Chapter 3
Chapter 3
Ragas, Priscilla D
Arambulo, Rogielyn S.
CHAPTER 3
APPROPRIATENESS AND
ALIGNMENT OF
ASSESSMENT METHODS
TO LEARNING
OUTCOMES
Intended Learning Outcome (ILO)
Targets 5 4 3 4 3 3
Knowle
dge and
simple
underst
anding
Deep 2 5 4 4 2 3
understa
nding
and
Reasonin
g
Skills 1 3 5 2 5 3
Products 1 1 5 2 4 4
•Knowledge and simple understanding pertain
to mastery of substantive subject matter and
procedures, In the revised Bloom's taxonomy, this
covers the lower order thinking skills of
remembering, understanding and applying,
Selected-response and constructed-response Items
are best in assessing low level learning targets in
terms of coverage and efficiency.
•A vast amount of knowledge can be assessed even
in a limited time and such test formats are easy to
correct.
•Facts, concepts, principles and procedures
delegates to pencil-and-paper tests quite well.
•Essays elicit original responses and response
patterns.
• Reasoning is the mental manipulation and use of
knowledge in critical and creative ways.
•Deep understanding and reasoning involve
higher order thinking skills of analyzing, evaluating
and synthesizing.
•In checking for deep understanding and reasoning,
essays are best.
•They can be used to assess complex learning
outcomes because students are required to
demonstrate their reasoning and thinking skills.
•To assess skills performance assessment is obviously
the superior assessment method. When used in real-life
and meaningful context, it becomes an "authentic
assessment".
•Performance assessments are suited for applications
with less-structured problems where problem
identification; collection, organization, integration and
evaluation of information; and originality are
•Additionally, they are used when students are
tasked to conduct an oral presentation or physical
performance, or create a product.
•As mentioned, products are most adequately
assessed through performance tasks.
•A product is a substantial and tangible output
that showcases a student's understanding of
concepts and skills and their ability to apply, analyze,
evaluate and integrate those concepts and skills.
•As you can see, it subsumes all levels of the cognitive
domain.
•However, performance assessment is the obvious
choice because this method can assess the attributes
of the product using an analytic rubric.
•Self-assessment and peer evaluation in a
formative assessment allow students to reflect and
make judgments about the quality of their work and
that of their peers based on a set of learning criteria.
Table 3.5 Guide for Assessing Learning Outcomes for
Grade 1
What to How to Assess How to How to
Assess (Suggested Score/ Utilize
Assessment Rate Results
Tool/ Learning
Strategies)
Table 3.5 Guide for Assessing Learning Outcomes for
Grade 1
• Content 1. Quizzes Raw scores To identify
of the • Multiple Rubrics individual
curriculu choice Raw Scores learner with
m • True or false specific
• Facts • Matching type needs
and • Constructed for academic
informatio Response interventions
n that 2. Oral and
learners participation individual
acquire 3. Periodical instruction.
test
• Cognitive 1. Quizzes Raw To identify
operation • Outlining, score learners
s perform organizing, analyzing, s with
on facts interpreting, similar
and translating, needs for
informati converting or academic
on for expressing the interventi
construct information in another ons and
ing format small
meaning • Constructing group
s. graphs, flowcharts, instructio
maps or graphic n.
organizers
Rubri
• Transforming a To assess
textual presentation effectiven
into a diagram ess of
• Drawing or painting teaching
pictures and
• Other output learning
2. Oral participation strategies
.
• Explanation 1. Quizzes To evaluate
Raw scores
• Interpretati • instructional
on Explain/justify materials
• Application something used.
based on
facts/data, To design
phenomena or instructional
evidence materials
Rubrics
• Tell/retell
• Make
connections of
what was
learned in real
life situation
2. Oral
discourse/recit
ation
3. Open-ended
• Learners’ Participation Rubrics To assess
authentic Projects and improve
tasks as Homework classroom
evidence instruction.
of Experiments
understand Portfolio To design in-
ings Others service
• Multiple training
intelligenc
program of
teachers in
the core
subjects of
the
curriculum
Experiments
Portfolio
Table 3.6 Sample Elements of a Learning Plan
TASK 1: CRITIQUING
Below is a learning plan for Grade 7 Mathematics. The
topic is Describing Data through Statistical Measures.
The learning competencies in the Basic Education
curriculum guide were adapted. These are enumerated
At the end of the unit, the students should be able to
Other evidences:
•Assignment
•Seatwork
Quiz Answer the following questions.
1.Which learning competencies are targeted by the
performance task?
2. Is the performance task a good measure of student
understanding of the topic? Why or why not?
3. Are the assessment enumerated under 'other
evidences' appropriate in meeting the learning targets.
What other assessments can you recommend?
Individual/Small Group Assignment:
In your discipline, choose any topic from Grade 1 - Grade
10. Using the learning competencies found in the Basic
Education curriculum guide, develop an assessment
evidence. Justify your choice of assessment methods.
TASK 2: MATRIX COMPLETION
Create a sample assessment matrix on a topic of your
choice. Complete the table. Exchange work with your
learning partner. Critique his/her work focusing on the
alignment of the assessment methods with learning
competencies.
ASSESSMENT MATRIX
Subject and Grade Level:
Content Standard: The learner demonstrates
Performance Standard:
The learner
Cognitive What will I How will I How will I
process assess? assess score?
Rememberin LC:
g
Understandi LC:
ng
Applying LC:
Analyzing LC: