysis

Pearson's correlation coefficient and one-way ANOVA were used to analyse


relationships between DV and all parameters using SAS statistical package
(SAS Institute Inc., 2005).
Results and Discussions
Table 5. Pearson’s correlation coefficient between dominance value and age, body condition
score, and average milk yield/day.
Table 6. Mean and standard error of mean (SEM) of age, days in milk, lactation phase, body conditio
score, and average milk yield (L/day) according to group (D= dominant; M= mid-ranking; S=
subordinate).
• Age was the key factor in determining dominance.

• Higher-ranking cows usually associated with seniority in a social rank due to the
fact that older cows were more experienced in having encounters with other cows
compared to younger cows (Guhl and Atkeson, 1959).

Social dominance and age were found to have positive correlation (Arave and
Albright, 1981; Friend and Polan,1974), in which dominant animals were older
than lower ranking animals (Deniz e al., 2020)
Table 7. The mean and standard error of mean (SEM) for feeding, ruminating, drinking, standing
and lying and resting behaviour according to the social group of dominance (D), mid-ranking (M)
and subordinate (S) cows.
• D cows spent more time ruminating compared to lower ranking
herd members (P = 0.0371).

• Higher ranking animals spent more time ruminating than their


subordinate members (Ungerfeld et al., 2014; Fiol et al., 2018;
Shinde et al., 2004).

• Ruminating behaviour indicates the cow’s resting time and is


known to be the primary determinant in improving the cow’s
liveweight gain (LWG) (Phillips, 2002).
• The higher amount of time spent ruminating by D cows
in this study suggests that higher-ranking cows had the
privilege of resting longer compared to S cows.

• However, there was no significant difference found in


standing nor lying time, to support the result of this
study.
Table 8. Mean and standard error of mean (SEM) of level of cortisol (ng/ml), progesterone (ng/ml), and
estrogen (ng/ml) according to group (D= dominant; M= mid-ranking; S= subordinate).
• No significant different found in the level of
progesterone and estrogen.

• Subordinate cows have higher cortisol level


compared to dominant and mid-ranking cows.

• Plasma corticosterone levels were considerably


greater in submissive individuals than in dominant
individuals (Williamson et al, 2019).

• This indicate that lower ranking animal may


experience social stress caused by agonistic
interactions in the group.
• Social stress prevent the animals from achieving their
optimum production, reproductive and health
performance (Judd et al., 1994; Creel 2001; Galindo and Broom, 2000; Abbott
et al., 2003).

• No significant difference in milk yield found between the


social groups in this study.

• This demand further study to be done on the effects of


social dominance in reproductive and health performance
in lactating dairy cows.
Conclusions
• In this study, dominant cows are older than their subordinate herd members, with no
differences in milk production nor BCS.

• Dominant had higher ruminating duration indicating longer resting time, compared
to their subordinate herd members.

• Subordinate cows may suffer from social stress indicated by the high cortisol level
compared to the higher ranking cows found in this study.

• Farmers can consider the cows’ social behaviour to be included in their animal
grouping management, to prevent social stress especially in the lower ranking cows.
Thank you
Table of contents
Our company Our services
You can describe the topic
of the section here
01 02 You can describe the topic
of the section here

Our clients Projection


You can describe the topic
of the section here
03 04 You can describe the topic
of the section here

Works Conclusions
You can describe the topic
of the section here
05 06 You can describe the topic
of the section here
Our company
01 You can enter a subtitle here if
you need it
Our philosophy

Mercury Venus Mars


Mercury is the closest Venus has a beautiful Despite being red, Mars is
planet to the Sun and the name but is a really hot actually a very cold place
smallest of them all planet to live in to live
Our services
Venus Jupiter
Venus has a beautiful It’s the biggest planet
name of them all

Mars Saturn
Mars is actually a very Saturn is the only
cold place planet with rings

Mercury Neptune
It’s the closest planet It’s the farthest planet
to the Sun from Sun
“This is a quote. Words full
of wisdom that someone
important said and can
make the reader get
inspired.”
— Someone Famous
Our locations
Mercury
It’s the closest planet to the Sun and
the smallest in the System

Venus
Venus has a beautiful name but is a
really hot planet to live in

Mars
Despite being red, Mars is actually a
very cold place to live
Best sellers
Mercury
It’s the closest planet to the Sun and the
smallest in the System

Venus
Venus has a beautiful name but is a really
hot planet to live in

Mars
Despite being red, Mars is actually a very
cold place to live
Our numbers
50% 75% 25% 60%

Mercury Venus Jupiter Mars


It’s the closest Venus has a very It’s the biggest Mars is actually a
planet to the Sun beautiful name planet of them all very cold place
Awesome words
Customer profile
Demographic Behavior Geographic

Age 25-50 years old ● Mercury is the closest


planet to the Sun and the
smallest one
Gender Male and female
● Venus has a beautiful name
and is the second planet
Occupation Employees from the Sun
and students
● Despite being red, Mars is
Family Single and married actually a cold place. It’s Region Europe, Asia
Situation people full of iron oxide dust
Area Urban
Income $50,000/year

Follow the link in the graph to modify its data and then paste the new one here. For more info, click here
333,000
Is Jupiter’s rotation period

24h 37m 23s


Earths is the Sun’s mass

386,000 km
from the Earth to the Moon
Our growth
Mercury
Mercury is the closest planet to
the Sun and the smallest one in
the System

Venus
Venus has a very beautiful
name and is the second planet
from the Sun

Follow the link in the graph to modify its data and then paste the new one here. For more info, click here
Future projects
Team A Team B Team C Team D Team E Team F
Mercury XX XX XX XX XX XX

Mars XX XX XX XX XX XX

Saturn XX XX XX XX XX XX

Venus XX XX XX XX XX XX

Jupiter XX XX XX XX XX XX

Earth XX XX XX XX XX XX

Moon XX XX XX XX XX XX
Testimonials
Helen Doe, 23
Mercury is the closest planet to the
Sun and the smallest one

John Smith, 32
Venus has a beautiful name and very
high temperatures

Mick Fanny, 28
Despite being red, Mars is a cold
planet full of iron oxide
500,000
Big numbers catch your audience’s
attention
Latest awards
Award 1
Venus has a very beautiful
name and is the second planet
from the Sun

Award 2
Mercury is the closest planet
to the Sun and the smallest one
in the System
Our team

Timmy Jimmy
You can talk a bit about
this person here

Jenna Doe
You can talk a bit about
this person here
Our website
You can replace the image on the
screen with your own work. Just
right-click on it and select “Replace
image”
Thanks!
Does anyone have any questions?
[email protected]
+91 620 421 838
yourcompany.com

Please keep this slide for attribution

CREDITS: This presentation template was created by


Slidesgo, including icons by Flaticon, infographics &
images by Freepik
Icon pack
Content of this template
You can delete this slide when you’re done editing the presentation

Fonts To view this template correctly in PowerPoint, download and install the fonts we used

Used and alternative resources An assortment of graphic resources that are suitable for use in this presentation

Thanks slide You must keep it so that proper credits for our design are given

Colors All the colors used in this presentation

Icons and infographic resources These can be used in the template, and their size and color can be edited

Editable presentation theme You can edit the master slides easily. For more info, click here

For more info: You can visit our sister projects:


SLIDESGO | BLOG | FAQs FREEPIK | FLATICON | STORYSET | WEPIK | VIDEVO
Alternative resources
Here’s an assortment of alternative resources ● Chicken eating grains in the farm
whose style fits the one of this template: ● Flock of chicken on farm
● Box with fresh picked eggs
Photos ● Cock and chicken in yard
● Top view egg carton ● Beautiful rooster side view
● Group of ducks with dark feathers ● Long shot rooster staying outside
● Group of ducks looking at camera ● Close-up of a woman feeding hens
● Hen standing in the farmyard ● A person holding hen in hand at outdoors
● Young hens looking for food in the farmyar ● Medium shot rooster in pen
d
● Medium view man on a field of sunflowers
● A person hand touching roaster in the park
● Two white hens in the barn
● Close-up of woman feeding corn seed to chi
cken in the farm
Resources
Did you like the resources on this template? Get ● Domestic chicken eating grains
them for free at our other websites: ● Chicken mother with peepers eating
● Close-up kid holding chicken food
Photos ● Close-up group of domestic chickens at far
● Side view of a rooster perching on wooden m
fence ● Close-up rooster and blurred chickens
● Man placing hatch eggs from nest into the c ● Country lifestyle concept hens in nest
arton
● Chickens sitting on hay at the farm on a sun
● Hen looking for food in the farmyard
ny day
● Hens looking aggressively at something in t ● Couple working at farm
he farm yard
● Woman farmer collecting eggs
● High angle egg carton with wheat
● Front view man posing for camera
● Group of chickens at farm eating
● Eggs in hay at the farm from chickens Icons
● Black chickens at farm eating grass ● Icon Pack: Agriculture | Filled
Instructions for use
If you have a free account, in order to use this template, you must credit Slidesgo by keeping the Thanks slide. Please
refer to the next slide to read the instructions for premium users.

As a Free user, you are allowed to:


- Modify this template.
- Use it for both personal and commercial projects.

You are not allowed to:


- Sublicense, sell or rent any of Slidesgo Content (or a modified version of Slidesgo Content).
- Distribute Slidesgo Content unless it has been expressly authorized by Slidesgo.
- Include Slidesgo Content in an online or offline database or file.
- Offer Slidesgo templates (or modified versions of Slidesgo templates) for download.
- Acquire the copyright of Slidesgo Content.

For more information about editing slides, please read our FAQs or visit Slidesgo School:
https://slidesgo.com/faqs and https://slidesgo.com/slidesgo-school
Instructions for use (premium users)
As a Premium user, you can use this template without attributing Slidesgo or keeping the "Thanks" slide.

You are allowed to:


● Modify this template.
● Use it for both personal and commercial purposes.
● Hide or delete the “Thanks” slide and the mention to Slidesgo in the credits.
● Share this template in an editable format with people who are not part of your team.

You are not allowed to:


● Sublicense, sell or rent this Slidesgo Template (or a modified version of this Slidesgo Template).
● Distribute this Slidesgo Template (or a modified version of this Slidesgo Template) or include it in a database or in
any other product or service that offers downloadable images, icons or presentations that may be subject to
distribution or resale.
● Use any of the elements that are part of this Slidesgo Template in an isolated and separated way from this
Template.
● Register any of the elements that are part of this template as a trademark or logo, or register it as a work in an
intellectual property registry or similar.

For more information about editing slides, please read our FAQs or visit Slidesgo School:
https://slidesgo.com/faqs and https://slidesgo.com/slidesgo-school
Fonts & colors used

This presentation has been made using the following fonts:

Playfair Display
(https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Playfair+Display)

Roboto
(https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Roboto)

#49433d #fdffeb #355f16 #7f9430 #c2a6a3


Storyset

Create your Story with our illustrated concepts. Choose the style you like the most, edit its colors, pick
the background and layers you want to show and bring them to life with the animator panel! It will boost
your presentation. Check out How it works.

Pana Amico Bro Rafiki Cuate


Use our editable graphic resources...

You can easily resize these resources without losing quality. To change the color, just ungroup the resource
and click on the object you want to change. Then, click on the paint bucket and select the color you want.
Group the resource again when you’re done. You can also look for more infographics on Slidesgo.
JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE

PHASE 1

Task 1

Task 2

PHASE 2

Task 1

Task 2

JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL

PHASE
1

Task 1

Task 2
...and our sets of editable icons

You can resize these icons without losing quality.


You can change the stroke and fill color; just select the icon and click on the paint bucket/pen.
In Google Slides, you can also use Flaticon’s extension, allowing you to customize and add even more icons.
Educational Icons Medical Icons
Business Icons Teamwork Icons
Help & Support Icons Avatar Icons
Creative Process Icons Performing Arts Icons
Nature Icons
SEO & Marketing Icons

You might also like