Chapter 6 Review of Literature
Chapter 6 Review of Literature
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
r e sh o u ld b e u s e d in a
Literatu ith
er th a t is c o n s is te n t w
m an n s o f
lo g y a s s u m p ti o n
the methodo uld
lit a tiv e r e se a r c h . I t s h o
qua it
in d u c tiv e ly s o th a t
be used s
o t d ir e ct th e q u e sti o n
does n
e d b y th e r e se a rc h e r.
as k
COMPARISON OF LITERATURE REVIEW FOR
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
DOMAIN LITERATURE REVIEW IN LITERATURE REVIEW IN
QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
PURPOSE To direct the development and Literature does not guide and direct
implementation of a research study. the study, but rather become an aide
once patterns or categories have been
identified.
TIMING Major review is done at the beginning Purpose and timing depend upon the
of the research process and limited type of study.
review is continued during the
generalization of research report.
Relevant sources are cited in all
sections of the research report.
COMPARISON OF LITERATURE REVIEW FOR
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
2. SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE
REVIEW:- Requires more rigorous
and well-defined approach compared
to most other types of literature
review. Systematic literature review is
comprehensive and details the
timeframe within which the literature
was selected.
• Meta-analysis:-
Researcher take findings
from several studies on the
same subject (studies done
on similar objectives) and
analyze these using
standardized statistical
procedures. Patterns and
relationships are detected
and conclusions are drawn.
• Meta-synthesis:- This
technique integrates,
evaluates and interprets
findings of multiple
qualitative research
studies. Meta-synthesis
literature review is
3. ARGUMENTATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW:- Here researcher examines literature selectively in order to
support or contradict an argument, deeply rooted assumption, or philosophical problem already established in the
literature. It should be noted that a potential for bias is a major shortcoming associated with argumentative literature
review.
4. INTEGRATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW : - Critiques, and synthesizes secondary data about research topic in
an integrated way such that new frameworks and perspectives on the topic are generated. If research does not involve
primary data collection and data analysis, then using integrative literature review will be only option.
SOURCES OF THE LITERATURE
REVIEW
PRIMARY SOURCE
It is written by a person who is
responsible for originating or
generating the ideas published.
SECONDARY SOURCE
It is the research report prepared
by someone other than the original
researcher
MERITS OF PRIMARY SOURCES
• Degree of accuracy is quite high.
• It does not require extra caution.
• It depicts the data in great detail.
• For some investigations, secondary
data are not available
DEMERITS OF PRIMARY
SOURCE
• It is expensive.
• Collection of data requires a lot of
time.
• It requires a lot of skills and labour.
MERITS OF SECONDARY SOURCES
• convenient
• It saves time and finance
• In some enquiries primary data cannot be
collected.
• Reliable secondary data are generally
available for many investigations.
SEARCHING THE
LITERATURE
READING THE
LITERATURE
WRITING THE
LITERATURE
STAGE 1:- SEARCHING THE LITERATURE
(Steps in Searching Literature)
It varies with the data base. One can limit the years of search or only
full text articles, limits with language, type of publication, research
design, population etc.
LIMITING SEARCH WITH OPERATORS AND WILD CODE
SEARCH TOPIC HITS
NON-COMPLIANCE 2,45,845
LIMIT TO 2001-2010 99
E. Literature Search Recordings
Name of databases
Authors contacted Exclusion & inclusion
for further information criteria used
Number of relevant
Exact search strategy used
articles found
Key words used
Systematically Record References
Recording Mechanisms
Evaluati
Literature review matrices Literature review protocol
Methodo
on
logical
matrix
matrix
Results How
How
matrix much
have
What has confiden
researche
researche ce do we
rs studied
r found ? have in
this
the
research
evidence
question?
?
STAGE 2 : READING AND CRITIQUING LITERATURE
SOURCES
References that have been identified through the literature search need
to be screened. Some of the points regarding screening are as follow
i) Is the reference readily accessible ?
ii) Is the reference relevant to the topic ?
ii) A third criterion may include the study’s methodological quality
Steps in Reading and Critiquing the Information
AP
BA
S
JOURNALS:-Begin with journal articles in respected, national journals, especially
those that report research studies (i.e. the author or authors poses a question or
hypothesis, collect data, and try to answer the question or support the hypothesis).
Begin with single studies and move on to syntheses on topics. Start with the most
recent studies in the area and then gradually work backwards. Always read the
abstract (or summary) first, as this will help you decide whether the article is
relevant and save working time.
BOOKS:-Next review books related to the topic. Begin with research monographs
that are summaries of the scholarly literature. Then consider entire books on a
single topic or which contain chapters written by different authors.
CONFERENCE PAPER:- Follow this research by reading recent
conference papers on a topic. Look for major, national conferences and
the papers delivered in them.
DISSERTATION:- If time permits, especially at the dissertation
proposal stage, look at the abstracts of dissertation in "
SHODHGANGA Dissertation Abstracts.
DEPTH AND BREADTH OF LITERATURE
Breadth of a literature
review:- It depend on
COVERAGE
how well-researched the
topic is. If there have
been fifty studies on a
specific problem, it would
be difficult for the
researcher to come to
conclusions about the
current stage of
knowledge on a topic
without reading all fifty
reports. Literature review
on new topics or little
researched problems are
necessarily broader, in
that peripherally related
studies are required in
order to develop a
Depth of literature review:-With
respect to the depth of coverage of
studies in a review, the most important
criterion is that of relevancy. Research
that is highly related to the problem or
theory usually merits rather than
detailed coverage, including a
description of the purpose research
approach, instruments, sample, target
population findings and conclusions.
CHARACTERISTICS OF A QUALITY LITERATURE
REVIEW
CHARACTERISTIC
S OF A QUALITY
LITERATURE
REVIEW
CRITIQUING INDIVIDUAL STUDY
Following questions may help to understand how and why the research was
carried out.
f
o
r
S
c
i
e
n
t
i
f
WEB OF SCIENCE HOMEPAGE
IndMED or MedIND INDEXES (NATIONAL
DATABASES OF INDIAN MEDICAL JOURNALS)
It is an international,
specialized platform for
promoting scientific
achievements, as well as
supporting national and
international collaboration
between scientists, publishers
of scientific journals and
scientific entities. There are
currently about 6
300 journals from around the
world, including more than 2
000 from the Polish.
INDEX COPERNICUS Homepage
EMBASE