0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views

GROUP

introduction to group

Uploaded by

vibha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views

GROUP

introduction to group

Uploaded by

vibha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

GROUP

• A group consists of two or more persons who share


norms about certain things with one another and
whose social roles are closely interlocking.
(Newcomb:Social Psychology.1960)
• Two or more persons engaged in any kind of
functional relationship with each other constitute a
group(Lindgren:An introduction to Social
Psychology,1972)
• A group is social unit which consists of a
number of individuals who stand in (more or
less)definite status and role relationship to
one another and which possesses a set of
values or norms of its own regulating the
behavior of individual member or at least in
matters of consequences of the group.(Sherif
&Sherif:An outline of Social Psychology)
It (interaction)need not be physical face to
face interaction. However,verbal or written
interaction may suffice.(Feldman:Social
Psychology)
 A primary group is composed of people who
are emotionally close, know one another well,
and seek one another’s company.
 These groups are characterized by primary
relationships that are intimate, personal,
caring, and fulfilling.
 Primary groups are the most important setting
for socialization.
Characteristics of Group(Primary Group)
(External)

• Small no. of members


• Face to face relation
• Intimacy among members
• Lack of specific relationship
• Common cultural background
• Limited interest
Internal
• Spontaneity in relationship
• Personal relationship(we-feeling)
• Strong feeling of cooperation
• Possible maximum control
• Relationship among members in an end in
itself
Secondary Group
• Large size
• Formal Relationship
• Indirect Relationship
• Contractual Relationship
• Specific Purpose
• Lack of intimacy and ego involvement
• Limited Responsibilty
Structure of Group
Secord and Beckman(1974)
Interactions between the members of the group
about specification of different aspects of
patterened regulations---found in in
perceptions,feelings and reactions of the
group members
Donnerstine and Donnerstine(1984)
How group is organized ?
Key Elements of Group Structure
• Size of the group
• Individual roles in group
• Group relations
• Communication structure
• Relationships among different social group
Functions of Group
• Differential satisfaction of wants
• Satisfaction of dominance and belongings
• Creation of new needs
• Socialization of individuals
• To maintain cultural continuity
• Multiple group members
Meaning of Group Effectiveness
• Key Criteria
• Group Productivity
• Member Satisfaction
• Determinants
• Factors related to group structure
1.Size of the group
(Seashore,1954,Mann&Baumgartel,1952)
2.Composition of the Group
• (a) Homogeneity(Terman et.al.,1938)
• (b)Heterogeneity(Cattell et.al.,1953) contd….
• (c)Compatibility(Schutz,1958)
3. Status Hierarchy(Kelley,1951,Bales,1953
et.al.,)
4.Channels of Communication(Shaw,1954
&Leavitt,1951)
• Factors related to group Interactions
• (affected by intermediate variables)
• 1.Leadership Style(Maier&Solem,1952)
• (a)leadership role(Kahn&Katz,1983)
• (b)Closeness of supervision
• (c)Employee orientation
• 2.group work motivation(Thomas,1957)
• 3. friendship relations
(Horsfall&Arendsberg,1949)
Social Facilitation: The Zajonc Soln.
• Zajonc Robert (1965,1980)soln.involved three
basic steps.

• First,increase in specific drive which happens in


the presence of others.

• Most social psychologists define drive as


diffused physiological arousal that energizes
behavior (Geen & Bushman). Contd…..
• Zajonc pointed out that increased drive
enhances an individual ‘s tendency to perform
the dominant response.

• On a simple task,the dominant response is


often correct:on a complex task,the dominant
response is often incorrect.
Determinants of Social Facilitation
• Evaluation Apprehension
• M.J.Rosenberg,1969
• Scott Bartis &his Colleagues,1988
• K.M.Allen et.al.,1991
• Distraction
• Baron,1986
• Geen,1991
Social Loafing
• Social loafing was first studied in late 1880s by a
French agricultural engineer named Max
Ringlemann.

• When an individual ‘s contribution to a collective


activity can not be evaluated. Individuals often work
hard than they would alone.This effect is known as
Social Loafing.

• contd…..
• Social Loafing

If group‘s person
is unimp. To SOCIAL LOAFING
Presence of others individual
creates a situation
in which an
individual‘s
performance can’t If group’ s
be evaluated person is Increased effort
important to Social
individual compensation
Process leading to social loafing vs social
compensation
• Social loafing is not restricted to simple motor
task. Sharing responsibility with others also
reduces the amount of effort people put into
cognitive tasks (Weldon &Gargano,1988).
• Social loafing poses a threat to the
productivity of group effort throughout
society. It is called “social disease.”
• Social loafing is reduced or eliminated when
participants believe that their individual
contributions are not identifiable (Williams
et.al.,1981).
• Social loafing is prevented when people regard
the task as personally relevant (Bricker
et.al.,1986),challenging(Harkins
&Petty,1982)or highly attractive(Zaccaro).
Social Conformity
• First significant study was made by Sherif in 1935.
• “The essence of conformity is the yielding to group
pressure”(Kretch,Crutchfield &Ballachey,1962),

• Conformity is behavior by which an individual


yields to group pressures,despite the personal
feelings that heor she should act in some other
manner (Worchel & Cooper,1979).
• Conformity refers to a change in between or
belief toward group as a real or imagined
group pressure(Kiesler & Kiesler,1969).
Factors influencing Conformity
• Group related factors:
• 1. size of the group
• 2.composition of group
• 3.unanimity of group
• 4.strength of coersion
• 5.large social context
• Personality related factor
• Self-esteem and competence
• Tendency to ingratiate
• Motivation
• Attraction
• Task -related factors

You might also like