Unit 9 8605
Unit 9 8605
PRESENTED BY :
SHAHID IQBAL TABASSUM
M.Phil, M.Ed
EVALUATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
3
EVALUATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Objectives:
After studying this chapter the trainee teachers can be able to
4
EVALUATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
6
EVALUATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Context
What is the relation of the course to other courses?
Is the time adequate?
What are critical or important external factors (network , ministries)?
Should courses be integrated or separate?
What are the links between the course and research/extension
activities?
Is there a need for the course?
Is the course relevant to job needs?
9
EVALUATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Inputs
What is the entering ability of students?
What are the learning skills of students
What is the Motivation of students?
What are the living conditions of students?
What is the students existing knowledge?
Are the aims suitable?
Are the objectives derived from aims?
Are the objectives “smart”?
10
EVALUATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Inputs (continue…)
Is the course content clearly defined?
Does the content (KSA) match student abilities?
Is the content relevant to practical problems?
What is the theory/practice balance?
What resources/Equipment are available?
What Books do the teachers have?
What books do the students have?
How strong are the teaching skills of teachers?
11
EVALUATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Inputs (continue…)
What time is available compared with the workload, for preparation?
What knowledge, skills and attitudes, related to the subject.do the
teachers have?
How supportive is the classroom environment?
How many students are there?
How many teachers are there?
How is the course organized?
What regulations relate to the training?
12
EVALUATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Process
What is the work load of students?
How well/actively do students participate?
Are their any problem related to teaching?
Are their any problem related to learning?
Is there effective 2-way communication?
Is knowledge only transferred to students, or do they use and apply it?
Are there any problems which students face in using
/applying/analysing the knowledge and skills?
13
EVALUATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Process (continue…)
Is the teaching and learning process continuously evaluated?
Is teaching and learning process continuously evaluated?
Is teaching and learning affected by practical/institutional problems?
What is the level of cooperation/interpersonal relations between
teachers/students?
How is discipline maintained?
14
EVALUATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Product
Is there one final exam at the end or several during the course?
Is there any informal assessment?
What is the quality of assessment (i.e. what levels of KSA are
assessed?)
What are the students’ KSA levels after the course?
Is the evaluation carried out for the whole PCD process?
How do students use what they have learnt?
15
EVALUATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Product (continue…)
How was the overall experience for the teachers and for the students?
What are the main “lessons learned”?
Is there an official report?
Has the teacher’s reputation improved as a result (or been ruined)?
16
EVALUATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
17
EVALUATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
18
EVALUATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Purpose of Evaluation
1. Evaluation determines the worth or value of an educational activity
process.
2. Teachers, supervisors, administrators and citizen group need reliable
information relating to:
(a) What did or did not work or worked well.
20
EVALUATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
21
EVALUATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Role of Evaluation
1. To permit appropriate educational decisions to be made. It includes
four stages.
(i) Becoming aware that decision is needed.
(ii) Designing the decision situation
(iii)Choosing among alternatives
(iv) Acting upon the chosen
22
EVALUATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
The CIPP model was created in the 1983 by Daniel Stuffle Beam and
is considered a decision –oriented model that systematically collects
information about a Programme to identify the strengths and
limitations in context or delivery, to improve Programme
effectiveness or plan for the future of a program.
23
HUMAN DEVELOPMENT AND LEARNING
THEORIES REGARDING INTELLECTUAL DEVELOPMENT
24